⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stephan Gibbs”

State v. Gibbspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997-10-24 · Published · cited 187× · 570 N.W.2d 326; 253 Neb. 241; 1997 Neb. LEXIS 212
570 N.W.2d 326 (1997) 253 Neb. 241 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. John GIBBS, also known as John Miller, Appellant. No. S-96-1059. Supreme Court of Nebraska. October 24, 1997. *328 Jeffery A. Pickens, of Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy, and Samuel J. Bethune, Platte County Public Defender, for appe
Gibbs v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983-02-07 · Published · cited 4× · 444 N.E.2d 893; 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2592
444 N.E.2d 893 (1983) Gay GIBBS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 1-882A243. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. February 7, 1983. Rehearing Denied March 14, 1983. *894 James T. Roberts, Nashville, for appellant. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Steph
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-09-19 · Published · cited 121× · 100 A.3d 660; 2014 Pa. Super. 205; 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2914; 2014 WL 4656415
J-A23041-14 2014 PA Super 205 THORSTEN STEPHAN, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. WALDRON ELECTRIC HEATING AND COOLING LLC, Appellant No. 1960 WDA 2013 Appeal from the Judgment entered December 10, 2013, in the Court of Common Pleas of
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-06-21 · Published · cited 58× · 87 A.D.3d 216; 927 N.Y.2d 349
OPINION OF THE COURT Dillon, J.P CPLR 3215 (a) permits the clerk of the court to enter judgment in favor of a plaintiff upon the submission of the requisite proof, when “the plaintiffs claim is for a sum certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain.” As the clear language of the statute indicates, the circumstances under which the clerk is authorized to act are quite narrow, as they are l
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013-05-24 · Published · cited 35× · 285 Neb. 952; 831 N.W.2d 696
Nebraska Advance Sheets 952 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS Gibbs Cattle Co., a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Edna F. Bixler et al., appellees, and Margaret Bixler and Edward Stephen Cassells, appellants. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed May 24, 2013. No. S-12-687. 1. Equity: Appeal and Error. On appeal from an equity action, an appellate court tries factual questions de novo on the record and, as to question
Steele v. Stephanpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 1986-03-27 · Published · cited 3× · 633 F. Supp. 950; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27571
633 F.Supp. 950 (1986) Freda STEELE, James Steele, and Harold Hovander, Plaintiffs, v. Robert T. STEPHAN, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 85-4341-S. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 27, 1986. Margie J. Phelps, Phelps-Chartered, Fred W. Phelps, Topeka, Kan., for plaintiffs. Wm. Scott Hesse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Topeka, Kan., for Robert T. Stephan.</
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001-08-03 · Published · cited 2× · 29 Kan. App. 2d 537; 29 P.3d 431; 2001 Kan. App. LEXIS 733
Knudson, J.: The Kansas Department of Revenue’s Division of Property Valuation (PVD) and the Board of County Commissioners of Sedgwick County, Kansas (County), appeal from the grant *538of summary judgment by the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) to Allen, Gibbs & Houlik, L.C. (taxpayer). BOTA concluded the taxpayer is entitled to a property tax exemption for 43 comp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 348 F. App'x 255
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Mark J. Ferguson appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant Quin-street, Inc. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the summary judgment decision de novo, Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir.2009), and we affirm. Ferguson lacks standing to pursue his claim under the CAN-SPAM Act, codi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 348 F. App'x 255
MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Mark J. Ferguson appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant Quin-street, Inc. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the summary judgment decision de novo, Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir.2009), and we affirm. Ferguson lacks standing to pursue his claim under the CAN-SPAM Act, codi
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000-04-20 · Published · cited 18× · 15 S.W.3d 376; 2000 Ky. LEXIS 42; 2000 WL 426373
15 S.W.3d 376 (2000) COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Petitioner, v. Honorable R. Cletus MARICLE, Judge, Clay Circuit Court, Respondent, and Donald R. Phillips and Mary Ann Phillips, Real Parties in Interest. No. 2000-SC-0036-OA. Supreme Court of Kentucky. April 20, 2000. *377 A.B. Chandler, III, Attorney General of Kentucky, David
State v. Gibbspublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 1928-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 265 P. 24; 45 Idaho 760; 1928 Ida. LEXIS 38
Defendant appeals from a conviction for statutory rape. In view of the disposition of this case, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence as to penetration will not be discussed. Leading questions to a child are within the discretion of the trial court (People v. Hinrich, 53 Cal.App. 186,199 Pac. 1058), and in the absence of the abuse of such discretion, rulings made thereon will not be disturb
Podrygula v. Braypublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 10× · 2014 ND 226; 856 N.W.2d 791; 2014 WL 7185381; 2014 N.D. LEXIS 227
KAPSNER, Justice. [¶ 1] Stephan Podrygula and Psychological Services, P.C. (collectively “Po-drygula”) appeal from a district court order dismissing their complaint against Angela and William Bray for fraud and negligent infliction of emotional distress. We conclude there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the district court did not err in determining the statute of limitations had run. The order to dismiss without pr
Chapman v. Lawsonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015-02-24 · Published · cited 27× · 89 F. Supp. 3d 959; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21834; 2015 WL 774338
OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the July 16, 2014 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 45). The Report recommends granting (1) the Motion to Dismiss of Hamilton County and the unnamed agents of the Hamilton County Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Division (“County Defendants”) (Doc. 20); (2) the Motion to Di
R.S. v. B.L.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-06-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 NY Slip Op 5156
R.S. v B.L. (2017 NY Slip Op 05156) R.S. v B.L. 2017 NY Slip Op 05156 Decided on June 22, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 285 Neb. 971; 830 N.W.2d 488
Nebraska Advance Sheets WTJ SKAVDAHL LAND v. ELLIOTT 971 Cite as 285 Neb. 971 WTJ Skavdahl Land LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, appellee, v. Sandra Elliott, P ersonal R epresentative of the Estate of Evelyn Elliott, deceased, and Sandra Elliott, appellants, and Lynn Elliott et al., appellees.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015-01-26 · Published · cited 1× · 2015 Ohio 207
[Cite as Schaffer v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 2015-Ohio-207.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) BRYCE SCHAFFER C.A. No. 14CA010574 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
District Court, District of Columbia · 1992-06-30 · Published · cited 3× · 797 F. Supp. 1042; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10536; 1992 WL 163217
797 F.Supp. 1042 (1992) STATE OF KANSAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-0233. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 1992. *1043 Robert T. Stephan, John W. Campbell, David J. Gallo, Office of the Attorney General, Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff, State of Kan.
Rishikof v. Mortadapublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-29 · Published · cited 14× · 70 F. Supp. 3d 8; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137049; 2014 WL 4802455
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN, U.S. District Court Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Kamal Mortada for Lack of Jurisdiction [Dkt. No. 26] was referred to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay for a report and recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72. Magistrate Judge Kay filed a Report and Recomme
Rozsnyai v. Svacekpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 59× · 272 Neb. 567; 723 N.W.2d 329; 2006 Neb. LEXIS 166
272 Neb. 567 ALISON J. ROZSNYAI, APPELLEE, v. VINCENT VICTOR SVACEK, APPELLANT. No. S-05-876. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed November 9, 2006. Elizabeth Stuht Borchers, P.C., Ari D. Riekes, and Leilani Harbeck, Senior Certified Law Student, of Marks, Clare & Richards, for appellant. Michael B. Lustgarten, of Lustgarten & Roberts, P.C., L.L.O., for a
State v. Wellspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009-04-03 · Published · cited 97× · 763 N.W.2d 380; 277 Neb. 476
763 N.W.2d 380 (2009) 277 Neb. 476 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Kenneth R. WELLS, Appellant. No. S-07-1138. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 3, 2009. *381 Beau G. Finley, Omaha, of Finley Law Offices, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and James D. Smith, Lincoln, for app