Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Harambee Community School, Inc. (“Harambee”) closed its doors without paying about $50,000 in unemployment contributions to the State of Wisconsin, Department of Workforce Development (“DWD”). DWD tried to collect the unpaid contributions from Harambee’s administrator, Lenora Smith Davis (the “Debtor”) under

PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, J. ¶ 28. (concurring). The majority opinion concludes that the judgment in favor of Paul Davis Restoration of Southeast Wisconsin, Inc. (Southeast), entered as the confirmation of an arbitration award against Paul Davis Restoration of Northeast Wisconsin (Northeast) (which is a "doing business as" (d/b/a) designation employed by EA Green Bay, LLC), is enforceable in a garnishment action agai

PER CURIAM. ¶1 Darwin Davis appeals from a judgment convicting him of four counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Davis raises multiple claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and due process violations. We conclude that Davis has failed to demonstrate prejudice on any of the ineffective assistance of counsel claims, and that

DUGAN, J. ¶1 Howard D. Davis appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, finding him guilty as a party to the crimes of first-degree reckless homicide and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, with both crimes having use of a dangerous weapon and repeat offender penalty enhancers. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.1 ¶2 On appeal, Howard

Affirmed.

GUNDRUM, J. ¶ 1. Larry Davis appeals from his judgment of conviction and the denial of his post-conviction motion.1 He contends the circuit court erred in denying his request for an additional twenty-three days of sentence credit and in ordering him to maintain "absolute sobriety" as a condition of extended supervision. We agree Davis is entitled to the sentence credit he seeks and reverse on that is

2021 WI App 65 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP731-CR Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. JOEL R. DAVIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Opinion Filed: August 19, 2021 Submitted on Briefs: February 18, 202

¶ 1. KESSLER, J. On May 26, 2013, Anthony Darnell Davis was charged with two counts of physical abuse of a child by recklessly causing great bodily harm.1 According to the criminal complaint, on May 14, 2013, L.D.'s mother, Lakiesha Bowie, took L.D. to Children's Hospital of Wisconsin because L.D. had blood in the whites of her eyes and redness around her eyes. It was t

POSNER, Circuit Judge. In 2007 the Village of Hobart, Wisconsin passed an ordinance assessing stormwater management fees on all parcels of land in the village, including those owned by the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin, an Indian tribe. The purpose of the assessment was to finance the construction and operation of a stormwater management system. The tribe sought a declaratory judgmen

KESSLER, J. ¶ 1. Kenneth M. Davis appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief. Davis contends that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of statements attributed to Davis but taken in violation of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981); (2) his first postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to raise the

1. APA claim regarding the EPA's withdrawal of its objections to the proposed permit The Tribe asserts in the proposed amended complaint that the EPA's decision to withdraw its objections to the assumed Section 404 permit was arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law under the APA. The APA authorizes suit by "a person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action ... to

HOOVER, PJ. ¶ 1. Ralph Davis appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon. Davis argues the search warrant for his home was invalid because it was based on an officer's prior warrantless entry into his home through an attached garage. The circuit court concluded the officer's warrantless entry was excused by the good faith exception, because the officer did not subjectively intend to enter the home or i

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.

783 N.W.2d 871 (2010) STATE v. DAVIS. No. 2008AP2135-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. January 14, 2010. Petition for review denied.

776 N.W.2d 287 (2009) 2009 WI App 174 STATE v. DAVIS.[1] No. 2008AP2135-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. October 22, 2009. Unpublished Opinion Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

768 N.W.2d 62 (2009) 2009 WI App 56 STATE v. DAVIS. No. 2007AP1329-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. March 24, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.

774 N.W.2d 475 (2009) 2009 WI App 141 STATE v. DAVIS[1]. No. 2008AP88. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. August 18, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed. NOTES [1] Petition for Review Filed.

769 N.W.2d 573 (2009) 2009 WI App 77 STATE v. DAVIS. No. 2008AP2189-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. April 29, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Reversed and remanded.

763 N.W.2d 559 (2009) 2009 WI App 27 STATE v. DAVIS. No. 2007AP2959. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. January 21, 2009. Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.