⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “State of Missouri v. People's Republic of China”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024-01-10 · Published · cited 3× · 90 F.4th 930
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2495 ___________________________ State of Missouri, ex rel. Andrew Bailey, in his official capacity as Missouri Attorney General Plaintiff - Appellant v. The Peop
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-10-27 · Published · cited 2× · 72 F. Supp. 3d 8; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152033; 2014 WL 5438117
MEMORANDUM ORDER DEBORAH A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Debbie Walters and Max Walters initiated this miscellaneous action requesting a judgment debtor examination of Defendant, the People’s Republic of China, in order to identify assets within the United States to satisfy an outstanding judgment that Plaintiffs secured against Defenda
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-12-02 · Published · cited 2× · 672 F. Supp. 2d 573; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116523; 2009 WL 4641810
672 F.Supp.2d 573 (2009) Debbie and Max WALTERS, Plaintiffs, v. The PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, Defendant. No. 18 Misc. 302. United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 2, 2009. OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Ltd., Bank of China, Ltd., and China Construction B
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-04-09 · Published · cited 35× · 87 F. Supp. 3d 286; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46395; 2015 WL 1570215
*288 MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge Plaintiffs Han Kim and Yong Seok Kim (“the Kims”) brought suit against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (“North Korea”) alleging claims under the terrorism exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), and North Korea failed to respond. The Kims’ motion for entry
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 IL App (1st) 160933
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-07-07 · Published · cited 263× · 651 F.3d 280; 2011 WL 2643697
651 F.3d 280 (2011) Debbie WALTERS, Max Walters, Plaintiffs-Petitioners-Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA, LTD., Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corporation, Respondents-Appellees, The People's Republic of China, Defendant.[*] Docket No. 10-806-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: December 1, 2010.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-07-07 · Published · cited 0×
10-806-cv Walters v. Indus. & Commercial Bank of China, Ltd. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2010 (Argued: December 1, 2010 Decided: July 7, 2011) Docket No. 10-806-cv DEBBIE WALTERS, MAX WA
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-09-08 · Published · cited 46× · 281 F. Supp. 2d 105; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15641; 2003 WL 22079527
281 F.Supp.2d 105 (2003) Anne DAMMARELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-2224 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 8, 2003. *106 *107 Stuart Henry Newberger, Crowell & Moring, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaint
District Court, District of Columbia · 1999-01-25 · Published · cited 236× · 999 F. Supp. 1; 1998 WL 111500
999 F.Supp. 1 (1998) Stephen M. FLATOW, Plaintiff, v. The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei, Ali Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, Ali Fallahian-Khuzestani, and John Does 1-99, Defendants. No. 97-396 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 11, 1998.
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/2025 6:14 PM No. 15-24-00120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1954 Submitted March 24, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 Amended September 14, 2021 CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA, TERRY BRANSTAD, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, BRENNA FINDLEY, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official Capacity, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper Count
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1954 Submitted March 24, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA, TERRY BRANSTAD, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, BRENNA FINDLEY, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official Capacity, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper County, Brad McCall, Judge. Defendants ap
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 124,378 125,084 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF KANSAS, LOUD LIGHT, KANSAS APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, INC., and TOPEKA INDEPENDENT LIVING RESOURCE CENTER, Appellants, v. SCOTT SCHWAB, in His Official Capacity a
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-06-18 · Published · cited 443× · 140 S. Ct. 1891; 207 L. Ed. 2d 353
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part IV. *1901 In the summer of 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced an immigration program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. That program allows certain unauthorized alie
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX
District Court, S.D. New York · 2000-01-07 · Published · cited 24× · 79 F. Supp. 2d 374; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111; 2000 WL 16954
79 F.Supp.2d 374 (2000) DAR EL-BINA ENGINEERING & CONTRACTING COMPANY, LTD. and Mishary Al-Kahlid & Partners International Company, W.L.L., Plaintiffs, v. THE REPUBLIC OF IRAQ, the Ministry of Local Government—the General Establishment for Implementing Water and Sewerage Projects of the Public of Iraq, the Ministry of Housing & Construction of the Republic of Iraq, and Al-Rafidain Bank, Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 58
District Court, N.D. California · 2001-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 169 F. Supp. 2d 1146; 2001 WL 1042866
169 F.Supp.2d 1146 (2001) SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC,[1] Plaintiff, v. DALIAN CHINA EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL CORP. LTD., d.b.a. China Express; U-Freight America Inc.; Gateway Cargo Service Center; and Does One through Ten, Defendants. No. C 99-04917 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 13, 2001. *1147
Supreme Court of the United States · 1955-04-18 · Published · cited 201× · 99 L. Ed. 2d 389; 75 S. Ct. 423; 348 U.S. 356; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1396
*357Mr. Justice Frankfurter delivered the opinion of the Court. The Shanghai-Nanking Railway Administration, an official agency of respondent Republic of China, established a $200,000 deposit account in 1948 with the New York head office of petitioner National City Bank of New York. Subsequently, respondent sought to withdraw the funds, but petitioner r
District Court, S.D. New York · 1996-03-13 · Published · cited 5× · 917 F. Supp. 271; 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1157; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2983; 1996 WL 112197
917 F.Supp. 271 (1996) SATCORP INTERNATIONAL GROUP and Sino American Trading Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. CHINA NATIONAL IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 4649 (LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 13, 1996. *272 Vincent J. Barra, Barra & Salz, New York City, for Plaintiffs. Hug
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951-06-12 · Published · cited 82× · 190 F.2d 334; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2421
FRANK, Circuit Judge. 1. Plaintiffs brought suit against but one defendant, the Express Company. The order, from which plaintiffs appeal, discharged that sole defendant “from any and all liability” to the plaintiffs. Thus there ended the plaintiffs’ action against the only person they had sued. As the district judge said in his opin