Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Southcentral Foundation v. Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium”
Southcentral Foundation v. Anthcpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION, No. 18-35868 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-00018- TMB ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellee. AMENDED
Southcentral Foundation v. Anthcpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION, No. 18-35868 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:17-cv-00018- TMB ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court
166 F.3d 986 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 785, 1999 DailyJournal D.A.R. 961COOK INLET TREATY TRIBES; Chickaloon Native Village;Eklutna Native Village; Ninilchik Native Village;Seldovia Village Tribe; and KnikTribe, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee,andSouthcentral Foundation; and Cook Inlet Region, Inc.,Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees.
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Nagopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL No. 24-6629 FOUNDATION, INC., D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00389- Plaintiff - Appellant, LEK-WRP v. OPINION SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as the Chief Election Off
Mark McDonald v. Kristina Lawsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK MCDONALD; JEFF BARKE, No. 22-56220 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01805- v. FWS-ADS KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the OPINION Medical Board of California; RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board o
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS No. 24-3661 FOR ETHICAL CARE INC; D.C. No. ADVOCATES PROTECTING 3:23-cv-05736- CHILDREN; PARENT 1A; DGE PARENT 1B; PARENT 2A; PARENT 2B; PARENT 3A; PARENT 3B; PARENT 4A;
Creighton Meland v. Shirley Weberpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CREIGHTON MELAND, No. 20-15762 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-02288- JAM-AC SHIRLEY N. WEBER,* Secretary of State of California, in her official capacity as Secretary
Peter Stavrianoudakis v. Usfwspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER STAVRIANOUDAKIS; No. 22-16788 KATHERINE STAVRIANOUDAKIS; SCOTT D.C. No. TIMMONS; ERIC ARIYOSHI; 1:18-cv-01505- AMERICAN FALCONRY JLT-BAM CONSERVANCY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; CHARLTON H. BONHAM, in his official capacity as Directo
Cook Inlet Treaty Tribes v. Shalalapublic domain
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: The central question in this case is whether a health services compact administered by an Alaska Native Regional Corporation under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 450a-450n, requires the approval of Alaska Native villages that are neither parties to the compact nor situated within the specific area serviced under the compact. As to the parties here,
Howard Iten v. County of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOWARD ITEN, No. 22-55480 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00486- v. DDP-JEM COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the
Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Co.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER, a Nos. 20-55420 project of Orange County 20-55678 Coastkeeper; ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER, a California non- D.C. No. profit corporation, 8:18-cv-00333- Plaintiffs-Appellants/ DOC-DFM Cross-Appellees, v. OPINION CORO
Inland Empire Waterkeeper v. Corona Clay Co.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INLAND EMPIRE WATERKEEPER, a Nos. 20-55420 project of Orange County 20-55678 Coastkeeper; ORANGE COUNTY COASTKEEPER, a California non- D.C. No. profit corporation, 8:18-cv-00333- Plaintiffs-Appellants/ DOC-DFM Cross-Appellees, v. ORDER AND