Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stephanie Michelle Smith”
Smith v. Statepublic domain
Greene, J. In this case, the petitioner, Stephanie L. Smith (“Ms. Smith”), entered into a plea agreement with the State. The terms of the agreement included that Ms. Smith would enter a plea of guilty to the crime of theft and that she would serve jail time. At the guilty plea proceeding, the sentencing Circuit Court accepted the term
State v. Smithpublic domain
Opinion by Moylan, J. The key to our resolution of this State appeal was sounded 82 years ago by Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Nathan Cardozo: “[Jjustice, though due to the accused, is due to the accuser also. The concept of fairness must not be strained till it is narrowed to a filament. We are to keep the balance true.” </
Lela Smith Flowers v. Todd A. Boolospublic domain
COLEMAN, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. James Oldrum Smith Jr. (Father) died on August 24, 2006. The present appeal stems from his adult children’s discord over the handling of Father’s estate (Estate), and, as is common in estate cases, the children’s discord over the Estate has resulted in lengthy litigation. The Estate is complicated by the fact that, prior to
Matter of Richard II. v. Stephanie JJ.public domain
Matter of Richard II. v Stephanie JJ. (2018 NY Slip Op 04988) Matter of Richard II. v Stephanie JJ. 2018 NY Slip Op 04988 Decided on July 5, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Repo
Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurancepublic domain
400 S.E.2d 44 (1991) 328 N.C. 139 Michael A. SMITH, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Crystal Michelle Smith, Deceased v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 130A90. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 7, 1991. *45 Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog by Theo
State of Tennessee v. Janet Michelle Stanfield, Tony Alan Winsett, and Justin Bradley Stanfieldpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 4, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JANET MICHELLE STANFIELD, TONY ALAN WINSETT and JUSTIN BRADLEY STANFIELD Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. CC-15-CR-84 Jeff Parham, Judge ___________________________________ No. W2015-02503-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 31, 2017
Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United Statespublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-1148 ____________ ESTATE OF MICHELLE EVETTE MCCALL, et al., Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. [March 13, 2014] LEWIS, J. This case is
Evans v. CBS Corp.public domain
ORDER Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge At Wilmington this 19th day of January, 2017, having considered the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon on December 30, 2016, and upon the expiration of the time allowed for objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with no objections having been filed; IT IS
Kerr v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.public domain
Dyk, Circuit Judge. Leslie A. Kerr petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board's ("MSPB's" or "Board's") dismissal of her claim under the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 ("WPA"), 5 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq., as untimely filed without good caus
Iles v. Ogdenpublic domain
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge. |,Michelle lies filed this appeal to have this Court determine whether La.R.S. 13:5106 B(3)(c) allows the State of Louisiana’s excess insurer, American Alternative Insurance Corporation (AAIC), to pay awards of future medical care expenses and for future attendant care, with interest, directly to her, or immediately to the Future Medical Care Fund. Alternatively, Ms. lies contends th
Iles v. Ogdenpublic domain
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. | ¶ Upon the application for rehearing of this court’s opinion dated 26 February 2010 by the defendants/appellants/cross-appellees, American Alternative Insurance Corporation, State of Louisiana, Louisiana Health Services Center, and Roger Ogden, II, the court grants the application in part and denies in part. In co
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit
Smith v. Hendersonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge A perusal of any newspaper reveals an indisputable truth: People hold strong and divergent views regarding the future of public education. Today’s headlines capture rampant debates about everything from teachers’ unions to charter schools to the new “Common Core” State Standa
State v. Smithpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Smith , 2016-Ohio-5062.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 15CA3686 v. : DECISION AND JUDGM
United States v. Salempublic domain
597 F.3d 877 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aida SALEM, Bogdan Ganescu, and Gianina Simon, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-2378, 08-3226, 08-3238. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 3, 2009. Decided March 9, 2010. *879 Stephanie Michelle Zimdahl (argued), Offi
Rychwalski v. CMSpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Louis Rychwalski, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district co
Hochberg v. THOMAS CARTER PAINTING, INC.public domain
63 So.3d 861 (2011) Joel and Marcia HOCHBERG, Appellants, v. THOMAS CARTER PAINTING, INC., The Place for Tile, Inc., Karlsen Corporation, d/b/a Window Professionals and General Caulking & Coatings Co., Inc., Appellees. No. 3D10-2386. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 8, 2011. *862 Vezina, Lawrence &
OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. In November 2011, Jose Pedro Verde-Rodriguez (“Verde”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania challenging his removal from the United States. The District Court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the petition and transferred the case
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-24-00260-CV BLANCA AMES, NATALIE AMES, § On Appeal from the 431st District Court BRANDON APRIL, CHELSEA ASANTE, SHARON CAGER, KENDRA BEGLEY, HILLARY BUTTERS, BRANDON CAMFIELD, DABRIELLE FRANKLIN, TRAVIS FULTON, JENNY FULTON, SHALINA GOWINS, ASHLEY GRANT, MARSHALL GRANT, KATELYN GRANT, DEMETR
Bishop v. Smithpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 18, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of