Cases

OPINION Sharon G. Lee, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which. Jeffrey S. Bivins, C. J., and Cornelia A. Clark and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. The primary issue presented is whether the Drug-Free School Zone Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-432, ap

STANLEY JORDAN * NO. 2021-CA-0473 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JOHN H. GIBSON AND CITY * FOURTH CIRCUIT HALL CODE ENFORCEMENT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* RBWBARTHOLOMEW-WOODS, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT I concur in the result.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 21, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STANLEY BERNARD GIBSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2009-B-1143 Monte Watkins, Judge No. M2014-00598-CCA-R3-CD – Filed June 23, 2015 The defendant, Stanley Bernard Gibson, was charged with the possession of but convicted of facili

STANLEY JORDAN * NO. 2021-CA-0473 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JOHN H. GIBSON AND CITY * FOURTH CIRCUIT HALL CODE ENFORCEMENT * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* RML LEDET, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT I concur in the result.

STANLEY JORDAN * NO. 2021-CA-0473 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JOHN H. GIBSON AND CITY * HALL CODE ENFORCEMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL D

352 S.W.3d 511 (2011) Mary HORN, Hugh Coleman, Ron Marchant, Bobbie J. Mitchell, and Andy Eads, in their Capacities as Denton County Judge and Commissioners of Denton County, Texas and Eric D. Stanley, Appellants, v. Al GIBSON, Appellee. No. 02-10-00300-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. August 29, 2011. Rehearing Overruled November 3, 2011.

Facts Joseph Gibson as Executor of the Estate of Cynthia Gibson (plaintiff) appeals from an order dismissing his claims on a motion for directed verdict. The claim arises from a 27 April 2003 visit by Cynthia Gibson1 (Cynthia) to an open house at Carolyn's Mill, an historic mill. Carolyn's Mill is owned by William B. Ussery, Carolyn B. Ussery, Carolyn's Mill, Inc., and Carolyn's Mill Condominium Association (to

DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAYOY, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs Peter and Cindy Boots (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this products liability action, alleging that a defective utility knife manufactured by Defendant Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“Defendant”) injured Plaintiff Peter Boots. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is presently before the Court.

04/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 21, 2018 Session KISHA DEAN TREZEVANT v. STANLEY H. TREZEVANT, III Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-13 Donna M. Fields, Judge No. W2017-00715-COA-R3

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 90-1-02980-4, Jerome M. Johnson, J., entered October 29, 1990. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

601 S.E.2d 848 (2004) 268 Ga. App. 377 GIBSON et al. v. REZVANPOUR et al. No. A04A0539. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 7, 2004. Certiorari Denied October 12, 2004. *849 Lawrence Bennett, Atlanta, for appellants. Swift, Currie, McGhee & Heirs, Stephen L. Cotter, Terry O. Brant

494 F.3d 1328 (2007) Phil ROSENSWEIG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO., INC., f.k.a. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-15325. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 9, 2007. *1329 Joseph Clay Coates, III, Bradford D. Kaufman, Greenberg, Traurig, P.A., West Palm

242 Wis.2d 267 (2001) 2001 WI App 71 626 N.W.2d 73 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeffrey S. GIBSON, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 00-2399-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs January 16, 2001. Decided February 6, 2001. *268

Re: Adv. D.I. No. 32 KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. INTRODUCTION The adversary proceeding is a peculiar one that presents the Court with an opportunity to discuss the fundamental elements of assumption of executory contracts under the Bankruptcy Code. In its simplest form, the issue before the Court is whether an executory contract that was neither affirmatively assumed nor

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants challenge this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 13321 on the ground that joinder of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Public School Employees’ Retirement System *160(“PSERS”) and the State

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 25, 2018. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00246-CV DAVID B. MCKINNON, NORTH PONDEROSA, LLC, BARBARA MARSHALL, LP, WILLIAM H. GIBSON, D. SCOTT MCKINNON, BARBARA F. MARSHALL, MARCIA STALLINGS, AND DONALD CARDWELL, Appellants V.

Order entered August 2, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00246-CV DAVID B. MCKINNON, NORTH PONDERSOA, LLC, BARBARA MARSHALL, LP, WILLIAM H. GIBSON, D. SCOTT MCKINNON, BARBARA F. MARSHALL, MARCIA STALLINGS AND DONALD CARDWELL, Appellants V.

MEMORANDUM ** Appellants (collectively ‘Yu Galan”) challenge the district court’s denial of their motion to vacate an arbitration award en*730tered against their brokerage, Appellee Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”). We affirm. We review de novo an order confirming or denying vacatur of an arbitration award. See Powera

Order entered September 18, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00246-CV DAVID B. MCKINNON, ET AL., Appellants V. BILL GURLEY, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Order entered June 10, 2016 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00246-CV DAVID B. MCKINNON, NORTH PONDERSOA, LLC, BARBARA MARSHALL, LP, WILLIAM H. GIBSON, D. SCOTT MCKINNON, BARBARA F. MARSHALL, MARCIA STALLINGS AND DONALD CARDWELL, Appellants V.