Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5037 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00412-RC Filed On: March 28, 2025 Cathy A. Harris, in her personal capacity and in her o

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2073 Doc: 37 Filed: 04/28/2026 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2073 RICHARD P. HARROLD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LEWIS J. HAGEN, individually and in his official capacity as an Officer of the

229 Ga. 691 (1972) 194 S.E.2d 76 HARRIS v. THE STATE. 27454. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted September 13, 1972. Decided November 9, 1972. *692 Glenn Zell, William H. Alexander, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Morris H. Rosenberg, Joel M. Feldman, Do

LILES, Acting Chief Judge. Appellants, Robin Harris and James E. Harris, filed suit against William Robert Mosteller and Lewis Albert Fritter alleging damages for injuries received as a result of a rear-end collision by an automobile operated by William Mosteller and owned by Albert Fritter. Fritter filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted and this appeal followed. Appellee Fritter denied owne

PIERCE, Chief Judge. Appellants, Robin Harris and James E. Harris, Plaintiffs in the Court below, appeal an order granting a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Lewis Albert Fritter, one of the defendants below, in a law action. The question as to whether the order is an appealable final order or whether it is an interlocutory order from which an interlocutory appeal would lie has not been rais

225 Ga. 458 (1969) 169 S.E.2d 331 HARRIS v. THE STATE. 25248. Supreme Court of Georgia. Argued June 12, 1969. Decided July 10, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 24, 1969. Lucy S. Forrester, William H. Traylor, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Tony H. Hight, Arthur K. Bolton, Attor

576 So.2d 925 (1991) Judith G. STANTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-615. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 27, 1991. Clyde M. Collins, Jacksonville, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. WENTWORTH, Senior Judge. Judith G. Sta

660 P.2d 1197 (1983) Maurice F. STANTON, d/b/a Silverado Industries, and Marilyn W. Stanton, Appellants, v. Helmut FUCHS, d/b/a Fuchs Electric, Appellee. No. 6273. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 25, 1983. John Anthony Smith, Smith & Gruening, Inc., Anchorage, for appellants. Jeffrey H. Roth, Jensen, Harris & Roth, Anchorage, for appellee. Befor

Opinion POCHÉ, J. A jury found defendant Perro Peter Lewis guilty of kidnapping for robbery (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)), five counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), and five counts of vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851); the jury also found true half a dozen weapon use enhancement allegations (Pen. Code, § 12022). After defendant admitted two prior serious felony convictions, the trial court sentenced him to

88 Cal.Rptr.2d 231 (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 662 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Perro Peter LEWIS, Defendant and Appellant. No. A083095. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. August 25, 1999. Review Denied December 1, 1999.[**] *232 Mark Shenfield, under appointm

STREETER, J. *467*533Several applicants for benefits under the Medi-Cal program and an advocacy organization working on their behalf (plaintiffs) petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate compelling the California Department of Health Care Services

Harris-A v. State IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-95-007-CR

FILED 5/27/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia UNITED STATES DI

Littlejohn, Justice: The lower court held that the defendant-respondent, Harris Hicks, was the owner of radio equipment procured from the plaintiff-appellant, The General Electric Company. G.E. has appealed. It has been stipulated that G.E. brought an action against Hicks, seeking judgment for the remainder of the purchase price of radio equipment which it had sold to him. The purchase price of the equipm

MEMORANDUM OPINION PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge. Plaintiff Sandy Lewis alleges that he was arrested without probable cause on March 28, 1981 and held in custody on suspicion of being one “Murray Brown, alias Michael Lewis,” a person wanted for possession of controlled substances. Lewis asserts that the police determined through fingerprints that he was not Murray Brown but nevertheless charged him

126 Ga. App. 123 (1972) 190 S.E.2d 123 LEWIS v. THE STATE. 46804. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted January 3, 1972. Decided April 7, 1972. Rehearing Denied April 21, 1972. *125 M. C. Pritchard, for appellant. Dewey Hayes, District Attorney, Arthur K.

Opinion ELIA, J. In this case we are called upon to examine the relationship between “special needs trusts,” which allow certain individuals to qualify for public medical assistance under the federal Medicaid program, and the provisions entitling the state to recover the amounts it has paid to provide such assistance. Deborah Herting, trustee of the Alexandri

MURDOCK, Justice (concurring specially). I share many of the concerns expressed by my colleagues, not the least of which is the concern for religious liberty and the concern expressed by Justice Bolin in Part II of his writing. ' I write not to repeat those concerns, but to offer some related thoughts. [[Image here]] A group of judges can declare all it wants that two p

COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Justice. |,Appellants Barton Land Services, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of grantors of a mineral deed appeal the Van Burén County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees, SEECO, Inc., and the heirs, successors, and assigns of the deed’s grantee. |?For reversal, appellants argue that the circuit court erred in granting summary judgment a

743 N.W.2d 585 (2007) 277 Mich. App. 126 HARBOR PARK MARKET, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. William and Linda GRONDA, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Carleton Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Harbor Park Market, Inc., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. William and Linda Gronda, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Carleton Enterprises, Inc., Defendant.<