⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Sparks v. Nelnet”

District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 956 F. Supp. 2d 581; 86 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 171; 2013 WL 3892700; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105608
OPINION McNULTY, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, which is pleaded as a class action. Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and *582others similarly situated, alleges that Defendants have “caused to be sent thousands of unsolicited fax advertisements for goods and/or services without pro
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-03-28 · Published · cited 3× · 936 F. Supp. 2d 272; 2013 WL 1285408; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45025
OPINION AND ORDER SEIBEL, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion of Defendants Alloy, Inc. and Channel One, LLC to dismiss the Complaint (“Compl.”) of Plaintiff Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and New York General Business Law (“GBL”) '§ 396-aa.1 (Doc. 20.) For the reasons stated below, Def
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013-12-20 · Published · cited 23× · 296 F.R.D. 299; 2013 WL 6726742; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178950
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: [[Image here]] I. INTRODUCTION This action is a putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, on behalf of persons who received unsolicited fax advertisements from Defendant David Randall Associates, Inc. (“David Randall”) and its owner Defendant Raymond Miley, III, (hereafter “Defe