Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Sound Design Technologies Ltd v. Oticon Incorporated”
Oticon, Inc. v. Sebotek Hearing Systems, LLC.public domain
OPINION FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss by Defendant Sound Design Technologies, Ltd. (“SDT”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff Oticon Inc. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against SDT and other defendants for patent infringement. SDT argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction over SDT because it does not have the m
Cochlear Bone Anchored v. Oticon Medical Abpublic domain
Case: 19-1105 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 05/15/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ COCHLEAR BONE ANCHORED SOLUTIONS AB, Appellant v. OTICON MEDICAL AB, OTICON MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM DEMANT HOLDING A/S, Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2019-1105, 2019-1106 ______________________
RADER, Chief Judge. The United States District Court for the District of Delaware declined to order a new trial or relief from judgment after a jury found that Defendants-Appellants William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc., Oticon Inc., Oticon A/S, Bernafon AG, and Bernafon LLC (collectively “Demant”) and Widex A/S and Widex USA, Inc. (collectively “Widex”) infringed U.S. Patent No.
State v. LG Elecs., Inc.public domain
ThijfPlr.tion was fll~ m~:~1r~1 'l at ·UU t&m on~1y 'tw---t:A~ Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 91391-9 ) v.