Cases

PER CURIAM. Hempstead County Hunting Club (HCHC) filed a citizen’s suit against Southwestern Electric Power Company (SWEPCO) pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671, seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction to prevent SWEPCO from commencing construction, constructing, or continuing construction of its 600-megawatt pulverized coal-fired power plant in He

STUART KYLE DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: *1003 Steam-electric power plants generate most of the electricity used in our nation and, sadly, an unhealthy share of the pollution discharged into our nation's waters. To control this pollution, the Clean Water Act,

Case: 23-60069 Document: 570-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ March 25, 2

Case: 17-60088 Document: 00517030553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

Case: 18-60116 Document: 00515144673 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 3, 2019 No. 18-60116

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued March 21, 2024 Decided September 3, 2024 No. 22-1271 UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT SIERRA CLUB, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 22-1302, 22-1303 On Petiti

Case: 18-60079 Document: 00515094677 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 28, 2019 No.

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0056 ══════════ CPS Energy, Petitioner, v. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents important questions affecting the allocation by the Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) of hydroelectric power produced by certain federal water projects. SWPA is a federal power marketing agency within the Department of Energy. Plaintiff-appellant Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. performs the generating and transmission functions for a score of electric cooperatives se

819 F.2d 537 96 A.L.R.Fed. 397 BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees,andSouthwestern Power Resources Association, Inc., et al.,Intervenors-Appellees. No. 86-1059. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 18, 1987.

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Defendant Louisville Gas & Electric brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) challenging the district court’s order refusing to dismiss state law nuisance, trespass, and negligence claims that defendant argued were preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. That order must be affirmed under today’s hol

Memokandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss [DN 29] of Louisville Gas and Electric Company (“LG & E”) and PPL Corporation (“PPL”). Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background This case involves the

*290RUTH BADER GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: In this case, we confront an attempt by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) to adjust to this court’s decision in Middle South Energy, Inc. v. FERC, 747 F.2d 763 (D.C.Cir. 1984), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 22, 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985

ACCEPTED 15-24-00118-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion issued May 11, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00188-CV ——————————— IN RE MAURICIO GUTIERREZ AND NRG ENERGY, INC., Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus ***

22 F.3d 1125 38 ERC 1481, 306 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 62USLW 2697,24 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,836 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner,v.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Carol M. Browner,Administrator, EPA, Respondents.NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner,v.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Carol M. Browner,Administrator, EPA, Respondents,Alabama Power Company; A

909 F.Supp. 1241 (1993) INTERSTATE POWER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY; and Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Company, Defendants. KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. IOWA-ILLINOIS GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, and Bob McKiness Excavating & Grading, Inc., Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MASON CITY; and

775 F.Supp. 1227 (1991) DANELLA SOUTHWEST, INC., Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 88-0578-C-5. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. October 16, 1991. *1228 *1229 Thomas F. Jones, Clayton, Mo., John E. Price and Joseph D. Sheppard, Woolsey, Fisher,

773 F.2d 327 249 U.S.App.D.C. 64, 70 P.U.R.4th 62 MID-TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Petitioners,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,West Texas Utilities Company, Southwestern Electric PowerCompany, Edison Electric Institute, Potomac Electric PowerCompany, Dennis J. Roberts, II, Attorney General of theState of Rhode Island, et al., Intervenors.ALABAMA ELECTRIC COOPERAT