⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “State of Utah v. Norton”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005-02-08 · Published · cited 26× · 396 F.3d 1281; 2005 WL 290089
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Wilderness Society, New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Arizona Wilderness Alliance, Friends of Nevada Wilderness, and Colorado Environmental Coalition (collectively SUWA), and the National Resources Defense Council, Biodiversity Conservation Alliance, California Wilderness Coalition, and Idaho Conservation Leagu
State v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018-05-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 UT App 82; 427 P.3d 312
POHLMAN, Judge: ¶1 Lonnie Norton appeals his convictions arising from events that occurred over one night in November 2012 when he broke into his parents-in-law's house, kidnapped his estranged wife (Wife), and sexually assaulted her. Norton alleges several errors related to the jury instructions and sentencing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Oc
State v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2015-10-29 · Published · cited 9× · 2015 UT App 263; 361 P.3d 719; 798 Utah Adv. Rep. 22; 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 282; 2015 WL 6567672
*721 Opinion DAVIS, Judge: I 1 David Andrew Norton appeals from the district court's entry of consecutive sentences. Norton argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during sentencing and that but for his counsel's deficient performance, the court would not have impos
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 980; 124 S. Ct. 462
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 980
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-06-14 · Published · cited 1584× · 159 L. Ed. 2d 137; 124 S. Ct. 2373; 542 U.S. 55; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4379; 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20034; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 370; 72 U.S.L.W. 4472
542 U.S. 55 (2004) NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., v. SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ET AL. No. 03-101. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 29, 2004. Decided June 14, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. *56 SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion for a un
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-08-29 · Published · cited 0× · 301 F.3d 1217; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20025; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 17900; 2002 WL 1980642
EBEL, Circuit Judge. The Southern Utah Wilderness Afiance and a number of other organizations (collectively, SUWA) brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Utah against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), alleging, among other claims, that the BLM violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-08-29 · Published · cited 19× · 301 F.3d 1217
301 F.3d 1217 SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, a Utah non-profit corporation; The Wilderness Society, a national non-profit corporation; Sierra Club, a California non-profit corporation; Great Old Broads for Wilderness, a Utah non-profit corporation; Wildlands CPR, a Montana non-profit corporation; Utah Council of Trout Unlimited, a Utah non-profit organization; American Lands Alliance, a national non-profit corporation; and Friends of the Abajos
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 980; 72 U.S.L.W. 3307; 124 S. Ct. 462; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9538; 157 L. Ed. 2d 370; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 8000
540 U.S. 980 NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.v.SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE ET AL. No. 03-101. Supreme Court of United States. November 3, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 10th Cir. 2
Jones v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-12-29 · Published · cited 192× · 809 F.3d 564; 2015 WL 9467018
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. This case arises from the death of Ute Tribe member Todd R. Murray on April 1, 2007, following a police pursuit. Murray’s parents Debra Jones and Arden Post, on behalf of themselves and Murray’s estate, brought a 13-count complaint in the district court alleging various constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, conspiracy to violate civil rights u
Norton v. Utahpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1984-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 466 U.S. 942; 104 S. Ct. 1923; 52 U.S.L.W. 3756; 80 L. Ed. 2d 470; 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1881
Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.
State v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003-03-27 · Published · cited 4× · 2003 UT App 88; 67 P.3d 1050; 2003 Utah App. LEXIS 30; 2003 WL 1562232
67 P.3d 1050 (2003) 2003 UT App 88 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Michael Allen NORTON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020109-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 27, 2003. *1051 Gary L. Bell, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Dean Saunders, Weber County Attorney's Office, Ogden, for Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-07-11 · Published · cited 23× · 862 F.3d 1236; 2017 WL 2952256; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12391
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the death of Todd Murray, a Ute tribal member, following a police pursuit on the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation (the “Reservation”). Murray’s parents, his estate, and the Ute Indian Tribe (the “Tribal Plaintiffs”) sued the officers involved in Ute *1241 <
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006-07-24 · Published · cited 44× · 455 F.3d 1094; 36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20146; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18547; 2006 WL 2045822
EBEL, Circuit Judge. In this case, Mountain States Legal Foundation (“MSLF”) challenges the legality of the 1996 creation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in southern Utah. Because we conclude that MSLF lacked standing to bring this claim, we dismiss the appeal. I. BACKGROUND A. The Monument
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 257 F. Supp. 2d 53; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20162; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5031; 2003 WL 1737547
257 F.Supp.2d 53 (2003) DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary, Department of the Interior, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-1544(JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2003. *56 Katherine A. Meyer, Eric R. Glitzenstein, Meyer & Glitzenstein, William J. Snape III, Def
Carcieri v. Nortonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-02-09 · Published · cited 30× · 398 F.3d 22; 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20035; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2046; 2005 WL 307676
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an administrative decision by the Secretary of the Interior to take into trust a 31-acre parcel of land located in Charlestown, Rhode Island (“the Parcel”)1 for the benefit of the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island. Plaintiffs-appellants Donald L. Carcieri, Governor of Rhode Island, the State of Rhode Island, and the Town of Charles-town, Rho
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A24-0271 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicholas Norton Engel, Appellant. Filed March 3, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005-11-09 · Published · cited 6× · 428 F.3d 966; 2005 WL 2995590
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. The State of Utah, the Utah State Department of Transportation, and the City of St. George, Utah (collectively the defendants), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Kunz and Company and the Shivwits Band of Paiute Indians holding that defendants lacked authority to regulate billboard advertising displays erected by Kunz on land held in trust by the federal go
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-11-09 · Published · cited 6× · 428 F.3d 966; 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20230; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24144
428 F.3d 966 SHIVWITS BAND OF PAIUTE INDIANS and Kunz & Company, d/b/a Kunz Outdoor Advertising, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim, Defendants-Appellees,v.State of UTAH; Utah State Department of Transportation; St. George City, a Utah Municipal corporation, Defendants-Counterclaim, Plaintiffs-Appellants,Gayle Norton, in her capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; Neal A. McCaleb, in his capacity as Assistant Sec
State v. Nortonpublic domain
Utah Supreme Court · 2020-07-13 · Published · cited 5× · 481 P.3d 445; 2020 UT 46
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2020 UT 46 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Respondent, v. LONNIE NORTON, Petitioner. No. 20180514