⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Steele v. California Safe Roads Alliance”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-06-07 · Published · cited 243× · 859 F.3d 865; 2017 WL 2454359
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 7, 2017 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
District Court, N.D. California · 2017-07-24 · Published · cited 37× · 268 F. Supp. 3d 1029
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff’), a non-profit environmental organization, filed this citizen suit against Defendants The Shiloh Group, LLC (“TSG”) and Thomas Nelson (“Nel-_son”) (collectively “Defendants”) seeking to enforc
District Court, D. Montana · 2010-05-04 · Published · cited 3× · 703 F. Supp. 2d 1152; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43880; 2010 WL 1872864
703 F.Supp.2d 1152 (2010) ROCK CREEK ALLIANCE; Clark Fork Coalition; Cabinet Resource Group; Montana Wilderness Association; Earthworks; and Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Tom Tidwell, in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Northern Region; Paul Bradford, in his official capacity as Forest supervisor of the Kootenai National Forest; and Ed Schafer, in his
Christy Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Antonio J. Morrison James Landale Crawford, and Cornell D. Brown William E. Landsidle, in His Capacity as Comptroller of the Commonwealth, Law Professors Virginians Aligned Against Sexual Assault the Antidefamation League Center for Women Policy Studies the Dc Rape Crisis Center Equal Rights Advocates the Georgetown University Law Center Sex Discrimination Clinic Jewish Women International the National Alliance of Sexual Assault Coalitions the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence the National Coalition Against Sexual Assault the National Network to End Domestic Violence National Organization for Women Northwest Women's Law Center the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Incorporated Virginia National Organization for Women Virginia Now Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated Women Employed Women's Law Project Women's Legal Defense Fund Independent Women's Forum Women's Freedom Network, Amici Curiae. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, and Christy Brzonkala v. Antonio J. Morrison James Landale Crawford, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cornell D. Brown William E. Landsidle, in His Capacity as Comptroller of the Commonwealth, Law Professors Virginians Aligned Against Sexual Assault the Antidefamation League Center for Women Policy Studies 2 the Dc Rape Crisis Center Equal Rights Advocates the Georgetown University Law Center Sex Discrimination Clinic Jewish Women International the National Alliance of Sexual Assault Coalitions the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence the National Coalition Against Sexual Assault the National Network to End Domestic Violence National Organization for Women Northwest Women's Law Center the Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Incorporated Virginia National Organization for Women Virginia Now Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated Women Employed Women's Law Project Women's Legal Defense Fund Independent Women's Forum Women's Freedom Network, Amici Curiaepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999-03-05 · Published · cited 38× · 169 F.3d 820
169 F.3d 820 Christy BRZONKALA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY;Antonio J. Morrison; James Landale Crawford,Defendants-Appellees,andCornell D. Brown; William E. Landsidle, in his capacity asComptroller of the Commonwealth, Defendants.Law Professors; Virginians Aligned Against Sexual Assault;The Antidefamation League; Center for Women Policy Studies;The DC Rape Cri
California Supreme Court · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 34× · 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 205; 6 Cal. 5th 21; 424 P.3d 290
KRUGER, J. **293 Plaintiff William Jae Kim (Kim) was severely injured after he lost control of his Toyota Tundra pickup truck and drove off an embankment. Together with his wife, Kim brought this strict products liability suit against defendant Toyota Motor Corporation and related entities
District Court, D. Montana · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 347 F. Supp. 3d 561
Brian Morris, United States District Court Judge Plaintiffs Indigenous Environmental Network and Northern Plains Resource Council (collectively "Plaintiffs") bring this action against the United States Department of State ("the Department") and various other governmental agencies and agents in their official capacities. Plaintiffs allege that the Department violated the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), the National Environmenta
District Court, N.D. California · 2013-08-05 · Published · cited 21× · 966 F. Supp. 2d 909; 2013 WL 4029067; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110729
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPLE’S MOTION DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Re: ECF No. 38 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Apple, Ine.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Mot., ECF No. 38. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiffs *914First Amended
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015-10-19 · Published · cited 1× · 88 Mass. App. Ct. 544; 38 N.E.3d 1040
Cohen, J. On November 3, 2010, DeFelice Corporation (DeFelice), a contractor engaged in removing and reinstalling water mains, struck an underground natural gas service line while excavating on Danny Road in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Boston. The ensuing explosion and fire destroyed a single family home at 17 Danny Road, and badly damaged other nearby residences.
California Court of Appeal · 2023-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/18/23; Opinion on rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- SAVE OUR CAPITOL!, C096617 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.
California Court of Appeal · 2022-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/6/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- SAVE OUR CAPITOL!, C096617 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-06-11 · Published · cited 20× · 208 A.3d 626; 331 Conn. 816
ECKER, J. Section 324A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts imposes negligence liability, when certain conditions are met, on a party whose negligent performance of a contractual undertaking causes foreseeable physical harm to a nonparty to the contract. The present appeals require us to determine the scope of this duty under unusual circumstances. For approximately one week preceding
California Supreme Court · 2005-06-16 · Published · cited 23× · 113 P.3d 41; 29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 352; 35 Cal. 4th 1125; 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5197; 2005 Daily Journal DAR 7111; 2005 Cal. LEXIS 6557
Opinion MORENO, J. The estate of a passenger who died as a result of injuries allegedly sustained while riding on the Indiana Jones attraction at Disneyland brought causes of action based upon Civil Code section 2100, which requires a “carrier of persons for reward” to “use the utmost care and diligence” for the safety of its passengers, and Civil Code section 2101, which imposes a duty upon such a carrier to
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-05-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 16‐3300, ‐3303, ‐3304 WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., ILLINOIS CENTRAL R.R. CO., and GRAND TRUNK WESTERN R.R. CO., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant‐Appellee. __________
Ainsworth v. Owenbypublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 2018-08-17 · Published · cited 11× · 326 F. Supp. 3d 1111
MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiffs are a group of residential property owners displeased with the effects of an alleged marijuana production and processing operation hosted on nearby land. Defendants are the owners of the land on which the marijuana operation is claimed to be maintained and several alleged participants in that operation.1 As to each defendant, Plaintiffs assert one state-law nuisance claim and t
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-04-09 · Published · cited 9× · 98 F.4th 288
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-01-16 · Published · cited 59× · 913 F.3d 423
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants are three municipalities who use the National Instant Criminal Background Check System to carry out their obligations under state law. This system, known as the NICS, is managed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Department of Defense (DOD) is required under federal law to provide records to the NICS but has persistently been unable to fu
New York Court of Appeals · 2023-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 11 Kathleen Henry, Respondent, v. New Jersey Transit Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Lawrence McGivney, for appellants. Brian J. Isaac, for re
California Court of Appeal · 2022-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/12/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TIBURON OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A159860 v. (Marin County Super. COUNTY OF MARIN, Ct. No. CIV1704069) Defendant and Re
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-04-02 · Published · cited 0× · 604 U.S. 542
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 2 Pages 542–592 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT April 2, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023-08-18 · Published · cited 8× · 82 F.4th 1152
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 3, 2023 Decided August 18, 2023 No. 22-1019 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO, PETITIONER v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS SEVEN COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION AND UINTA BASIN RAILWAY, LLC,