Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “State of Colorado v. Cater”
Norris v. University Of Colorado, Boulderpublic domain
Babcock, Judge Plaintiff William Norris filed suit against the University of Colorado, Boulder (the *1005"University") and its Chancellor Phillip P. DiStefano (collectively, "Defendants") alleging that Defendants: (1) violated Title IX of the Educations Amendments of 1972 ("Title IX"); (2) denied Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process
American Action Network, Inc. v. Cater America, LLCpublic domain
Re Document Nos.: 6, 9, 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Transfer; Finding as Moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Jurisdictional Discovery; and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and for Rule 37 Sanctions RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Wells v. Colorado Department of Transportationpublic domain
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Marion Wells appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing all her claims. She sued her former employer, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that the CDOT had taken various adverse actions against her in retaliation for her repe
Justice BENDER, dissenting: The majority adopts a two-part test to determine the constitutionality of a Commission decision to split a county. First, the Commission must have been "sufficiently attentive to county boundaries to meet the requirements of section 47(2)." To comply with this first prong of the test, the majority explains that the Commission must begin by allotting districts to counties that have s
Opinion by JUDGE DUNN {1 No doubt Colorado is a state blessed with natural beauty. Seeking, in their view, to highlight this beauty, several years ago artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude began a quest to install a large-scale art display over the Arkansas River (the Project). Over a decade after the initial application, the Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Reere-ation (Parks Division), through its Board,
988 P.2d 184 (1999) CITY OF ARVADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97CA1829. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. April 15, 1999. Certiorari Granted November 8, 1999. *186 Roberts & Zboyan, P.C., Thomas L. Roberts, Larry Curtis Smith, Denver, Colo
State of Iowa v. Allan Robert Sieverspublic domain
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–0413 Submitted November 13, 2024—Filed March 28, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Allan Robert Sievers, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge.
State of Iowa v. Allan Robert Sieverspublic domain
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–0413 Submitted November 13, 2024—Filed March 28, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Allan Robert Sievers, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge.
Page 1042 862 P.2d 1042 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Not-For-Profit Colorado Corporation, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE of the State of Colorado, The Division of Employment and Training, and Marcus P. Anderson, Respondents. No. 93CA0457.
Page 1042 862 P.2d 1042 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Not-For-Profit Colorado Corporation, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE of the State of Colorado, The Division of Employment and Training, and Marcus P. Anderson, Respondents. No. 93CA0457.</
ACCEPTED 03-15-00113-CV 5989837 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/8/2015
ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 5431694 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Delawareans for Educational Opportunity v. John Carney, Governor of the State of Delawarepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DELAWAREANS FOR EDUCATIONAL ) OPPORTUNITY and NAACP DELAWARE ) STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2018-0029-VCL ) JOHN CARNEY, Governor of the Stat
PER CURIAM. [¶ 1] Disciplinary Counsel and attorneys Edwin W.F. Dyer III and Anne E. Summers objected to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board, recommending Dyer and Summers be suspended from the practice of law for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 8.1(b) and each pay half of the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Dyer and Summers violated N.D.R. Prof. Condu
Gerald Lee Powers v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 1, 2011 Session GERALD LEE POWERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P27411 Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge No. W2009-01068-CCA-R3-PD - Filed February 22, 2012 The petitioner, Gerald Lee Powers, appeals the judgment of the Shelby County Criminal Court
State v. United States Army Corps of Engineerspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN J. THARP, JR., District Judge. A group of states bordering the Great Lakes seeks an order requiring the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (“District”) to take action — including immediately creating physical barriers in the waterways connecting Lake Michigan and the Mississippi River Basin — to prevent bighe
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Leigh Anne G. Manlove, Wsb 6-3441public domain
THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 27 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 April 4, 2023 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR, Petitioner, D-20-0009 v. LEIGH ANNE G. MANLOVE, WSB #6-3441, Respondent
Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Leigh Anne G. Manlove, Wsb 6-3441public domain
THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 27 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 April 4, 2023 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR, Petitioner, D-20-0009 v. LEIGH ANNE G. MANLOVE, WSB #6-3441, Respondent
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Briana Marquise Matthews v. State of Alabama (Appeal from St. Clair Circuit Court: CV-23-59; CL-2024-0288).public domain
Rel: April 25, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,