Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STABIL LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. Case No. 1:22-cv-00983 (TNM) RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Respondent. MEMORANDUM ORDER Petitioners are a group of eleven Ukrainian companies (“the Companies”) that owned and operated petrol stations in

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 4, 2025 Decided February 13, 2026 No. 25-7005 STABIL LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:22-cv-00983)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JSC DTEK KRYMENERGO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-03330 (CJN) RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION JSC DTEK Krymenergo, a Ukrainian energy supplier, initiated this action to confirm an arbitral award that it secured against the Russian Feder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT : SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 24-2523 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 23, 31

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NJSC NAFTOGAZ OF UKRAINE, et al., Petitioners, Civ. A. No. 23-1828 (JDB) v. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Nearly a decade ago, several Ukrainian companies (collectively, “NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine” or “petitioners”) initiated a

SUMMARY ORDER The facts and procedural history underlying this action have been fully set forth by the District Court and this Court in prior proceedings. Compagnie Noga D’Importation et D’Exportation S.A. v. Russian Federation, 361 F.3d 676, 678-83 (2d Cir.2004); 2002 WL 31106345, at *1-5 (S.D.N.Y. Sept.19, 2002). We assume familiarity by the parties as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate

SUMMARY ORDER The facts and procedural history underlying this action have been fully set forth by the District Court and this Court in prior proceedings. Compagnie Noga D’Importation et D’Exportation S.A. v. Russian Federation, 361 F.3d 676, 678-83 (2d Cir.2004); 2002 WL 31106345, at *1-5 (S.D.N.Y. Sept.19, 2002). We assume familiarity by the parties as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-471L (Filed: December 3, 2021) (Nunc Pro Tunc: March 23, 2021) *************************************** ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC * et al., * Trails Act; Indiana Law; Property Interest * Conveyed via Release Executed Purs

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-471L (Filed: March 23, 2021) *************************************** ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC * et al., * Trails Act; Indiana Law; Property Interest * Conveyed via Release Executed Pursuant Plaintiffs, * to Ra

NIBCO alleges that Viega has wielded its dominance in the carbon steel press fittings market to control the copper press fittings market. (Id. ¶ 71). NIBCO avers that Viega has made sale of its carbon steel press fittings contingent on the customer's agreement not to purchase copper press fittings from NIBCO. (See id. ¶ 72). NIBCO also avers that, in some instances, Viega charges penalties in the form of lost discounts or outright

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Builders Trust of New México’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed November 17, 2016 (Doc. 4)(“MTD”); and (ii) Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed December 6, 2016 (Doc. 10)(“Motion for Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on'January 23, 2017." The primary is

794 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) WORLD HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Defendant. Case No. 08-20198-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. June 5, 2011. *1308 Michael E. Elsner, John M. Eubanks, Vincent I. Parrett, Motley Rice LLC, Mt. Pleasant, SC, Samuel Johnathan Dubbin, Dubbin &

STAHL, Circuit Judge: This case arises from efforts by Plaintiff-Appellee, World Holdings, LLC *1312 (“World Holdings”), to obtain payment on certain bonds issued by Appellant, the Federal Republic of Germany (“Germany”). Germany now appeals the denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of subject

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING BLES MOTION TO DISMISS THE TRUSTEE’S COMPLAINT BURTON R. LIFLAND, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the motion (the “Motion to Dismiss”) of the Taiwanese Bureau of Labor Insurance (“BLI”) seeking to dismiss the complaint (the “Complaint”) of Irving H. Picard, Esq. (the “Trustee”), trustee for the substantively consolidated Securities Investor Protection Ac

293 F.Supp.2d 569 (2003) EMERGENCY FUEL, LLC, et al. v. PENNZOIL-QUAKER STATE CO. No. CIV.A. CCB-00-156. United States District Court, D. Maryland. December 11, 2003. *570 *571 *572 James Elwood Armstrong, IV, Armstrong Westerman and Hattori LLP, Washington

ACCEPTED 02-17-00358-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 12/21/2017 11:10 AM

227 F.Supp.2d 494 (2002) X-IT PRODUCTS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. WALTER KIDDE PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, INC., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 2:00cv513. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. June 25, 2002. *495 *496 *497

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 15, 2020 Decided January 8, 2021 No. 19-5278 CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., APPELLEE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:17-cv

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-400L (Filed: December 3, 2021) (Nunc Pro Tunc: March 23, 2021) *************************************** ELIZABETH G. BRADLEY et al., * Trails Act; Indiana Law; Property Interest * Conveyed via Release Executed Pursuant Plaintiffs,