Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Stephanie Johnson Smoot”
Johnson v. Jessuppublic domain
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, Chief District Judge. This civil action arises out of the revocation of Plaintiffs' North Carolina driver's licenses, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 20-24.1(a)(2), because of Plaintiffs' failure to pay court fines and costs for motor vehicle violations. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and
United States v. Scottpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Barry A. Scott appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of child pornography found during a border search in which officials searched Scott’s laptop computer and compact discs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Scott contends that the district court violated his rights under the First and Fourth Amendments
United States v. Scottpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Barry A. Scott appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of child pornography found during a border search in which officials searched Scott’s laptop computer and compact discs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Scott contends that the district court violated his rights under the First and Fourth Amendments
State v. Smotherspublic domain
297 S.W.3d 626 (2009) STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Robert Ryan SMOTHERS, Respondent. No. WD 70361. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 17, 2009. *629 Stephanie C. Luntsford, Assistant Prosecuring Attorney, Moberly, MO, for Appellant. Margaret M. Johnston, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO,
Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurancepublic domain
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Brief on Discovery Issues outlining a number of discovery disputes requiring resolution by the Court. This case is before the Court on diversity jurisdiction arising from Nationwide’s alleged negligent and bad faith failure to settle claims against its insured in an underlying state court action ultimately resul
David Donovan v. Brian Vancepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli
Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.public domain
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case arises out of a 2005 automobile accident that occurred when Nationwide’s *1336insured, Seung Park, ran a red light and struck a car driven by Stacey Camacho, causing her death. After the accident, Nationwide had the opportunity to settle the wrongful death and estate claims of Stacey’s
Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurancepublic domain
ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This insurance case arises out of an automobile accident that occurred after Nationwide’s insured, Seung Chun Park, ran a red light and struck a car driven by Stacey Camacho, causing her death. Plaintiffs Jesus Camacho, surviving spouse of Stacey Camacho and LaJean Nichols, Administratrix of the Estate of Stacey Camacho, allege that Nationwide negligently
502 F.Supp.2d 1347 (2007) In Re C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., OVERTIME PAY LITIGATION. No. MDL 1849. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. July 12, 2007. *1348 Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr.,[*] KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, Ju
Platinum Services, Inc.public domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Platinum Services, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62199, 62200 ) Under Contract Nos. W91ZLK-09-D-0001 ) W91QV1-11-D-0003 ) W91QV1-11-D-0004 ) W91QV1-11-D-0006 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE AP
Energy Development Corp. v. Mosspublic domain
591 S.E.2d 135 (2003) 214 W.Va. 577 ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Nancy Louise MOSS, et al., Defendants Below, Appellees, West Virginia Coalbed Methane Review Board, Appellee. No. 31238. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 23, 2003. Decided November 20, 2003.
Platinum Services, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-456C (Filed: July 25, 2025) ************************** PLATINUM SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ************************** Anthony J. Marchese, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Carol L. O’Riordan, of counsel. Stephanie A. Fleming, Trial Attorney, United States Depart
Albers v. Lyonpublic domain
[Cite as Albers v. Lyon, 2026-Ohio-209.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JAMES ALBERS, : APPEAL NO. C-250017 TRIAL NO. A-1903421 FRIEDA AARON, : PATRICIA ADAMS, : JUDGMENT ENTRY MICHELLE AGEE,
Justice Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court. Under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (TUFTA), an asset transferred with “actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” a creditor may be reclaimed for the benefit of the transferor’s creditors unless the transferee “took [the asset] in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value.”
07/01/2002 Case Announcementspublic domain
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Pope v. County of Albanypublic domain
MEMORANDUMÍ-DECISION and ORDER LAWRENCE E. KAHN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.308 II. LEGAL STANDARD . CO o co A. Voting Rights Act. CO o CO B. Gingles Framework. CO l — O III. FINDINGS OF FACT. T — ( A. Background. 1 — | 1. Parties. T — I 2. County Redist
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Broadnax v. Statepublic domain
825 So.2d 134 (2000) Donald BROADNAX v. STATE. CR-97-0113. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. June 30, 2000. Opinion on Return to Remand December 1, 2000. Rehearing Denied January 12, 2001. *149 John McAlpine Wood, Birmingham, for appellant. Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Kathryn D. Anders
Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Columbuspublic domain
936 F.Supp. 1363 (1996) The ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, et al., Defendants. No. C2-89-705. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 26, 1996. *1364 *1365 *1366
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20