Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge In 2007, this Court held that Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. and Unitronics, Inc. (collectively, Unitronics) did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,552,654, held by Samy Gharb. 2 See Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. v. Gharb,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge In 2007, this Court held that Unitronics (1989) (R”G) Ltd. and Unitronics, Inc. (collectively, Unitronics) did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,552,654, held by Samy *151 Gharb.

MEMORANDUM OPINION LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity [Dkt. No. 109] (“Motion for Summary Judgment”). For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs DeLorme Publishing Company, Inc. and DeLorme Inreach, LLC (collectively “DeLorme”) brought this ac

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Substitute and Join Successor in Interest; Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Judgment; Denying Defendant’s Motion for New Trial; Denying Defendant’s Motion to Amend Findings and to Amend the Judgment; Granting Plaintiffs’ Opposition and Objections to Defendant’s Bill of Costs, Construed as a Motion; Granting in Part and Denying in Part

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge This long-running dispute between Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Paleteria La *27 Michoacana, Inc, and Paleteria La Michoa-cana (Sub), Inc. (collectively;, and together with their predecessors

430 F.Supp.2d 609 (2006) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. Marion TUCKER; City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi; Mississippi State Tax Commission and Hounds, Inc. Defendants. No. 1:03 CV 548 WJG-JMR. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. March 15, 2006. *610 Crockett Lindsey, U.S. Attorney's Office,

649 S.E.2d 736 (2007) THOMPSON et al. v. GENERAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY. Thompson v. General Security Insurance Company. Nos. A07A0699, A07A0700. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 31, 2007. O'Neal, Brown & Clark, Manley F. Brown, John Christopher Clark, Jarome Emile Gautreaux, Macon, Dennis P. Helmreich, Lexington, Charles Madden Cork III, Dennis

McMurray, Presiding Judge. The Georgia State Board of Examiners of Psychologists (“appellee”) served Paul Schlachter (“appellant”) with notice of a hearing of charges that he had failed to maintain appropriate treatment boundaries with a former patient in that he had engaged in a sexual relationship with the patient. Appellant submitted a number of pre-hearing motions for ruling by the hearing officer. The hearing officer ente

Memorandum Opinion ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Presently before the Court in these related cases are the Defendants’ renewed motions for judgment on the pleadings that the asserted claims of the ’970 patent are invalid under § 101. (C.A. No. 12-1701-RGA, D.I. 439; C.A. No. 12-1704-RGA, D.I. 419; CA. No. 12-1788-RGA, D.I. 249).1 The motions have been fully briefed. (D.I

(2008) Bernice BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., etc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07-cv-00761-J-25HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. August 28, 2008. ORDER HARVEY E. SCHLESINGER, District Judge. This matter arises out of a class action involving approximately 700,000 citiz

(2008) Anthony L. COOPER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., etc., et al., Defendants. No. 3:08-cv-153-J-32HTS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. August 29, 2008. ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, District Judge. This case is before the Court on plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Doc. 13), defendant'

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0201p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MELVIN STEGER, │ Plaintiff-Appel

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is an “Engle-progeny” tobacco product liability case, in which plaintiff Judith Berger sued defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (PMUSA) for injuries allegedly resulting from PMUSA’s tortious conduct.1 *1067A crucial issue in this case, trial of which

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

380 F.Supp.2d 1279 (2005) Geneva GLOVER and James Gillins, as private attorneys general, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, and Liggett Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:04-CV-403-J-32MMH. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. July 26, 2005. *1280 *1281 Chan P. Townsle

ORDER CARR, District Judge.1 This is an “Engle-progeny”2 suit by Plaintiff Judith Berger (Mrs. Berger), a former smoker of cigarettes, against the manufacturer of those cigarettes, Defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (PMUSA). Following trial, the jury returned a compensatory damages verdict of $6.25 million (with a 40% comparative fault finding) and

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT PM USA’S MOTION FOR RECU-SAL OF THE TRIAL JUDGE MARK W.' BENNETT, District Judge. I have been designated as a visiting judge to retry this “Engle progeny case,” and pending motions have been assigned to me. This case is before me on the October 31, 2014, Motion For Recusal Of The Trial Judge (docket no. 133) by defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. (PM

ORDER Carr, Senior United States District Judge1 This is an “Engle -progeny”2 lawsuit by Plaintiff Judith Berger (“Mrs. Berger”), ■ a former smoker of cigarettes, against the manufacturer of those cigarettes, Defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (“PM USA”). Mrs. Berger, who now suffers from advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (“CO

MEMORANDUM YOUNG1, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This cause is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. Based Pl.’s Opt Out Engle Class (“Defs.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 24, plaintiffs response in opposition, PL’s Resp. Opp’n Defs.’ Mot. Summ. J. Based Class Membership (“PL’s Resp.”),

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1320This is an "Engle -progeny"1 lawsuit by Plaintiff Patricia Harris ("Plaintiff'), as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gerald Harris ("Mr. Harris"), against three cigarette manufacturers, Philip Morris USA, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco C