⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Stacey F Walker”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-12-20 · Published · cited 53× · 911 F.3d 550
LOKEN, Circuit Judge, dissents. SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. *552 Appellant Jeffrey Walker appeals the district court's judgment, which affirmed the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) denying him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income unde
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 329 F. App'x 469
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Demetrius Renee Walker appeals the district court’s orders denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 329 F. App'x 469
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Demetrius Renee Walker appeals the district court’s orders denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
State v. Staceypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020-02-26 · Published · cited 3× · 302 Or. App. 470; 459 P.3d 261
470 Argued and submitted September 30, 2019, affirmed February 26, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RAY WILLIAM STACEY, Defendant-Appellant. Lake County Circuit Court 15CR46674; A167612 459 P3d 261 Defendant appeals a judgme
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND, and Opinion Filed June 27, 2024. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00135-CV DIANE PIWKO, Appellant V. STACEY ACEVEDO, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court
Briggs v. Walkerpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2000-02-15 · Published · cited 1× · 88 F. Supp. 2d 1196; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4319; 2000 WL 340253
88 F.Supp.2d 1196 (2000) Susan BRIGGS, Plaintiff, v. Sheila WALKER, Director of Vehicles, Department of Revenue of the State of Kansas, Defendant. No. 99-4064-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 15, 2000. *1197 Stacey L. Cooper, Topeka Independent, Living Resource Center, Topeka, KS, Cecilia T. Mariani, Topeka
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-08-16 · Published · cited 142× · 45 F.4th 759
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2030 Doc: 68 Filed: 08/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 56 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2030 KESHA T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STACEY A. KINCAID, in her official capacity; XIN WANG, NP
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-10-07 · Published · cited 1× · 50 F.4th 429
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2030 Doc: 68 Filed: 08/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 56 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2030 KESHA T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STACEY A. KINCAID, in her official capacity; XIN WANG, NP
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-12-05 · Published · cited 20× · 63 F. Supp. 3d 301; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170019; 2014 WL 6883049
DECISION & ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Two parents bring this suit against numerous employees of the Administration of Children’s Services (“ACS”), the former ACS Commissioner, and the City of New York. Based on the events surrounding the removal of their two infant children in 2009, the parents, Plaintiffs Junior Walker and Thaera Bullen-Walker,1
In re B.F. and T.F.public domain
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2024-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
FILED November 6, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2021-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00020-CV Mark Seiler, Appellant v. Stacey Seiler, Appellee FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-18-005170, THE HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
District Court, D. Maryland · 2001-04-04 · Published · cited 4× · 170 F. Supp. 2d 541; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8257; 2001 WL 359535
170 F.Supp.2d 541 (2001) John WALKER and Patricia Walker, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF SALISBURY, Roger Baskerville, William Stacey, O. Palmer Gillis, III, and Frank Himelright, Defendants Civil No. H-01-162. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 4, 2001. *542 *543 Peter A. Wimbrow, III, L
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2020 Term _____________________ FILED March 26, 2020 No. 18-0987 released at 3:00 p.m. _____________________ EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
Davis v. Walkerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001-08-14 · Published · cited 0× · 15 F. App'x 168
PER CURIAM. Robert Lee Davis appeals the district court’s orders denying his civil action, motion to reconsider, and “opposition” to District Judge Osteen ruling on his action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See No. 99-2577, Davis v. Walker; No. CA-98-116-7F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 1999; O
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004-12-22 · Published · cited 35× · 395 F.3d 229; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26801; 2004 WL 2958313
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: The Republic of Congo (“ROC”) refuses to pay a judgment it owes Walker International Holdings Limited (“Walker”). In an effort to collect its judgment, Walker filed a garnishment action against Murphy Exploration & Production, International (“Murphy”), which owed the ROC money. Walker appeals the district court’s decision dismissing the action
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 9, 2003 STACEY F. BALDON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit for Lauderdale County No. 6755 Joseph H. Walker, Judge No. W2003-00763-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 21, 2004 The petitioner, Stacey Baldon, appeals from the trial court's denial of post-co
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-04-01 · Published · cited 78× · 487 S.W.3d 170; 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 566; 2016 WL 1267580; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 235
Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the Court. In recent years this Court has sought to protect the constitutional right *173 to a trial by jury by requiring trial courts to provide litigants with “an understandable, reasonably specific explanation” for setting aside a jury v
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 22-12028 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 10/17/2025 Page: 1 of 55 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12028 ____________________ STACEY BRIDGES, CH
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 417 F.3d 1267
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. The appellants, foreign corporations that purchased vitamin products outside of the United States for distribution in foreign countries from the appellee foreign manufacturers, brought this action asserting, inter alia, price fixing in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l.1 The district court dismissed the Sherman Act claim for lack of sub
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-06-15 · Published · cited 174× · 180 F.3d 1065; 52 Fed. R. Serv. 657; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4706; 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1219; 99 Daily Journal DAR 5981; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13129; 1999 WL 387245
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: This case requires resolution of whether the de novo standard of review set out in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989) for an insurance disability case brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), encompasses both plan interpretations and factual determinations. More specifically,