Cases

33 Mich. App. 169 (1971) 189 N.W.2d 722 BARBER v. TUOHY Docket No. 7259. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided April 27, 1971. Leave to appeal denied July 13, 1971. *171 Davidson, Gotshall, Kohl, Nelson, Secrest, Wardle & Lynch (by Richard H. Scholl), for plaintiffs.

(2007) Saro DAGHLIAN on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DEVRY UNIVERSITY, INC., Devry Inc., and Does 1 through and including 100, Defendants. No. CV 06-994 MMM (PJWx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 10, 2007. Order Denying Reconsideration, February 19, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge ERVIN and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Chief Judge: This case is a study in the tensions that can beset the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Ten owners of Meineke Discount Muffler franchises sued franchisor Meineke Disco

803 F.Supp. 259 (1992) Nancy J. STENDER, Diane Skillsky, Julie Valentine-Dunn, Reba Barber-Money, Irma Hernandez, Anita Martinez and Jon Gold on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LUCKY STORES, INC., Defendant. No. C-88-1467 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 18, 1992. *260

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge: Hensley Equipment Company, Inc., appeals from an adverse decision in a patent infringement action brought by Esco Corporation, assignee of United States Patent No. 2,919,506 (the “’506 patent”). 1 The suit concerns excavating teeth to be attached to the digging edge of power

155 F.3d 331 41 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1151 Kelly BROUSSARD; Jim Stephens; Mark Zuckerman; ArnoldFischthal; John Hagar; Vincent Matera; DenisWickham; Mary Ann Wickham; KenexCorporation; Ralph Yarusso,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.MEINEKE DISCOUNT MUFFLER SHOPS, INCORPORATED; New HorizonsAdvertising, Incorporated; GKN Parts Industries;GKN, plc; Ronald Smythe; Gene Zhiss;Ted Pearce, Defend

73 F.Supp.2d 540 (1999) RHOÔNE-POULENC AGRO S.A., Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY and Dekalb Genetics Corp., Defendants. No. 1:97CV1138. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. April 1, 1999. *541 Michael E. Ray, Winston-Salem, NC, Timothy G. Barber, Charlotte, NC, John F. Morrow, Winston-Salem, NC, Richard D. Levin, Wi

USCA11 Case: 21-12729 Date Filed: 10/06/2022 Page: 1 of 123 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12729 ____________________ NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE HOLDINGS LTD, a Bermuda Company, NCL (BAHAMAS), LTD., a Bermuda Company agent of Norwegian

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on SWEPI’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 31, 2014 (Doc. 21)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 3, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine issues of justiciability; (ii) whether Plaintiff

161 N.W.2d 842 (1968) Daniel EMERY and Mileda Emery dba The Main Diner, Appellants, v. HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL NO. 556, et al., Respondents. No. 40440. Supreme Court of Minnesota. September 13, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 31, 1968. *844 Raymond J. Kempe, St. Paul, for appellants. Robi

69 Ariz. 373 (1950) 214 P.2d 123 SLIGH et al. v. WATSON et ux. No. 5068. Supreme Court of Arizona. January 24, 1950. *376 Stanley Kimble, of Tucson, for appellants. Bob Barber and Franklin E. Vaughan, of Tucson, for appellees. THOMAS, Superior Judge. Mildred Sligh, doing business as Sl

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

505 F.Supp. 224 (1980) Joan Rance VUYANICH v. REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF DALLAS. Ellen JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF DALLAS. Nos. CA-3-6982-G, CA-3-7949-G. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. October 22, 1980. *225 *226 *2