Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Spicer v. New Image International, Inc.”
Spicer v. New Image International, Inc.public domain
447 F.Supp.2d 1226 (2006) Stephen SPICER, Plaintiff, v. NEW IMAGE INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. New Image International, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, v. Atrium, Inc., and Aspen Group, Inc., Third Party Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-2184-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 18, 2006. *1227
Sam Spicer v. Stace Thompsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 2004 Session SAM SPICER, ET AL. v. STACE THOMPSON, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 40350 Clara Willis Byrd, Judge No. M2002-03110-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 7, 2004 Appellant Don Pickard appeals the action of the trial cou
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International, Inc.public domain
562 F.Supp. 775 (1983) APPLE COMPUTER, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. FORMULA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation, Defendant. No. CV82-5015-IH. United States District Court, C.D. California. April 25, 1983. *776 Brown & Bain by Jack E. Brown, Phoenix, Ariz., Lois W. Abraham, Palo Alto, Cal., and Blake
New Jersey Coalition of Health Care Professionals, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Banking & Insurancepublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P. J.A.D. These consolidated appeals raise facial challenges to the validity of regulations adopted by respondent, New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, Division of Insurance (DOBI), pursuant to the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act, L. 1998, c. 21 (AICRA). This court and our Supreme Court denied applications for a stay of the regulatio
United States v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM: John King and Tammy Drummond (collectively, “Relators”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Sol-vay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., on their False Claims Act (“FCA”) claims and a subsequent ruling that partly granted court costs to Solvay. For the reasons explained below, we AFFIRM. I.Background
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________________ ) AFRICARE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 17-cv-1712 (RMC) ) XEROX COMPLETE DOCUMENT ) SOLUTIONS MA
MMM Healthcare, Inc. v. Santiago (In re Santiago)public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Edward A. Godoy, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs/counterclaim-defendants MMM Healthcare, Inc. (“MMM”) and PMC Medicare Choice, Inc. (“PMC”) and defen-*462dani/counterclaimant Dr. Virgilio Cora Santiago (“Dr. Cora”), the debtor in the underlying bankruptcy ca
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: The trial in this case offers two narratives. One of a hardworking man who, angered by failures of guardrails installed across the United States—with sometimes devastating consequences—persuaded a Texas jury of a concealed cause of those failures. The other of the inventive genius of professors at Texas A&M’s Trans
Wu v. Pearson Education, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge. Norbert Wu (“Wu”) brings two purported class action suits under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, on behalf of photographers who have had their copyrights infringed by Pearson Education, Inc. (“Pearson”), a textbook publisher. In the first action, 09 Civ. 6557 (hereinafter “Wu /”), Wu alleges that Pearson engaged in a wide
ASARCO, LLC v. Montana Resources, Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Montana Resources, Inc. and Montana Resources, LLP.1 [Doc. No. 28; Br. in Supp., Doc. No. 24; Supplement to Mot., Doc. No. 78]. Having reviewed the motion, the response
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: In 2005, Merix Pharmaceutical Corporation hired a company called PRACS Institute, Ltd. to conduct a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing Releev, a herpes drug manufactured by Merix, to a placebo. PRACS hired Clinical Supplies Management, Inc. (CSM), the defendant in this case, to receive the clinical supplies an
ORDER ON RELATORS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING ABOUT ELECTRONIC FORMAT DISPUTE, DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF RE: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM BACKUP TAPES AND THE FORMAT USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF EMAIL, AND RE-LATORS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL BRIEFING ABOUT BACKUP TAPES DISPUTE WILLIAM V. GALLO, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION
Jowers v. BOC Group, Inc.public domain
608 F.Supp.2d 724 (2009) Robert & Donna JOWERS, Plaintiffs, v. BOC GROUP, INC., Esab Group, Inc., and Lincoln Electric Co., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-0036. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. April 1, 2009. *728 Scott O. Nelson, Maples & Lomax, PA, Pascagoula, MS, Christopher T. Robertson
Abigail Bacon v. Avis Budget Group Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 18-3780 ______________ ABIGAIL BACON; ARCADIA LEE; JEANNINE DEVRIES; LISA GEARY; RICHARD ALEXANDER; YVONNE WHEELER; GEORGE DAVIDSON, and on behalf of themselves and the putative class v. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.;
Wielgus v. Dover Industries, Inc.public domain
OPINION CAIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which CANTRELL, P.J., M.S., and KOCH, J., joined. Appellants in this action are Stephen F. Wielgus, Jr. and wife, Jeanie K. Wielgus. After Mr. Wielgus suffered an on-the-job injury, Appellants sued Dover Industries, Inc., manufacturer of a certain
Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.public domain
141 F.Supp.2d 288 (2001) PITNEY BOWES, INC., Plaintiff v. HEWLETT-PACKARD CO., Defendant. No. CIV.A.3-95CV1764(JCH). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 1, 2001. *289 *290 Michael J. Dorney, Jacqueline D. Bucar, Tyler, Cooper & Alcron, New Haven, CT, Michael V. Ciresi, James
720 F.Supp. 1505 (1989) In re AIR CRASH DISASTER AT STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, DENVER, COLORADO, ON NOVEMBER 15, 1987. MDL No. 751. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 7, 1989. Opinion on Amended Judgment and Prejudgment Interest June 7, 1989. Order on Motions to Reconsider July 18, 1989.
Matter of Lake States Commodities, Inc.public domain
936 F.Supp. 1461 (1996) In the Matter of LAKE STATES COMMODITIES, INC., Consolidated Pretrial Proceeding. No. 96 C 0587. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 24, 1996. *1462 *1463 Arthur W. Aufmann, Edward T Joyce & Assoc., Chicago, Illinois. John S. Bishof, C