Cases

272 B.R. 917 (2001) IN RE STANDING ORDER WITH REASONS REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO THE DISCHARGE UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 727 AND PURPORTED SETTLEMENT OF ACTIONS. Ford Motor Credit Company v. Randall Shane Johnson. Ford Motor Credit Company v. Randall Shane Johnson. Civ.A. Nos. 01-1213, 01-1295. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. December 20,

Vermont Superior Court Filed 09/01 23 Washmgton mt VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT £3: CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES DEAN WALTON, SR., § LINDA JANE MCGEE, and § NICHOLAS CAVNAR as personal § No. 273, 2020 representative for the estate of § JAMES D. WALTON JR., and § Court Below—Superior Court KENNETH A. BRYANT, III, as § of the State of Delaware personal representative for the estate § of RICHARD GREGORY § C.A. No. N18C-04-314 CHIT

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 7, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENT

Slip Op. 25-14 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE YOUR STANDING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 24-00055 Defendant, and MID CONTINENT STEEL & WIRE, INC., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION [Sustaining the Department of

Filed 6/6/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE KARLA VELARDE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G063626 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023-01323484) MONROE OPERATIONS, LLC, OPINION et al., Defendants and Appellants. Ap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PRESS COALITION’S MOTION Miscellaneous Action No. 21-87 (BAH) FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell 21-28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a petition submitted on behalf of fifteen media organizations (“the P

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C.J. *5 *912 Under both California and federal law, the question whether an individual worker should properly be classified as an employee or, instead, as an independent contractor ha

FOR PUBLICATION JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT ‘IN RE APPROVAL OF THE JUDICIAL EMERGENCY ORDER DECLARED IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before: THOMAS, Chief GirouttTndse, BYBEE, IKUTA, SMITH, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, MARTINEZ, PHILLIPS, and SEABRIGHT, Chief District Judges; and LEW, Senior District Judge On March 17, 2020, Chief Judge Larry A. Burns declared a thirty-day judicial emergency in the Southern District of California pursuant to 18 U

FOR PUBLICATION JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE APPROVAL OF THE JUDICIAL EMERGENCY DECLARED IN THE EASTERN ORDER DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge, BYBEE, IKUTA, N. R. SMITH, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, MARTINEZ, PHILLIPS, and SEABRIGHT, Chief District Judges, and LEW, Senior District Judge On March 17, 2010, Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller declared a judicial emergency in the Eastern District of California pursuan

USCA11 Case: 21-11765 Document: 82-1 Date Filed: 10/31/2024 Page: 1 of 41 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11765 ____________________ HOWARD SCHLEIDER, FELICE VINARUB,

REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT REGARDING A JUDICIAL EMERGENCY IN THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Submitted to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3174(d)(1) April 9, 2020 On March 13, 2020, Chief District Judge Virginia A. Phillips declared a judicial emergency in the Central District of California under 18 U.S.C. § 3174(e). She reported that under the e

OPINION Restani, Judge: This matter is before the court on plaintiff Ethan Allen Operations, Inc.’s (“Ethan Allen”) motion for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. See Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of PL Ethan Allen Operations, Inc.’s CIT Rule 56.2 Mot. for J. on the Agency R., ECF No. 29

Slip Op. 25-46 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 21-00215 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Reco

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 4, 2020 Decided January 26, 2021 No. 20-5197 STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE , ET AL., APPELLEES v. UNITED STATES A RMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, APPELLANT DAKOTA A CCESS LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 20-5201

OPINION & ORDER HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Skedco, Inc. brings this action against Defendant' Strategic Operations, Inc., alleging that Defendant infringes three claims of United ■ States Patent No. 8,342,652 (“the '852 Patent”), which discloses a system for simulating hemorrhages in the training of first responders. The United States, through the Secretary of .the Army, owns the

Barteau, Senior Judge *337 Statement of the Case [1] Appellant Jeffery Certa appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Steak 'n Shake. 1 We reverse and remand. Issue

OPINION OF THE COURT Charles E. Ramos, J. In motion sequence 005, defendants Standing General Commission on Christian Unity and Interreligious Concerns (GCCUIC) and Stephen J. Sidorak, Jr. move pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment to dismiss the action. Background This case arises from the alleged improper termination of the employment of the plaintiff W Douglas

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE BARBER Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Ronnie Hale was employed by Appellee/Cross-Appel-lant, CDR Operations, Inc., for approximately three months as a bulldozer operator. Before that, Hale had worked as a bulldozer operator for various other employers for approximately 30 years. Hale filed a workers’ compensation claim against CDR alleging cumulative trauma and an injury date of Feb

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Two months ago, this Court determined that oil could continue to flow through the Dakota Access Pipeline while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers conducted further environmental analyses. See Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Stan