Cases

ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this date, the Court considered Plaintiff David W. Standley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 42), Defendant Michael S. Rogers’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 41), and the corresponding responses and replies. After careful consideration, the Court will grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Plaintiffs Motion for Summ

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Jack Standley appeals from his sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Standley’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We provided Standley with an opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

MEMORANDUM * Jack Standley appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted distribution of Ox*729ycontin tablets in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Standley contends that the introduction into evidence of tape-recorded conversations between himself and a deceased confidential informant violated his right to confront a witnes

05/09/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2022 CHRISTINA ANN STANDLEY v. CARL ANTHONY STANDLEY Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 94CH1-2013CV-42725 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge ___________________________________

Gerber, Judge: Respondent determined a $12,983 Federal income tax deficiency for petitioners’ 1986 taxable year. The issues for our consideration are: (1) Whether amounts received, through a dairy termination program, in excess of the fair market value of cows are taxable as ordinary or capital gains income; (2) the fair market value of petitioners’ cows; and (3) whether petitioners are entitled to a dedu

Case: 21-2149 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 02/16/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VAUGHN HOEFLIN STANDLEY, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent ______________________ 2021-2149 ______________________ Petition for review of the

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-22-00126-CV ________________ SPRING FULTS, Appellant V. MARION LANE STANDLEY, Appellee ________________________________________

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Willamowski, Judge. {¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Nigle Standley, appeals the judgment of the Bellefontaine Municipal Court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Sharon Bickham, as executor of the estate of Leyette Neal. On appeal, Standley contends that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment, th

OPINION Opinion by: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice. Former Real County constable Bethel Standley, appellant, sued the county judge, W.B. Sansom, and other county officials, (hereinafter referred to as “the county,”) for trespass to try title to the office of constable, and for salary and benefits of the office of constable. Standley also sued for violations of the Texas Open Meetings Act. A jury found Standley h

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00011-CR STANDLEY DELANO DAVIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 270

ROGERS, Circuit Judge: Melissa Standley appeals the judgment on her tort claims for D.C. Public Library Special Police Officer Karen EdmondsLeach and the District of Columbia on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in allowing the defendants to call a witness they failed to identify prior to trial in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a). St

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00645-CR Lloyd Standley, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-09-904065, HONORABLE BRENDA KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00645-CR Lloyd Standley, Appellant v. <

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioners to consolidate this case with No. 86-1217, Russoniello et al. v. Olagues et al. [certiorari granted, 481 U. S. 1012], denied. Certiorari denied.

W. JONES, Justice. I. Nature Of The Case Appellant, Charles DeGroot and DeGroot Farms, LLC (collectively “DeGroot”), appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment on its claims against Standley Trenching, Inc. d/b/a Standley & Co. (“Standley”), relating to the construction and installation of a manure handling system at the DeGroot dairy. Be