Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Spencer v. C R Bard Inc”
C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Atrium Medical Corporationpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT C.R. BARD, INC., No. 23-16020 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- 00284-DGC v. ATRIUM MEDICAL OPINION CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District J
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in fifteen of the actions listed on Schedule A pending in seven districts move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Southern District of Ohio or, alternatively, the Wester
MISSOULA YWCA v. Bardpublic domain
983 P.2d 933 (1999) 1999 MT 177 MISSOULA YWCA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Allen BARD, Defendant and Respondent. No. 98-256. Supreme Court of Montana. Heard April 12, 1999. Submitted April 20, 1999. Decided July 27, 1999. Jon E. Ellingson (argued), Missoula, Montana, for Appellant. R.J. "Jim" Sewell, J
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 55 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 June 6, 2023 AMY ELISE EVANS f/k/a AMY ELISE SHARPE, Appellant (Plaintiff), S-22-0244 v. SPENCER STEVEN SHARPE, Appellee (Defend
Figueroa v. Merscorp, Inc.public domain
766 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) Ignacio Damian FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. MERSCORP, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 10-61296-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. January 31, 2011. *1307 Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Andrew Benjamin Boese, Robert Mark Brochin, Morgan, Lewis &a;
George Par v. Wolfe Clinic, P.C.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2286 ___________________________ George Par; IVYR, PLLC, doing business as Par Retina Plaintiffs - Appellants v. Wolfe Clinic, P.C.; Jared S. Nielsen; Kyle J. Alliman; David D. Saggau
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BARD IVC FILTERS No. 22-15872 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION, D.C. No. 2:15- md-02641-DGC ------------------------------ DORIS JONES; et al *, OPINION Plaintiffs, and LAW OFFICES OF BEN C.
Spencer Lucas v. Burleson Publishing Company, Inc., D/B/A Burleson Star, James Moody, Sally Ellertson, Shelley Grantpublic domain
OPINION DISMISSING APPEAL VANCE, Justice. We dismiss this interlocutory appeal from a partial summary judgment for want of jurisdiction. Spencer Lucas (“Lucas”) sued Burleson Publishing Company, Inc. (“the newspaper”), which publishes the Burleson Star, its publisher James Moody and employee Sally Ehertson (“the employees”), and
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2017COA31 Court of Appeals No. 16CA0101 City and County of Broomfield District Court No. 14CV30139 Honorable C. Scott Crabtree, Judge Broomfield Senior Living Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and Sunrise Development, Inc., LLC, a Virginia corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. R.G. Brinkmann Company, d/b/a Brinkmann Constructors, a Missouri corporation, Defendant-Appellee. JUDGMENT
709 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) AQUA-LUNG AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN UNDERWATER PRODUCTS, INC., d/b/a Oceanic, a California Corporation; and Two Forty Deuce Corporation, a Colorado Corporation, Defendants. No. C 07-02346 RS. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. April 28, 2010. *77
Voda v. Medtronic Inc.public domain
ORDER TIM LEONARD, District Judge. Plaintiff, Dr. Jan K. Voda, is the holder of United States Patent No. 6,083,213 (“the '213 patent”), which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 4, 2000. Exhibit 1 to Complaint (Doc. No. 1). The '213 patent contains method claims; that is, it relates to plaintiffs inventive technique for using a guiding catheter to perform angioplast
Brokaw v. Davol Inc.public domain
DECISION Before this Court is Plaintiffs', Barbara Brokaw, Raymond Mutz, Tammy Oakley, and Delza Young, (Plaintiffs) Rule 37 motion to compel Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc. (collectively "Defendant") to produce a confidential audit report of their quality systems conducted by an outside consultant. At issue is whether Defendant may assert a previously unknown privilege — the self-critical analysis privil
Harlan Laboratories, Inc. v. Campbellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Harlan Laboratories, Inc. (“Harlan”) has moved for a preliminary injunction enforcing the terms of a one-year non-competition agreement with Defendant Gerald Campbell, a former regional sales manager, who is now employed by Defendant Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (“Charles River”), a competito
Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. v. Brazabrapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Mich & Mich. TGR, Inc. (“plaintiff’) commenced this action alleging that defendant Brazabra, Corp. (“defendant” or “Brazabra”) are infringing upon plaintiffs “Bra Strap Retainer,” U.S. Reissue Patent No. 43,766 by, inter alia, knowingly and willingly importing into the United States, selling, and causing to be sold, and offering for sale
Krauser v. Evollution IP Holdings, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH A. MARRA, District Judge. This cause is before the Court upon Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss or Transfer (DE 45). The Court has reviewed the briefs and the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. I. Background This case involves competing claims of ownership and inventorship of a dental implant syst
Genentech, Inc. v. INSMED INCORPORATEDpublic domain
436 F.Supp.2d 1080 (2006) GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Tercica, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. INSMED INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation; Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Insured Therapeutic Proteins, a Colorado Corporation, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims. No. C 04-5429 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California.
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.public domain
(2008) LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Multimedia Patent Trust, Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. and Related Claims. No. 06-CV-0684-H (CAB). United States District Court, S.D. California. February 12, 2008. ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. This case involves claims and counterclaims for
Montes v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.public domain
481 F.Supp.2d 700 (2006) Gilbert MONTES, Plaintiff, v. PHELPS DODGE INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a Phelps Dodge Copper Products, a/k/a Phelps Dodge Smelting Rod Refining a/k/a Phelps Dodge Mining Company El Paso Operations a/k/a Phelps Dodge Copper Products, and Phelps Dodge Corporation, Defendants. No. EP-05-CA-0053 KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. Septe
Pehr v. Rubbermaid, Inc.public domain
87 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2000) Harold T. PEHR, Plaintiff, v. RUBBERMAID, INC., Defendant. No. 99-2089-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 8, 2000. *1223 Michael Elbein, Kent R. Erickson, Litman, Kraai & Brown, L.L.C., Kansas City, MO, Douglas M. Weems, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Kansas City, MO, Mark M. Gros
Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.public domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 03-1615 NTP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. James H. Wallace, Jr., Wiley, Rein & Fielding LLP, of Wash