Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sowa v. Eli Lilly and Company”
Eli Lilly and Co. v. SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.public domain
705 F.Supp.2d 971 (2010) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., Defendants. No. 1:06-cv-238-SEB-DML. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 31, 2010. *975 Alissa Keely Lipton, Jessica Ruth Underwood, Krist
364 F.Supp.2d 820 (2005) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY INDUSTRIES LTD., Plaintiffs, v. ZENITH GOLDLINE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Defendants. No. 1:01 CV 443 RLY-VSS. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. April 14, 2005. *821
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.public domain
100 F.Supp.2d 917 (1999) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Apotex, Inc., Interpharm, Inc., Bernard C. Sherman and Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. No. IP-96-0491-C-B/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. January 12, 1999. *918 Jan M. Carroll, Barnes & Thornb
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
696 F.Supp. 1033 (1988) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-5393. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 21, 1988. Timothy J. Malloy, Lawrence M. Jarvis, Gregory J. Vogler, Chicago, Ill., Richard G. Schneider, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Philip S. Johnson, Albert W. Preston, John J. Mackiewicz,
Mimedx Grp., Inc. v. Tissue Transplant Tech., Ltd.public domain
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this patent case, plaintiff MiMedx sued defendants Bone Bank Allografts ("Bone Bank") and Texas Human Biologies, Ltd. ("THB") for infringement of United States Patent Nos. 8,597,687 ("the '687 Patent") and 8,709,494 ("the '494 Patent"). These patents pertain to a product line of tissue grafts that are processed from human amniotic me
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. PERRIGO COMPANYpublic domain
697 F.Supp.2d 600 (2010) GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, and 3M Innovative Properties Co., Plaintiffs, v. PERRIGO COMPANY, Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and Nycomed U.S. Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 2:10-cv-937. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 8, 2010. *602 Robert Novak, Edwards, Angell, Palmer and
Mintz v. Dietz & Watson, Inc.public domain
RADER, Chief Judge. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Package Concepts & Materials, Inc.’s (“PCM”) motion for summary judgment on invalidity and non-infringement against Neil Mintz, Marcus Mintz, and Jif-Pak Manufacturing, Inc. (collectively, “Mintz”). This court affirms the non-infringement determination and vacates the inval
Alloc, Inc. v. Norman D. Lifton Co.public domain
653 F.Supp.2d 469 (2009) ALLOC, INC., Berry Finance, N.V., and Välinge Aluminum AB, Plaintiffs, v. NORMAN D. LIFTON CO., Balta U.S., Inc. and Balterio, N.V., Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 4419(PAC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 8, 2009. *472 Charles Bart Cummings, Baker & McKenzie LLP, NY, NY, Daniel J. O'
New Medium LLC v. Barco N.V.public domain
(2008) NEW MEDIUM LLC, AV Technologies, LLC, J. Carl Cooper, Pixel Instruments Corporation, IP Innovation LLC, and Technology Licensing Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BARCO N.V., and Syntax-Brillian Corporation, Defendants. No. 05 C 5620. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 16, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD A. POSN
GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. Perrigo Co.public domain
722 F.Supp.2d 566 (2010) GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, and 3M Innovative Properties Co., Plaintiffs, v. PERRIGO COMPANY, Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd., and Nycomed U.S. Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-00937. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 10, 2010. *568 Arnold B. Calmann, Katherine Ann Escanla
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1549C (E-Filed: December 20, 2019) ) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ) FLORIDA, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ) ) Patent; Invalidity and Government Plaintiff, )
741 F.Supp.2d 865 (2010) BONE CARE INTERNATIONAL, LLC and Genzyme Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PENTECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and Cobrek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. Case No.: 08-cv-1083. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 17, 2010. *868 Christina Anne Larissa Schwarz, Christopher E. Loh
Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. v. GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP.public domain
813 F.Supp.2d 602 (2011) ASAHI GLASS CO., LTD. and AGC Flat Glass North America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP., Defendant. Civ. No. 09-515-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. September 26, 2011. *605 Steven J. Balick, Esquire, John G. Day, Esquire, Lauren E. Maguire, Esquire and Andrew C. Mayo, Esquir
Judkins v. HT Window Fashions Corp.public domain
624 F.Supp.2d 427 (2009) Ren JUDKINS, Plaintiff, v. HT WINDOW FASHIONS CORP., Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-0251. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 19, 2009. Order Denying Reconsideration June 25, 2009. *431 Bryan H. Opalko, Lynn J. Alstadt, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Pittsburgh, PA,
Applera Corp. v. MJ Research Inc.public domain
363 F.Supp.2d 261 (2005) APPLERA CORPORATION and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., plaintiffs, v. MJ RESEARCH INC. and Michael and John Finney, defendants. No. 3:98CV1201 (JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 30, 2005. *262 Aimee Jennifer Wood, James T. Shearin, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, Asim Varma,
Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.public domain
575 F.3d 1312 (2009) EXERGEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. Hana Microelectronics Co., Ltd., and CVS Corporation, Defendants, and S.A.A.T. Systems Application of Advanced Technology, Ltd. and Daiwa Products, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 2006-1491, 2007-1180. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. August 4, 2009. <
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I, LLC (“IV I”) and Intellectual Ventures II, LLC (“IV II”) (collectively “IV”) brought this patent infringement action against defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) on October 6, 2011, alleging infringement 0f sjx patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,810,144 (“the 144 patent”), 6,412,953 (“the ’953 patent”),
Butamax™ Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2011, plaintiff ButamaxTM Advanced Biofuels LLC (“Butamax”) filed suit in this district against defendant Gevo, Inc. (“Gevo”) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,851,188 (“the '188 patent”). (D.I. 1) The '188 patent discloses and claims “a recombinant microorganism having an engineered isobutanol
(2008) BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.; David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Counterclaimant, v. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., David Goldfarb, M.D., and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterdefendants. No. CV 03-0597-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. July 29, 2008. <
Safco Products Co. v. Welcom Products, Inc.public domain
799 F.Supp.2d 967 (2011) SAFCO PRODUCTS CO., Plaintiff, v. WELCOM PRODUCTS, INC., John Evanthes, Kerry Welsh, and Yan Jian Shunhe Industrial Co., Ltd., Defendants. Civil No. 08-4918 (SRN/JJG). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 1, 2011. *970 Felicia J. Boyd, and Aaron A. Myers, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Minneapoli