Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

(2008) Edith M. SOSA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. CIV. No. 05-2241 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 16, 2008. ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judges's Report and Recommendation affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Secu

654 F.3d 1012 (2011) Mark JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary H. SOSA, ADX Florence Acting Inmate Systems Manager; Robert A. Hood, ADX Florence Warden; (First Name Unknown) Tucker, FCI Englewood Inmates Systems Officer; Angela Shenk, FCI Englewood Inmate Systems Manager; J.L. Norwood, USP Victorville Warden, in their individual and official capacities; W.A. Sherrod, FCI Englewood Warden, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

(2008) Raul SOSA, Plaintiff, v. Peter HAMES, et al., Defendants. No. 05-23079-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. October 7, 2008. ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants, Miami-Dade County (the "County"), Peter Hames ("Hames

331 F.3d 604 Humberto ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America; Hector Berellez; Bill Waters; Pete Gruden; Jack Lawn; Antonio Garate-Bustamante; Francisco Sosa, and five unnamed Mexican nationals currently in the federal witness protection program, Defendants-Appellees.Humberto Alvarez-Machain, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Francisco Sosa, and five unnamed Mexican nationals currently in the federal witness protecti

544 P.2d 1161 (1975) 88 N.M. 596 ALBUQUERQUE-PHOENIX EXPRESS, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION of New Mexico, Respondent-Appellee, and Robert R. Burgess et al., Claimants-Appellees. No. 10247. Supreme Court of New Mexico. December 24, 1975. Rehearing Denied January 15, 1976.

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed May 8, 2013, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I have jurisdiction to review th

ORDER AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER Blackburn, District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],2 filed February 8, 2013, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I have jur

OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Carmen Hidalgo-Rosa (Hidalgo) brought this action under § 205(g) of the *242Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. Docket # 1. She then filed a memor

BENDIX, J. *265The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (the Department) rescinded appellant Thomas L. Conger's probationary promotion to lieutenant based on investigatory findings that Conger had failed to report a use of force several months before the Department promoted him to the probationary position. After unsuccessfully pursuing admi

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Filed 6/14/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THOMAS L. CONGER, B288575 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS165737) v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________ ) DAVID S. BRAUN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civ. Action No. 16-2079 (EGS) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ) and OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND ) BUDGET, )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 437PA18 Filed 5 June 2020 CARLOS CHAVEZ and LUIS LOPEZ, Petitioners, v. GARY McFADDEN, SHERIFF, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, Respondent. On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 262 N.C. App. 196, 822 S.E.2d 121 (2018), vacating and remanding orders entered on 13 October 2017 by Judge Yv

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 437PA18 Filed 5 June 2020 CARLOS CHAVEZ and LUIS LOPEZ, Petitioners, v. GARY McFADDEN, SHERIFF, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, Respondent. On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 262 N.C. App. 196, 822 S.E.2d 121 (2018), vacating and remanding orders entered on 13 October 2017 by Judge Yv

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ION LAPADAT; GIOVANI No. 23-1745 BECALI LAPADAT; LAURA Agency Nos. LAPADAT; MIRABELA A208-585-239 LAPADAT; SIMONA LAPADAT, A209-171-053 A208-585-240 P

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ION LAPADAT; GIOVANI No. 23-1745 BECALI LAPADAT; LAURA Agency Nos. LAPADAT; MIRABELA A208-585-239 LAPADAT; SIMONA LAPADAT, A209-171-053 A208-585-240 P

FILED PUBLISH United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 9, 2021 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellants, several residents of Las Gladiolas I and II public housing project (Las Gladiolas), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of several officers of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration (PRPHA) and the dismissal of their claims against the Department of Housing and Urb

Cite as 26 I&N Dec. 227 (BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3795 Matter of M-E-V-G-, Respondent Decided February 7, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to clarify that the “social visibility” element required to establish a cognizable “parti