⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Southern California Edison Company v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Company”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950-08-09 · Published · cited 11× · 183 F.2d 125
POPE, Circuit Judge. This was an action brought by the appellant, Lester W. Hurley, against the appellee, Southern California Edison Company, Limited, here called the Company, to require it" to account for dividends on its ■stock, and certain stock rights, which Hurley asserts the Company paid out and delivered to the wrong person. On November 20, 1928, Hurley was a minor of the age of 20 years. He resided,
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016-09-12 · Published · cited 122× · 148 A.3d 633; 2016 Del. LEXIS 474
VALIHURA, Justice: This is a consolidated appeal in an insurance-coverage dispute from separate judgments by the Court of Chancery and the Superior Court. Viking Pump, Inc. (“Viking”) and Warren Pumps, LLC (“Warren”) seek to recover under insurance policies issued to a third company, Houdaille Industries, Inc. (“Houdaille”). In the 1980’s, Viking and Warren acquired pump manufactu
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996-09-06 · Published · cited 78× · 90 F.3d 1523
90 F.3d 1523 Daniel J. TRIERWEILER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CROXTON AND TRENCH HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delawarecorporation; Dublin Osaka Group, Inc., a Nevadacorporation; R&B Financial Group, a Texas corporation;Columbus Equities International, Inc., formerly known asParsons Securities, Inc., an Ohio corporation; MonetaryFund, Inc., a Texas corporation; Charles W. Trench;Benjamin C. Croxton, an individual; Ralp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE RUIZ, No. 24-3378 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cv-01800- WQH-KSC v. THE BRADFORD EXCHANGE, OPINION LTD., Defendant - Appellant.
California Court of Appeal · 2023-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/6/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION† IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CITY OF WHITTIER, B321450 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20NWCV00143) v. EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.
California Court of Appeal · 2023-12-26 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/26/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CITY OF WHITTIER, B321450 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20NWCV00143) v. ORDER MODIFYING
California Court of Appeal · 2021-07-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/12/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HUE THI DANG MAI, D076708 Cross-complainant and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017-00009627- v. CU-OR-CTL) HKT CAL, INC., et al.,
California Court of Appeal · 2014-11-05 · Published · cited 47× · 231 Cal. App. 4th 134; 180 Cal. Rptr. 3d 173; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1007
*144 Opinion KUSSMAN, J. * INTRODUCTION This is the latest of multiple appeals in a case in which courts have been called upon to determine the amount of rent a pipeline company must pay to a railroad
California Court of Appeal · 2020-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 10/26/20 Certified for Publication 11/17/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT LOS ANGELES UNIFIED B291940 SCHOOL DISTRICT, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC485280) v. TORRES CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al., Defe
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011-01-21 · Published · cited 190× · 632 F.3d 777; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1255; 2011 WL 183969
632 F.3d 777 (2011) FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. RNK, INC., d/b/a RNK Telecom, Defendant, Appellant, Ripple Communications, Inc., Defendant, Appellee. No. 09-2524. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard September 10, 2010. Decided January 21, 2011. *779 Andre Sansoucy, wit
California Court of Appeal · 2013-02-11 · Published · cited 151× · 213 Cal. App. 4th 872; 2013 WL 494022; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 107; 153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 546
Opinion RICHMAN, J. Plaintiff Scott Call Jolley and Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) entered into a construction loan agreement in 2006, which eventually encountered problems due to alleged failures by WaMu to properly disburse construction funds. As Jolley was continuing to attempt to salvage the transaction, WaMu went into receivership with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and in September 2008
California Court of Appeal · 2006-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 546; 145 Cal. App. 4th 289
51 Cal.Rptr.3d 546 (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 289 Eve PRINCE, Cross-Complainant and Appellant, v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Cross-Defendant and Respondent. No. H028957. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District. November 29, 2006. *547 Jon A. Heaberlin, Bernard P. Lahde, Rankin Landsness, Lahde,
Coppola v. Smithpublic domain
District Court, E.D. California · 2013-03-26 · Published · cited 14× · 935 F. Supp. 2d 993; 2013 WL 1281591; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43010
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS & MOTION TO JOIN NECESSARY PART ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge. This is an environmental law case that arises from the chemical contamination of *1004property associated with a dry cleaning business. Plaintiffs (collectively “Coppola”) have brought suit against the City of Visalia (“the City”
California Court of Appeal · 2005-05-26 · Published · cited 23× · 29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 89; 129 Cal. App. 4th 944
29 Cal.Rptr.3d 89 (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 944 ESCONDIDO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CASA SUEÑOS DE ORO, INC., Defendant and Appellant. No. D043104. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. May 26, 2005. *93 Best Best & Krieger, Bruce W. Beach, Karen Freeman Landers and Adri
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-04-04 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1072C Filed: April 4, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ST. BERNARD PARISH * GOVERNMENT, * Motion to Dismiss; Breach of * Contract; Monetary Damages; Plaintiff, * Equitable Relief; Indemnification;
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013-05-31 · Published · cited 11× · 948 F. Supp. 2d 1131; 2013 WL 2420907; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77191
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT KAISER’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 12(b)(6), DENYING DEFENDANT KAISER’S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE (12)(b)(7), AND ORDER RE RULE 19 JOINDER ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from a dispute over a health maintenance organization’s ability to take discounts on service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996-09-06 · Published · cited 232× · 90 F.3d 1523; 1996 WL 422080
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Daniel J. Trierweiler loaned Croxton and Trench Holding Corporation (“C&T”) $1.2 million. The debtor defaulted, and Trierweiler seeks to recover his investment. Following two unsuccessful lawsuits before the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Trierweiler appeals the dismissal of several of his claims for failure to comply with Colorado’s certificate of
California Supreme Court · 1994-08-18 · Published · cited 104× · 878 P.2d 566; 8 Cal. 4th 216; 32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 807; 94 Daily Journal DAR 11530; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6367; 1994 Cal. LEXIS 4269
8 Cal.4th 216 (1994) 878 P.2d 566 32 Cal. Rptr.2d 807 20th CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JOHN GARAMENDI, as Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Appellant. 20th CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents; v. JOHN GARAMENDI, as Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Appellant; VOTER REVOLT, Intervener and Appellant. HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992-11-18 · Published · cited 16× · 808 F. Supp. 1165; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19357; 1992 WL 368607
808 F.Supp. 1165 (1992) Albert LEONARDIS and Mario Zecca, Plaintiffs, v. BURNS INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 92-2374 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 18, 1992. *1166 *1167 Albert Leonardis, pro se. Sidney Altner, Edison, NJ, fo