Cases

908 So.2d 1190 (2005) Tammy WICKS, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Appellee. No. 2D04-2727. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 31, 2005. Robert L. Donald, Law Office of Robert L. Donald; and Joseph R. Gaeta of Joseph R. Gaeta, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Jeffrey D. Kottkamp of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P

657 So.2d 932 (1995) Steve BRANDAUER, Appellant, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., Appellee. No. 94-02241. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 7, 1995. *933 David F. Garber, Naples, for appellant. Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellee. RYDER,

VILLANTI, Judge. Bethany Trace Owners’ Association, Inc. (the Association), appeals the final summary judgment entered in favor of Whispering Lakes I, LLC, and Watermen-Pin-nacle, Inc., in this case arising out of the ownership of certain lands associated with the Bethany Trace subdivision. Because the trial court entered summary judgment based on an interpretation of the rele

146 S.W.3d 861 (2004) 356 Ark. 76 RMP RENTALS v. METROPLEX, INC. No. 03-569. Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 12, 2004. *862 Warner, Smith & Harris, PLC, by: Jason T. Browning, Fort Smith, for appellant. Walters, Hamby & Verkamp, by: Michael Hamby, Greenwood, for appellee. BETTY C.

STUART, Justice. Steven Alan Kraselsky (“Steven”), personal representative of the estate of his deceased mother Marcia Kraselsky (“Marcia”), sued David Calderwood, M.D., and Dr. Calderwood’s employer, Huntsville Clinic, Inc., in the Madison Circuit Court, alleging that Dr. Calderwood committed medical malpractice while treating Marcia following her admittance to Huntsville Hospi

993 So.2d 1050 (2008) Louis A. FIORE and Jean H. Fiore, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Richard O. HILLIKER, Smoot, Adams, Edwards & Green, P.A., and Charles B. Edwards, Appellees. No. 2D06-1865. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 7, 2008. *1051 Robert L. Donald of Law Offices of Sherman & Donald

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-181 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA EVIDENCE CODE. [February 16, 2017] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report1 of The Florida Bar’s Code and Rules of Evidence Committee (Committee), concerning legislative changes to the Florida Evidence Code and to

POLSTON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I respectfully dissent because, unlike the majority, I would adopt the Daubert standard as the Legislature amended the Florida Evidence Code in 2013.17 The majority rejects replacing the Frye standard with the Daubert standard and gives its reason for doing so as “grave constitutional