Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “State of Utah v. Norton”
State of Utah v. Nortonpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Wilderness Society, New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Arizona Wilderness Alliance, Friends of Nevada Wilderness, and Colorado Environmental Coalition (collectively SUWA), and the National Resources Defense Council, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, California Wilderness Coalition, and Idaho Conservation Leagu
State v. Nortonpublic domain
POHLMAN, Judge: ¶1 Lonnie Norton appeals his convictions arising from events that occurred over one night in November 2012 when he broke into his parents-in-law's house, kidnapped his estranged wife (Wife), and sexually assaulted her. Norton alleges several errors related to the jury instructions and sentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Oc
State v. Nortonpublic domain
*721 Opinion DAVIS, Judge: I 1 David Andrew Norton appeals from the district court's entry of consecutive sentences. Norton argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during sentencing and that but for his counsel's deficient performance, the court would not have impos
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliancepublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliancepublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliancepublic domain
542 U.S. 55 (2004) NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., v. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ET AL. No. 03-101. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 29, 2004. Decided June 14, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. *56 SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion for a un
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Nortonpublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. The Southern Utah Wilderness Afiance and a number of other organizations (collectively, SUWA) brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Utah against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), alleging, among other claims, that the BLM violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Gale Nortonpublic domain
301 F.3d 1217 SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, a Utah non-profit corporation; The Wilderness Society, a national non-profit corporation; Sierra Club, a California non-profit corporation; Great Old Broads for Wilderness, a Utah non-profit corporation; Wildlands CPR, a Montana non-profit corporation; Utah Council of Trout Unlimited, a Utah non-profit organization; American Lands Alliance, a national non-profit corporation; and Friends of the Abajos
540 U.S. 980 NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.v.SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ET AL. No. 03-101. Supreme Court of United States. November 3, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir. 2
Jones v. Nortonpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. This case arises from the death of Ute Tribe member Todd R. Murray on April 1, 2007, following a police pursuit. Murray’s parents Debra Jones and Arden Post, on behalf of themselves and Murray’s estate, brought a 13-count complaint in the district court alleging various constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, conspiracy to violate civil rights u
Norton v. Utahpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.
State v. Nortonpublic domain
67 P.3d 1050 (2003) 2003 UT App 88 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Michael Allen NORTON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020109-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 27, 2003. *1051 Gary L. Bell, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Dean Saunders, Weber County Attorney's Office, Ogden, for Appellee
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the death of Todd Murray, a Ute tribal member, following a police pursuit on the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (the “Reservation”). Murray’s parents, his estate, and the Ute Indian Tribe (the “Tribal Plaintiffs”) sued the officers involved in Ute *1241 <
Utah Ass'n of Counties v. Bushpublic domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. In this case, Mountain States Legal Foundation (“MSLF”) challenges the legality of the 1996 creation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah. Because we conclude that MSLF lacked standing to bring this claim, we dismiss the appeal. I. BACKGROUND A. The Monument
Defenders of Wildlife v. Nortonpublic domain
257 F.Supp.2d 53 (2003) DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary, Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-1544(JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2003. *56 Katherine A. Meyer, Eric R. Glitzenstein, Meyer & Glitzenstein, William J. Snape III, Def
Carcieri v. Nortonpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an administrative decision by the Secretary of the Interior to take into trust a 31-acre parcel of land located in Charlestown, Rhode Island (“the Parcel”)1 for the benefit of the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island. Plaintiffs-appellants Donald L. Carcieri, Governor of Rhode Island, the State of Rhode Island, and the Town of Charles-town, Rho
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engelpublic domain
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A24-0271 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicholas Norton Engel, Appellant. Filed March 3, 2025
Shivwits Band of Paiute Indians v. Utahpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. The State of Utah, the Utah State Department of Transportation, and the City of St. George, Utah (collectively the defendants), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Kunz and Company and the Shivwits Band of Paiute Indians holding that defendants lacked authority to regulate billboard advertising displays erected by Kunz on land held in trust by the federal go
Shivwits Band Of Paiute Indians v. Utahpublic domain
428 F.3d 966 SHIVWITS BAND OF PAIUTE INDIANS and Kunz & Company, d/b/a Kunz Outdoor Advertising, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim, Defendants-Appellees,v.State of UTAH; Utah State Department of Transportation; St. George City, a Utah Municipal corporation, Defendants-Counterclaim, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Gayle Norton, in her capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Neal A. McCaleb, in his capacity as Assistant Sec
State v. Nortonpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Respondent, v. LONNIE NORTON, Petitioner. No. 20180514