Cases

ORDER Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company’s (“Aetna”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 32). In the motion, Aetna contends that summary judgment should be entered because the decision to terminate long term disability benefits was not wrong. In the alternative, Aetna contends that summary judgment should

MEMORANDUM MALACHY E. MANNION, United States District Judge Pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Doc. 14, Doc. 17). Based upon the court’s review of the motions and related materials, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be denied and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted. By way of relevant background, on Decem

MEMORANDUM In Re Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 51); Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 52) JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. Helene Clarke (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against Unum Life Insurance Company of America and the Pearson, Inc. Employee Long Term Disability Plan (“Defendants”) seeking reinstatement of long-term disability

110 F.Supp.2d 458 (2000) Jeanette HINES, Plaintiff v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 99CV00174. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. August 11, 2000. *459 *460 John M. Lamie, Abingdon, VA, for Plaintiff. William F. Rutherford, Jr

759 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2011) Brent OSTER, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY; The Lucasfilm Ltd. Group Long Term Disability Plan, Defendants. Case No. C 09-00851 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. January 5, 2011. *1175 Terrence J. Coleman, Brian H. Kim, Pillsbury & Levinson, LLP, San Fra

701 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) Yvette BRAVO, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN the CITY OF NEW YORK; and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. No. CIV S-08-1982 LKK/EFB. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 26, 2010. *1147 John M. Riestenberg, Law Offices of John M. Riestenberg, Sacramento,

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. Mar-Ya Zuke commenced action against defendants, American Airlines, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”) and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (the “Plan Administrator” or “MetLife”), challenging the termination of her long-term disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. On a motion for

470 F.3d 250 Paul SCARBROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MORGAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Perry Spurling, Individually, Randy Harlan, Individually, Deborah Lively, Individually, and Conrad Strand, Individually, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-6302. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 25, 2005. Decided and Filed: November 22

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Paul Scarbrough, the former elected school superintendent for Morgan County, Tennessee, was not appointed to the new position as the Director of Schools for the county system following the publication of a newspaper article which announced that he would be the featured speaker at a convention sponsored by a church wit

143 Argued and submitted November 13, 2019, at David Douglas High School, Portland, Oregon; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed, judgment of circuit court vacated, and case remanded to circuit court October 22, 2020 Olivia CHERNAIK, a minor and resident of Lane County, Oregon; Lisa Chernaik, guardian of Olivia Chernaik; Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, a minor and resident of Lan

COLE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court which GILMAN, J., joined. KETHLEDGE, J. (pg. 552), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Raymond Shaw sued defendant AT & T Umbrella Benefit Plan (“the Plan”), alleging that the Plan denied his claim for long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income

Paul G. Gardephe, United States District Judge In this action, Mindspirit, LLC, and its two members - Malvika Kumar and Rosewood Partners - allege that Defendant Evalueserve Ltd. breached an agreement to issue 480,000 Evalueserve stock options to Mindspirit. According to Plaintiffs, although Evalueserve issued these options to Mindspirit in April 2001, it later breached the parties' agreement by wrongfully re-issuing these stock opt

634 F.Supp.2d 663 (2009) Octave SCHULLY v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, et al. Civil Action No. 07-1456. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 29, 2009. *665 Joseph S. Piacun, Thomas A. Gennusa, II, Gennusa, Piacun & Ruli, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff. Virginia N. Roddy, Jennifer M. Lawrence, Preaus, Roddy

615 F.Supp.2d 143 (2009) Corinthians R. GUY, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 2682 (FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 15, 2009. *145 Corinthians R. Guy, New York, NY, pro se. Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher, United States Attorney's Office, New York, NY

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00063-CV Carroll L. Lee, Peggy G. Lee, Lee Concho Valley Family L.P., Sandra Cagle, Jerry D. Lee, Larry G. Lee, and Matthew Lee, Appellants v. Memorial Production Operating, LLC; Grandfield Consulting, Inc.; Boaz Energy, LLC; and Ivory Energy, LLC; Appellees FROM THE 51ST D

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ■ -John J. Tharp, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff A.H. is a high school runner with cerebral palsy. Although he competes as a member of his school’s track team during the regular season, he has sued the Illinois High School Association (“IHSA”), which runs the state track and field championship and other events, seeking two accommodations for his disability: that I

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District • Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The court conducted a non-jury trial in this case on May 5-8, 11-14, and 27-29, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the following constitute the court’s Findings of Fact (“Findings”) and Conclusions of Law (“Conclusions”). To' the extent any Finding

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff DeMarco Nichols filed this lawsuit under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, against the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and the Illinois Department of Central Management System (CMS). IDOT is Nichols.’s former employer, and CMS is a state agency with responsibility for overseeing and implementing the sta

(2008) Anthony SUARATO, Plaintiff, v. BUILDING SERVICES 32BJ PENSION FUND, Defendant. No. 06 Civ. 5031(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 27, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro Se plaintiff Anthony Suarato brings this action alleging that defendant Building Services 32BJ Pe

687 F.Supp.2d 396 (2010) Ann CORREALE-ENGLEHART, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 3113(RJS)(MHD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 8, 2010. *401 Gabriel Jacob Hermann, Ingerman Smith, L.L.P., Hauppauge, NY, for Plaintiff. Susan Colleen Branagan, S