⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “St. John v. Atty.Gen. of U.S.”

Op. Atty. Gen. 3apublic domain
Minnesota Attorney General Reports · 2023-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
Minnesota law prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies from holding someone based on an immigration detainer if the person would otherwise be released from custody. Minn. Stat. §§ 629.30; .34 3-a February 6, 2025 John J. Choi Ramsey County Attorney 360 Wabasha Street North, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55102-1418 Re: Request for Advisory Opini
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 1034
[Cite as Keil v. Ohio Atty. Gen., 2025-Ohio-1034.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Michael Werner Keil et al., : Relators, : No. 24AP-654 v. : (REG
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-04-10 · Published · cited 71× · 782 F.3d 1016; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5812; 2015 WL 1600472
RILEY, Chief Judge. St. Louis Effort for AIDS, Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri (Planned Parenthood) (collectively, appellees), and a number of other individuals and entities brought this facial challenge to Missouri’s Health Insurance Marketplace Innovation Act (HI-MIA), Mo.Rev.Stat. § 376.2000 et seq. The plaintiffs sought
Ohio Court of Claims · 2023-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ohio 3142
[Cite as Zacharias v. Ohio Atty. Gen., 2023-Ohio-3142.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO JERRY ZACHARIAS Case No. 2021-00141JD Plaintiff Judge Lisa L. Sadler v. DECISION OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL Defendant {¶1} On April 17, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that it is entit
Minnesota Attorney General Reports · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLIC UTILITIES: ELECTRICITY – LIGHT & POWER: DELINQUENT BILLS: Municipal utilities must use reasonable methods to compel payment for services and utility service may not be disconnected other than for good cause. Op. Atty. Gen. 624c-4 (Nov. 2, 1938) superseded. 624c-4 (cr.ref. 624d-5) John T. Shockley May 16, 2019 Page 2
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 11-3357 _____________ MICHEL SYLVAIN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; BRIAN ELWOOD, Warden of Monmouth County Jail; CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, Field Office Director; JOHN MORTON, Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and SECRET
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991-12-16 · Published · cited 6× · 951 F.2d 232; 91 Daily Journal DAR 15408; 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 334; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29185; 1991 WL 262413
PER CURIAM: The government appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It argues the district court erred in holding the government must assess a deficiency in a taxpayer’s tax within a reasonable period of time, and therefore in submitting to the jury an interrogatory asking whether the government had done so in the St. John’s
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 91-4477. Felix Gonzalez GISBERT, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee. April 28, 1993. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020-12-22 · Published · cited 7× · 243 A.3d 880; 2020 ME 142
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2020 ME 142 Docket: Pen-20-48 Argued: November 18, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HUMPHREY, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. JOHN DE ST. CROIX GORMAN, J. [¶1] In March of 2018, John De St. Croix locked two people into the ca
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-07-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 Ohio 3369
[Cite as State ex rel. Atty. Gen. v. Vela, 2014-Ohio-3369.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., JUDGES: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. John W. Wise, J. Pla
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-24-2009 Ndayshimiye v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or No
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-20-2008 Augustin v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-P
Minnesota Attorney General Reports · 2025-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
SHERIFFS; DUTIES AND AUTHORITY; Minnesota law does not authorize sheriffs to enter agreements under section 287(g) of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. Instead, a county may execute a 287(g) agreement if the agreement is approved by a resolution of the county board of commissioners; Minnesota law prohibits local law enforcement officers from detaining or holding persons based solely on ICE civil immigration detainers regardless of whether the law enforcement agency is operating under
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1990-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 745 F. Supp. 1165; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13216; 1990 WL 145731
ORDER ROBERT D. POTTER, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion, filed September 26, 1990, for stay of execution of state sentence pending resolution by this Court of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The record in this matter indicates a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was filed by Petitioners on August 31, 1990. The Petition indicates that Pet
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-26-2005 Jordan v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Pre
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-29-2005 Chen v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Prec
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-8-2004 Ponnapula v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-P
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-11-01 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-1-2004 Ambartsoumian v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-15-2005 Bonhometre v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-24-2004 Shardar v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Pr