Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Steele v. Tenet Healthcare”
C.R. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.public domain
169 Cal.App.4th 1094 (2009) C.R., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. No. B201220. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. January 5, 2009. [CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*]] *1097 Law Offices of Maryann P. Gallagher and Maryan
United States v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.public domain
343 F.Supp.2d 922 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORP., et al., Defendants. No. CV04-857 GAF(JTLX). United States District Court, CD. California. November 5, 2004. *923 Gary Plessman, Chief, Civil Fraud Section, United States Attorney's Office, Central District of California. David K. Barre
502 F.Supp.2d 1237 (2007) BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 05-80183-CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. August 2, 2007. *1238 Ann C. Turetsky, Hal M. Hirsch, John F. Triggs, Kenneth A. Lapatine, Richard A. Edlin, Greenberg Traurig,
Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Louisiana Forum Corp.public domain
538 S.E.2d 441 (2000) 273 Ga. 206 TENET HEALTHCARE CORP. v. LOUISIANA FORUM CORP. et al. No. S00A0759. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 13, 2000. Reconsideration Denied December 14, 2000. *443 Gambrell & Stolz, Irwin W. Stolz, Jr., Seaton D. Purdom, Atlanta, for appellant. Smi
State of Fla., Office of Atty. v. Tenet Healthcarepublic domain
420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (2005) STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Defendant. BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., d/b/a Boca Raton Community Hospital, on behalf of itself and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Defendant. Nos. 05-20591-CIV, 05-80183-CIV.
Anthem Ins. Companies v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.public domain
730 N.E.2d 1227 (2000) ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC., f/k/a Associated Insurance Companies, Inc., d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and Anthem Life Insurance Company, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, f/k/a National Medical Enterprises, Inc., f/k/a Psychiatric Institutes of America et al., Appellees (Defendants below). No. 10S01-9909-CV-501. Supreme Court of Indi
Steele-Brown v. Stoddardpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen, United States District Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sally Steele-Brown, a recently retired public schoolteacher, commenced this action in this Court on May 20, 2015, asserting federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a state-law claim of gross negligence agains
Dema v. TENET PHYSICIAN SERVICES-HILTONpublic domain
383 S.C. 115 (2009) 678 S.E.2d 430 Robert J. DEMA, Edward M. Finn, and Joyce E. Gadson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. TENET PHYSICIAN SERVICES-HILTON HEAD, INC. and Amisub (Hilton Head), Inc., collectively d/b/a Hilton Head Regional Medical Center, Respondents. No. 26663. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard
Dennis F. Smith v. Tenet HealthSystempublic domain
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Dennis F. Smith (“Smith”) brought this two-count medical malpractice action regarding the amputation of his right leg. The district court 1 granted partial summary judgment and partial judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants on count one. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the de
Dema v. Tenet Physician Services-Hilton Head, Inc.public domain
Chief Justice TOAL: Appellants filed suit against Respondents asserting several causes of action stemming from Hilton Head Regional Medical Center’s (HHRMC) administration of hundreds of unauthorized therapeutic cardiac catheterizations. The trial court dismissed Appellants’ complaint in its entirety. We affirm. *119Factual/Procedural Background
Smith v. Tenet Healthsystem Sl, Inc.public domain
436 F.3d 879 Dennis F. SMITH; Marya Smith, Appellants,v.TENET HEALTHSYSTEM SL, INC., doing business as St. Louis University Hospital; Tenet Healthcare Corporation; St. Louis University; Robert E. Burdge, M.D., Appellees. No. 05-1173. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 17, 2005. Filed: February 3, 2006.
582 F.3d 1227 (2009) BOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation d.b.a. Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, Plaintiff, v. TENET HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-14352. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept
Omega Hosp., LLC v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.public domain
JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants, United Healthcare Services, Inc. and United Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. (collectively "United Defendants" *718or "United").1 Plaintiff, Omega Hospital, LLC ("Omega") has filed an Opposition to
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes; before the Court on Defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 30, 2014 (Doc. 27)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on March .5, 2015. The primary issue are: (i) whether Plaintiff Presbyterian Healthcare Services’ claims ‘arise out of its
Steele v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.public domain
295 F.Supp.2d 439 (2003) William C. STEELE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 02-3783(RBK). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. December 11, 2003. *440 Christopher D. Mannix, Esq., Sidkoff, Pincus & Green, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs. George E. McDavid, Esq., Reed
276 F.Supp.2d 255 (2003) HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROYAL HEALTHCARE OF MIDDLE-SEX, LLC; and Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendants. Middlesex County Improvement Authority, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Surbhi Tarkas; Amjad Chowdry; and Greenwich Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 01-3223 (WHW). United States District Court, D. New Jers
Mills v. Allegiance Healthcare Corp.public domain
178 F.Supp.2d 1 (2001) Charles MILLS, Individually, Marie Mills, and Christopher Mills and Connor Mills, by Their Father and Next Best Friend Charles Mills, Plaintiffs, v. ALLEGIANCE HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Ansell Incorporated, Ansell Perry, Inc., Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc., Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc. f/k/a Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew Perry, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter International, Inc., Owens & Minor, Inc
265 B.R. 88 (2001) In re ALLEGHENY HEALTH, EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Allegheny University Medical Practices, Allegheny Hospitals, Centennial and Allegheny University Hospitals-East, Debtors. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc., Plaintiff, v. National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, District 1199C, and William J. Scharffenberger, Chapter 11 Trustee of Alleghe
463 F.3d 1076 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF the UNITED STATES; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home & Services for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Beverly Health & Rehabilitation Services, Inc. dba Beverly Manor
read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Chamber of Commerce of the United States California Chamber of Commerce Employers Group California Healthcare Association California Manufacturers and Technology Assn. California Association of Health Facilities California Association of Home & Services for the Aging Bettec Corporation Marksherm Corporation Zilaco Inc. → · find the judge →
Gailes v. Marengo County Sheriff's Departmentpublic domain
ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on motions to dismiss filed by all five defendants. (Docs. 17, 19). The parties have filed briefs in support of their respective positions, (Docs. 18, 20, 26, 27), and the motions are ripe for resolution. BACKGROUND According to the amended complaint, (Doc. 16), Sheriff Richard Bates offered