Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “State of Tennessee, ex rel. v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft”
03/13/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 4, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE, EX REL. HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, ET AL. V. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 16-1044-I Claudia Bonnyman, Chancellor
State ex rel. Yost v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaftpublic domain
[Cite as State ex rel. Yost v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, 2019-Ohio-5084.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, ex rel. [Dave Yost], : Ohio Attorney General, : Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 19AP-7 :
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Yost v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-2121.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a Louisiana diversity judgment rendered against appellant Willard E. Robertson (“Robertson”) and his wholly owned Louisiana corporation, appellant Willard E. Robertson Corporation, for flood and sewage damage caused to 368 cars owned by appellee Volkswagen of America, Inc. (“Volkswagen”), a New Jersey corporation, while the cars w
Everhart v. Merrick Mfg. II, L.L.C.public domain
[Cite as Everhart v. Merrick Mfg. II, L.L.C., 2022-Ohio-4626.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY DARRYL EVERHART : : Plaintiff-Appellant : Appellate Case No. 29520
Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Rippspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YUGA LABS, INC., No. 24-879 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cv-04355- JFW-JEM v. RYDER RIPPS; JEREMY CAHEN, OPINION Defendants - Appellant
Miranda L. Day v. Persels & Associates, LLCpublic domain
PRO, District Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in part: I concur in the judgment remanding this case to the district court, and I agree the magistrate judge abused his discretion when he approved the Settlement Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)(2). I write separately, however, because I woul
Charles Austin v. Extruded Aluminum Corp.public domain
Opinion issued February 19, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00435-CV ——————————— CHARLES AUSTIN, Appellant V. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CORP., Appellee On Appeal fro
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.public domain
653 F.3d 1066 (2011) COLLEGESOURCE, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACADEMYONE, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-56528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 8, 2010. Filed August 8, 2011. *1070 Alexander Papaefthimiou, Darr
Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER C. LEROY HANSEN, Senior District Judge. On June 22, 2012, Defendants Urban Outfitters, Inc.; UO.com, L.L.C.; Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc.; Anthropologie, Inc.; Antrhopologie.com, L.L.C.; Free People of PA, L.L.C.; and Freepeople.com, L.L.C. (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support (Doc. 33). Plainti
Miranda L. Day v. Persels & Associates, LLCpublic domain
Case: 12-11887 Date Filed: 09/10/2013 Page: 1 of 68 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-11887 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cv-02463-TGW MIRANDA L. DAY,
Strabala v. Zhangpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jay Marshall Strabala brought this action against Defendants Qiao Zhang and Zhou Shimiao (referred to collectively as “Defendants” and individually as “Zhang” and “Zhou”)1 alleging defamation and intentional interference with his business. The parties are former partners in an archi
WATERMAN, Justice. In this appeal, we must confront unsettled federal precedent to decide whether a Chinese tire manufacturer that sold thousands of tires in Iowa through an American distributor may be compelled to defend a lawsuit here consistent with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. The tire exploded as an Iowan was airing it up at his father’s busines
Clemente Properties, Inc. v. Pierluisi-Urrutiapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1922 CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC.; 21 IN RIGHT, INC.; ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR.; LUIS ROBERTO CLEMENTE; ROBERTO ENRIQUE CLEMENTE, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, in his official and individual capacity and as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; EILEEN M. VÉLEZ-VEGA, Secretary of
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1793 Filed March 6, 2015 DYLAN BOOK and KAREN BOOK, Appellants, vs. VOMA TIRE CORPORATION, HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY, IOWA TIRE, INC., HOLT SALES AND SERVICE, INC., SICE, S.p.A. and SICE AUTOMOTIVE Equipment Societa Italiana Costruzioni Elettromeccaniche S.I.C.E.-S.p.A, Defendants, and DOUBLESTAR DONGFENG TYRE COMPANY, LTD., Appellee. ---------------------
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. This case calls for us to decide whether R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (“Reynolds”), a North Carolina-based corporation that has operated in Washington for more than half a century, may be sued in Washington for its alleged participation in a worldwide conspiracy to deny the addictive and harmful effects of smoking. Nilo D. Tuazon was diagnosed with a chr
General Motors Corp. v. Ignacio Lopez De Arriortuapublic domain
948 F.Supp. 656 (1996) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and Adam Opel AG, Plaintiffs, v. Jose IGNACIO LOPEZ DE ARRIORTUA, et al., Defendants. No. 96-71038. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 26, 1996. *657 *658 *659 Eugene Dr
In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*166MEMORANDUM O’NEILL, District Judge In this long-running antitrust litigation, plaintiffs1 claim defendants acted in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act by conspiring “to set artificially-inflated prices” for fresh agaricus mushrooms, see Dkt. No. 185 at ¶ 93, and thro
John T. Preston and C Change Investments, LLC v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltzpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
Castillo v. St. Croix Basic Services, Inc., Basic Industries, Inc., Hovensa, LLC, and Amerada Hess Corporationpublic domain
FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST CROIX JUAN CASTILLO STIRLING CANNONIER J CASE NO SX 09 CV 299 ANDREW BRIDGEWATER ELISHA J MONDESIR ROGER CAUL JULIAN THOMAS J TIMOTHY DANIEL FELTON WARNER LUIS J COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION FULGENCIO JOHN STEEDLEY OLIVER J MARCELLE ELI RODRIGUEZ GRANTLEY J YOUNG ORAL STANLEY GERALD WELLS J JURY TRIAL DEMANDED AUBR