⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Source 4 Inc v. Benjamin Ansehl Co”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994-11-29 · Published · cited 65× · 46 F.3d 1556
46 F.3d 1556 32 U.S.P.Q.2d 1225 CONOPCO, INC., d/b/a Chesebrough-Pond's USA Co.,Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,v.MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY and Venture Stores, Inc.,andThe Benjamin Ansehl Company,andKessler Containers, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-1412 to 92-1416. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994-09-21 · Published · cited 1× · 46 F.3d 1556
PLAGER, Circuit Judge. Defendants May Department Stores Co. (May), Venture Stores, Inc. (Venture), The Benjamin Ansehl Co. (Ansehl), and Kessler Containers Ltd. (Kessler) appeal the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, entered January 2, 1992 after a bench trial. Conopco, Inc. v. May Dep’t Stores Co., 784 F.Supp. 648, 24 USPQ2d 1721 (E.D.Mo.1992). The District Court ruled that defenda
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006-04-20 · Published · cited 38× · 235 F.R.D. 435; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22128; 2006 WL 1046957
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Judge Rubin has wryly observed that “brevity may be wit’s soul, but it is no part of patent litigation.” Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co., 301 F.Supp. 1037 (E.D.La.1969). The same may be said of intellectual property cases generally. Thus, ADC’s 3½ page motio
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2015-01-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE This Decision is a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Precedent of the TTAB P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451 General Contact Number: 571-272-8500 wbc Mailed: January 2, 2015
WSM, Inc. v. Hiltonpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982-08-27 · Published · cited 5× · 545 F. Supp. 1212; 218 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 135; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14313
545 F.Supp. 1212 (1982) WSM, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. Dennis E. HILTON, an individual, and Country Shindig Opry, Defendants. No. 82-4107-CV-C-5. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, C. D. August 27, 1982. *1213 L. Lawton Rogers, Arlington, Va., David Brydon, Jefferson City, Mo., for plaintiff. Lionel L. Lucches
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-09-11 · Published · cited 38× · 452 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64804; 2006 WL 2598212
452 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) GLOBALAW LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. CARMON & CARMON LAW OFFICE and Globalaw, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Globalaw Limited, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Jackson Walker L.L.P., and Garvey Schubert Barer, Counterclaim Defendants. No. CIV A 03-950 CKK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 11
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971-02-01 · Published · cited 16× · 463 S.W.2d 555; 1971 Mo. App. LEXIS 756
463 S.W.2d 555 (1971) Thomas Michael CUNNINGHAM, a minor, by His Next Friend, Charlotte Cunningham, Woodrow Cunningham and Charlotte Cunningham, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Kenneth L. HAYES, d/b/a Marshall Auto Salvage, Defendant-Appellant. No. 25388. Kansas City Court of Appeals, Missouri. February 1, 1971. *557 Donald S. Huff, H
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992-01-02 · Published · cited 14× · 784 F. Supp. 648; 24 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1721; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1355; 1992 WL 21810
784 F.Supp. 648 (1992) CONOPCO, INC., Plaintiff, v. MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 90-1475C(3). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. January 2, 1992. *649 *650 *651 *652