Cases

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE AMERICAN BOTTLING ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N19C-03-048 AML CCLD ) BA SPORTS NUTRITION, LLC and ) THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, ) )

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 26, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARY BETH MONTERA, Nos. 22-16375 individually and on behalf of all others 22-16622 similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:16-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant / 06980-RS Cross-Appellee, v. OPINION PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION, FKA Joint Juice, Inc.,

No. 122,833 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STEVIE KUCHARSKI-BERGER, Appellant, v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The court's role in reviewing a motion to dismiss

MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disability Act to protect people with disabilities from discrimination in places of public accommodation. Since then, a bevy of administrative orders and court decisions have helped businesses understand how to apply the ADA to their brick-and-mortar stores. But as more and more people take their shopping online, regulations have fallen further

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. Xlear, Inc. and Focus Nutrition, LLC are both in the business of selling sweeteners that use the sugar alcohol xylitol. Xlear filed a complaint raising a trade dress infringement claim under the Lanham Act, a claim under the Utah Truth in Advertising Act (UTIAA), and a claim under the

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Patrick Andrew Witte brings this action against defendants General Nutrition Company and GNC Parent, LLC, alleging that defendants engaged in an unlawful trade practice in violation of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“DCCPPA”), D.C. Code § 2

PERLUSS, P. J. *120Code of Civil Procedure section 128.51 authorizes a trial court to award sanctions for bad faith actions or tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause delay. Pursuant to former subdivision (f) of section 128.5, effective from January 1, 2015 until amended by urgency legislation enacted

Filed 1/31/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN NUTRITION DISTRIBUTION, B280983 LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC616482) v. SOUTHERN SARMS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles Court, Mich

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Some years ago, Plaintiff Innovation Ventures (Innovation), manufacturer of 5-Hour Energy, settled a lawsuit with the now-defunct Custom Nutrition Laboratories (Custom Nutrition) by entering into a noncompete agreement. When Nutrition Science Laboratories (NSL) subsequently purchased Custom Nutrition's assets, it did not abide by the restrictive covenant

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Defendants are nutritional supplement companies that manufacture and market Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (“SARM”) with effects similar to those of anabolic steroids. Doc. 20, ¶¶ 1, 19. Plaintiff, a competing nutritional supplement company, asserts that Defendants have violated the Lanham Act by engaging in false advertising of O

Opinion DONDERO, J. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, the Environmental Law Foundation (ELF), filed a complaint against Beech-Nut Nutrition Corporation and various other food manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, seeking enforcement of the provisions of the *312 <

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SCHALL. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge RADER. SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (col*1338lectively, “Novozymes”) and DefendantsAppellees DuPont Nutrition Biosciences APS, Genencor International Wisconsin, Inc., D

734 N.W.2d 719 (2007) 273 Neb. 943 The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL NUTRITION, INC., appellant. No. S-06-063. Supreme Court of Nebraska. July 13, 2007. *721 James L. Quinlan, David J. Stubstad, and Russell A. Westerhold, of Fraser, Stryker, Meusey, Olson, Boyer & Bloch, P.C.,

27 So.3d 489 (2009) Marcella SPARKS v. TOTAL BODY ESSENTIAL NUTRITION, INC., et al. Cindi Howard, Marion Howard, and Joshua Taylor v. Total Body Essential Nutrition, Inc., et al. 1071708. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 17, 2009. *490 Jeffrey C. Rickard and Thomas M. Powell of Marsh, Rickard & Bryan, P.C., Birmingh

OPINION JESSON, Judge Relator Partners in Nutrition challenges a decision by respondent Minnesota De*567partment of Education (MDE) denying relator’s application to sponsor multiple sites under the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) based on a determination that Partners in Nutrition is not a financially viable organization. Because

OPINION JESSON, Judge Relator Partners in Nutrition challenges a decision by respondent Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) denying relator’s application to sponsor multiple sites under the, federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) based on a determination that Partners in Nutrition is not a financially viable organization. Because MDE’s rejection of Partners in Nutrition’s application does no

202 F.Supp.2d 431 (2002) NUTRITION & FITNESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARK NUTRITIONALS, INC., Defendant and Counterclaimant. No. 1:01CV00924. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 25, 2002. *432 *433 Charles A. Burke, David H. Read, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, Wins

[Cite as State v. Smith-Parks, 2025-Ohio-2877.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 25AP-409 (C.P.C. No. 25CR-2200) v. :

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Richard Watkins appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against his federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) retaliation claim and his state tortious interference with contract claim. We AFFIRM, though on different grounds than those relied on by the district court. I. Watkins is a former management employee of Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. (a wholl