Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION RALPH R. ERICKSON, Chief Judge. I. Summary of Decision Original jurisdiction is vested in this court and not the court of appeals because the “Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters of the United States,” jointly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, h

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated petitions for review, the State of North Dakota (State), Great River Energy, and National Parks Conservation Association and Sierra Club (collectively Environmental Groups) challenge the final rule promulgated by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on April 6, 2012, see 77 Fed.Reg. 20,894-945 (the Final Rule). The

Case: 23-60069 Document: 570-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ March 25, 2

Case: 17-60088 Document: 417-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2023 Decided April 9, 2024 No. 22-1081 STATE OF OHIO, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND MICHAEL S. REGAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ADVANCED ENERGY UN

Case: 17-60088 Document: 00517030553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

Application for stay submitted to THE CHIEF JUSTICE and by him referred to *1000the Court granted. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units," 80 Fed. Reg. 64,662

Dissent by Judge WALLACE OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: Under the Clean Air Act (“the Act”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) must establish and periodically revise national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”). After NAAQS are promulgated, the agency designates whether geographic areas meet those NAAQS. At issue in this appeal are the NAAQS designations for sulfur diox

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. The plaintiffs in this case challenge the validity of Minnesota statute § 216H.03, subd. 3(2) and (3) on three grounds. They contend that the statute is preempted by the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 824, et seq., preempted by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq., and unconstitutional under the “dormant” Commerce Clause. The di

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1639 ___________________________ North Dakota Retail Association; North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association; Corner Post, Inc. Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Board of

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 7, 2017 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR TH

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 609–626 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 651–728 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 25, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

*720 Crothers, Justice. [¶1] Numerous landowners from the Buffalo area appeal from a district court judgment affirming the Department of Health’s decision to issue Rolling Green Family Farms an animal feeding operation (AFO) permit. The landowners argue the Department erred by issuing Rolling Green an 'AF

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2517 ___________________________ Breanna Berndsen; Kristen Elizabeth Joyce Campbell; Charly Dahlquist; Taylor Flaherty; Ryleigh Houston; Anna Kilponen; Rebekah Kolstad; Sarah LeCavalier; Alyssa MacMillan; Annelise Rice; Abigail Stanley lll

7/13/2022 10:29:37 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: old_20-1530.pdf 20-1530.pdf versus 89 pages (424 KB) 89 pages (

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 16, 2024 Decided June 26, 2026 No. 24-1050 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND LEE M. ZELDIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENTS ALLIANCE OF NURSES FOR

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 3, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court STATE OF UTAH, on behalf o