⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “State of Washington v. Second Amendment Foundation”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-07-09 · Published · cited 88× · 928 F.3d 226
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *230 President Donald J. Trump appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Buchwald, J. ) concluding that he engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by utilizing Twi
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017-11-07 · Published · cited 0×
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 23 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF No. 25-807 ARIZONA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE D.C. No. OF OREGON; DELMY FRANCO
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2020-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment Congress has constitutional authority to impose a deadline for ratifying a proposed constitutional amendment. It exercised this authority when proposing the Equal Rights Amendment and, because three-fourths of the state legislatures did not ratify before the deadline that Congress imposed, the Equal Rights Amendment has failed of adop- tion and is no longer pending before the States. Accordingly, even if one or more s
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, et al., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1598 (TSC) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs—the American Civil Liberties Union Foundat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-07-24 · Published · cited 5× · 108 F.4th 1163
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE No. 23-35294 OF OREGON; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF D.C. No. 1:23-cv- COLORADO; STATE OF 03026-TOR CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE OF ILLINOIS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OPINION MICHIGAN; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF VERMONT; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWA
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-10-29 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HERITAGE FOUNDATION et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 24-2862 (TJK) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited the United States in late September 2024. Among the things he did whi
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025-03-17 · Published · cited 5× · 565 P.3d 604
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. ORDER WITHDRAWING AND SUBSTITUTING OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. The court has determined that it should withdraw the published opinion filed on March
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2020-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment Congress has constitutional authority to impose a deadline for ratifying a proposed constitutional amendment. It exercised this authority when proposing the Equal Rights Amendment and, because three-fourths of the state legislatures did not ratify before the deadline that Congress imposed, the Equal Rights Amendment has failed of adop- tion and is no longer pending before the States. Accordingly, even if one or more s
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84887-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION BERNARD BELLEROUCHE, Appellant. DÍAZ, J. — A jury convicted Bernard Bellerouche of assault in the first degree and unlawful possession of a firea
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-11-14 · Published · cited 35× · 271 F.3d 835; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12063; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9663; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24405
271 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2001) WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION; ALLEN D. BROWN; DENNIS H. DAUGS; GREG HAYES; L. DIAN MAXWELL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTSv.LEGAL FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON; KEVIN F. KELLY; BARBARA DURHAM, CHIEF JUSTICE; GERRY L. ALEXANDER, JUSTICE; JAMES M. DOLLIVER, JUSTICE; RICHARD P. GUY, JUSTICE; CHARLES WAYNE JOHNSON, JUSTICE; BARBARA A. MADSEN, JUSTICE; CHARLES Z. SMITH, JUSTICE; PHILIP A. TALMADGE, JUSTICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-01-10 · Published · cited 4× · 236 F.3d 1097; 2001 WL 20994
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: This case raises constitutional questions about Washington’s program for applying interest on lawyers’ (and others’) trust accounts to various good works. I. FACTS Lawyers’ ethical requirements have long required that “[mjoney of the client or collected for the client ... should be reported and accounted for promptly, and should not under any ci
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-01-10 · Published · cited 6× · 236 F.3d 1097; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 297; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 401; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 314
236 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2001) WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION; ALLEN D. BROWN; DENNIS H. DAUGS; GREG HAYES; L. DIAN MAXWELL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.LEGAL FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON; KEVIN F. KELLY; BARBARA DURHAM, Chief Justice; GERRY L. ALEXANDER, Justice; JAMES M. DOLLIVER, Justice; RICHARD P. GUY, Justice; CHARLES WAYNE JOHNSON, Justice; BARBARA A. MADSEN, Justice; CHARLES Z. SMITH, Justice; PHILIP A. TALMADGE, Justice, Defendants-Appellees.<
Supreme Court of Florida · 2020-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC19-1341 ____________ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF AMENDMENT 4, THE VOTING RESTORATION AMENDMENT. January 16, 2020 PER CURIAM. By letter dated August 9, 2019, Governor Ron DeSantis requested the opinion of the justices of this Court as to the interpretation of a
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
FILED AUG 19, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 39943-5
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-2104 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CF-009611-A-O _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. PETER WAS
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 15× · 525 P.3d 615
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-2104 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CF-009611-A-O _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. PETER WASHINGT
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 561 P.3d 761
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 86863-2-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION ERIC EMIL LEER, Appellant. HAZELRIGG, A.C.J. — Eric Emil Leer was charged with two counts of vehicular homicide and two counts o
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-11-19 · Published · cited 3× · 559 P.3d 121
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 86610-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. OPINION PUBLISHED IN PART DANNIE CHRISTOPHER BRASHEAR, Appellant. BIRK, J. — Dannie Brashear appeals his conviction, arguing, among other things, that the trial court violat