Cases

Rosen, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur with the majority’s conclusions affirming Soto’s convictions. However, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 22-3414(3) provides: “[Wjhere there is some evidence which would reasonably justify a conviction of some lesser included crime . . . the judge shall instruct the jury as to the crime charged and any such lesser included crime.” Here, even the party offering the instruction ag

PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Johnny Soto, seeks a writ of habeas corpus because his pretrial release was revoked, even though there was no change in circumstances or additional evidence added to the record subsequent to his pretrial release. We grant the petition for the writ and quash the order of the trial court. Soto was arrested and charged with various felonies that included life felonies. The initial cha

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Soto-Robles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soto-Robles has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record r

DUBINA, Circuit Judge: Alejandro Barron-Soto (“Barron-Soto”) and Hector Hernandez (“Hernandez”) appeal their jury convictions on one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. .§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(viii), and 846; one count of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-237 LT Case No. 2022-CF-292 _____________________________ DAVIS SOTO-MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. Don H. Lester, Judge. Jennifer Cogdill, of Law Office of Jennife

*876MEMORANDUM*** Jose Soto Navarro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen proceedings to apply for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Ci

HILL, Justice. [T1] In 2014, Rocio Linch filed a W.R.C.P. 60(b)(4) motion in district court seeking to set aside a 1999 default judgment granting her husband, Ronald Linch, a divorce. The district court denied Ms. Lineh's motion on the ground that the motion was not filed within a reasonable time. Although the district court erred in denying Ms. Linch's motion solely on the basi

228 F.Supp.2d 566 (2002) Julio SOTO-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Christine G. Davis, and Michael A. Zenk, Warden, Respondents. Civil No. 1:CV-01-1555. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 29, 2002. *567 Julio Soto-Ramirez, White Deer, PA, pro se, for Petitioner. Bruce Brandler, U.S. Attorne

MEMORANDUM ** Aurelio Soto-Nevarez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 97-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Soto-Nevarez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdr

285 S.W.3d 542 (2009) TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellant, v. Jose Luis SOTO, Appellee. No. 13-08-00520-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. March 26, 2009. *543 J. Frank Davis, Courtney Moore, Texas Department of Public Safety, Austin, for appellant. Eduardo Lucio, Law Office of Eddie Lucio, Br

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DELFINA SOTO-SOTO, No. 20-70587 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A209-406-355 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Revie

[Cite as Jones v. Soto, 2023-Ohio-3107.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) MALCOLM JONES, et al. C.A. No. 22CA011870 Appellees v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE EDWIN SOTO, et al.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. PD-1119-20, PD-1120-20, & PD-1121-20 THE STATE OF TEXAS v. RAYMOND SOTO, Appellee DISSENT TO REFUSAL TO GRANT STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

2022 IL App (1st) 192484 Nos. 1-19-2484, 1-20-0722, and 1-20-1175 (cons.) Third Division June 29, 2022. ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE

APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. ALEXANDER SOTO Docket: 23-P-1111 Dates: June 6, 2024 – October 10, 2024 Present: Blake, N

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-19-00427-CR, 04-19-00428-CR & 04-19-00429-CR The STATE of Texas, Appellant v. Raymond Corey SOTO,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ELISEO SOTO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1764 January 19, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robin F. Fuson, Judge. Wade M. Whidden

PD-1356-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/20/2015 9:45:15 AM Accepted 10/20/2015 4:54:10 PM

OPINION OF THE COURT Balio, J. New York’s Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101 [1]) provides that "[a]ny person who shall be injured in person, property, means of support, or otherwise by any intoxicated person, or by reason of the intoxication of any person * * * shall have a right of action” for a violation of the statute. On this appeal we are called upon to decide, apparently as an issue of

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr