⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Soward v. The & Trust”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-23 · Published · cited 2× · 573 F.3d 891; 2009 WL 2182898
573 F.3d 891 (2009) In the Matter of the ARBITRATION BETWEEN, Leonard BOSACK; Sandy Lerner; Cartesian Partners LP; the Leonard Bosack Trust; the Sandy Lerner Trust; Richard Troiano; the & Trust; & Capital Partners; the Leonard X. Bosack and Bette M. Kruger Charitable Foundation, Inc.; Capital Inc, Petitioners-Appellants, v. David C. SOWARD; & Management Company, Respondents-Appellees. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between, Leon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-26 · Published · cited 129× · 586 F.3d 1096; 2009 WL 3416227
586 F.3d 1096 (2009) In the Matter of the Arbitration Between, Leonard BOSACK; Sandy Lerner; Cartesian Partners LP; The Leonard Bosack Trust; The Sandy Lerner Trust; Richard Troiano; The & Trust; & Capital Partners; The Leonard X. Bosack and Bette M. Kruger Charitable Foundation, Inc.; Capital Inc., Petitioners-Appellants, v. David C. SOWARD; & Management Company, Respondents-Appellees. In The Matter of The Arbitration Between, Le
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN THE MATTER OF THE  ARBITRATION BETWEEN, LEONARD BOSACK; SANDY LERNER; CARTESIAN PARTNERS LP; THE LEONARD BOSACK TRUST; THE SANDY LERNER TRUST; RICHARD TROIANO; THE & TRUST; & CAPITAL No. 08-35248  PARTNERS; THE LEONARD X. BOSACK AND BETTE M. KRUGER D.C. No. CHARITABLE FOUND
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN THE MATTER OF THE  ARBITRATION BETWEEN, LEONARD BOSACK; SANDY LERNER; CARTESIAN PARTNERS LP; THE LEONARD BOSACK TRUST; THE SANDY LERNER TRUST; RICHARD TROIANO; THE & TRUST; & CAPITAL No. 08-35248  PARTNERS; THE LEONARD X. BOSACK AND BETTE M. KRUGER D.C. No. CHARITABLE FOUND
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993-02-16 · Published · cited 26× · 427 S.E.2d 646; 310 S.C. 473; 1993 S.C. LEXIS 32
427 S.E.2d 646 (1993) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for Heritage Federal Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, v. EAGLE LAKE AND GOLF CONDOMIIUMS, A South Carolina Limited Partnership, Allen W. May, Peggy W. May, Coker Builders, Inc., and Eagle Lake and Golf Condominiums Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondents, v. COKER BUILDERS, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael B. CALLAHAN, Kathleen B. Callahan,
Idaho Supreme Court · 2026-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 52190 SPIRIT LAKE CABINS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Boise, January 2026 Term ) and ) Opinion filed: May 7, 2026 ) GERALD NEESER, trustee of the Ger
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017-11-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2017 Term FILED November 14, 2017 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 16-1163 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPRE
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-01-03 · Published · cited 0×
No. _____________ FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS In the Court of Appeals AUSTIN, TEXAS for the Fifteenth District of Texas 1/3/2025 4:01:27 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 306 F. App'x 401
MEMORANDUM ** Sharon and Alfred LaPeter (“LaPeter”), as trustees of the LaPeter 1985 Living Trust, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Canada Life Insurance Company of America (“Canada Life”) on LaPeter’s contract claims concerning the refinancing of his loan for the ParkCenter Mall in Boise, Idaho (the “Mall”). We affirm the judgment of the district court, and we award Canada Life attor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 306 F. App'x 401
MEMORANDUM ** Sharon and Alfred LaPeter (“LaPeter”), as trustees of the LaPeter 1985 Living Trust, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Canada Life Insurance Company of America (“Canada Life”) on LaPeter’s contract claims concerning the refinancing of his loan for the ParkCenter Mall in Boise, Idaho (the “Mall”). We affirm the judgment of the district court, and we award Canada Life attor
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011-08-05 · Published · cited 38× · 801 N.W.2d 570; 2011 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 56
MANSFIELD, Justice. The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a right to punitive damages survives the death of the wrongdoer. On several previous occasions, we have held that punitive damages may not be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor. See Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co., 282 N.W.2d 639, 661 (Iowa 1979); Wolder v. Rahm, 249 N.W.2d 630, 632 (Iowa 1977); Stevenson v. Stoufer,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-12-18 · Published · cited 171× · 702 F.3d 286; 34 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1230; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 25742; 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,707; 2012 WL 6582389
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 12a0409p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JEFF DYE, TAMMIE ERSKINE, PATRICK HALL,
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2015-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4925658 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-00077-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ABEL LUCIO, JR., ET AL, Appellants, v. THE JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, Appellee. On appeal from the 135th Distric
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01886-SCT HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA AND HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY v. OLA MAE APPLEWHITE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF DOROTHY MAE APPLEWHITE, DECEASED, CEOLA WADE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF ANTHONY J. STEWART, DECEASED, AND KENNETH CORDELL CARTER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AND WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFI
District Court, D. Idaho · 2011-08-05 · Published · cited 1× · 837 F. Supp. 2d 1145; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87290; 2011 WL 3439163
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it the Boy Scout Defendants’ motion to strike the Second Amended Complaint, or, in the alternative, to dismiss Counts 3 and 4 of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 126), the Boy Scout Defendants’ motion to strike response (Dkt. 132), and the LDS Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Dkt. 141).
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011-09-02 · Published · cited 0× · 805 N.W.2d 145; 2011 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 67
APPEL, Justice. In this case, we consider the scope of the State’s authority under Iowa Code chapter 804 to detain a person whom the State asserts is a material witness to a crime. The district court concluded that the authority of the State to detain a material witness is extinguished when a trial date is set for the underlying crime and the material witness is served with a subpoena. The State sought an interlocutory appeal
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-08-00077-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIS
Hart v. Sowardpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1853-01-04 · Published · cited 0× · 53 Ky. 301
Judge Simpson delivered the opinion of the court. In January 1850, Margaretta Gorsuch, who owned a considerable estate consisting of land, slaves, and personalty, intermarried with Alfred So ward. She died tn May 1851, intestate, without any issue, Ieaving her husband surviving. Prior to their'marrriage, but in contemplation thereof, the parties executed the following anti-nuptial agreement, which was after-