Cases

11th Court of Appeals Eastland, Texas Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. Plaintiffs Yong Ki Hong and Hwan Media, Inc. commenced this action against defendants KBS America, Inc. (“KBSA”), Chang Joon Lee (“C.tJ. Lee”), Joseph Kong, Spring Video & Gift, Inc. (“Spring Video”), and Yang Joong Kim, d/b/a Han Kook Video, alleging federal antitrust violations under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2.

MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The parties entered into a construction subcontract that contained a broad dispute resolution provision. When disputes arose, the parties engaged in mediation as their subcontract required, reaching a settlement agreement by which they each "absolutely release[d] the other of and from any and all claims, demands and obligations of any kind arising from [the subcontr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ASPEN, Chief Judge: Defendants Edwin Chang and Michelle Chang move to vacate the default judgment entered against them on February 17, 1995, as well as the turn-over order entered by Magistrate Judge Rosemond on June 20, 1995. For the reasons set forth below, we grant defendants’ motion in part with regard to Michelle Chang, but deny the motion with regard to Edwin

OPINION OF THE COURT Edward H. Lehner, J. The novel legal issue presented on this motion by defendant 288 Kiseki Realty, Inc. (Kiseki) to dismiss the complaint is whether a power of attorney given by the sole shareholder, *360director and officer of Kiseki to his mother grants her authority, under the provision of General Obligations Law § 5-1502E,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs1 want sanctions imposed on defendants2 for the alleged spoliation of evidence following the inception in June 2008 of an investigation by the Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) into allegations of price-fi

912 F.Supp. 372 (1995) GUESS?, INC., Plaintiff, v. Edwin CHANG a/k/a Hoon Chang and Kwang Mo Choe; Michelle Chang a/k/a Michelle C. Baek and In S. Paek; Jae Hwan Kim; and Unique Fashions, Defendants. No. 94 C 3685. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 27, 1995. *373

711 F.Supp.2d 576 (2010) Zhou Jie PLANT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MERRIFIELD TOWN CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Defendants. No. 1:08cv374. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. March 18, 2010. *581 Henry St. John Fitzgerald, Law Offices of Henry St. J. Fitzgerald, Arlington, VA, for Plaintiffs, Hae

659 F.Supp.2d 31 (2009) In re ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TERRORISM LITIGATION. Civil Action Nos. 01-CV-2094, 01-CV-2684, 02-CV-1811, 03-CV-1486, 03-CV-1708, 03-CV-1959, 05-CV-2124, 06-CV-473, 06-CV-516, 06-CV-596, 06-CV-690, 06-CV-750, 06-CV-1116, 07-CV-1302, 08-CV-520, 08-CV-531, 08-CV-1273, 08-CV-1615, 08 CV-1807, 08-CV-1814. United States District Court, District of Columbia. Septembe

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Chong Won Tai (Tai) was convicted of two counts of extortion in 1991. This is the second appeal from the sentencing imposed pursuant to that verdict. On this appeal, Tai challenges the reasons given for the district court’s sentence. First, he urges that the district court erroneously found his activities “otherwise extensive.” Second, he claims an upwar

789 P.2d 501 (1990) KUKUI NUTS OF HAWAII, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. BAIRD & CO., INC.; Design Creations, Inc.; Liven & Co. (Hawaii); Arakawas of Waipahu, Ltd.; N. Kamuri, Ltd., d/b/a Ritz Department Stores; and Pomare, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees, and Blair Ltd.; Allan Ching a/k/a Allen Ching; MNS, Ltd. d/b/a ABC Stores; Waltah Clarke Hawaiian Shops, Inc.; WDC Venture, a Hawaii General Partnership, d/b/a International Market Pla

695 F.Supp. 100 (1988) WARNER BROS. INC., Plaintiff, v. DAE RIM TRADING, INC., and Yun Yon Cho, Defendants. No. 84 Civ. 4675 (IBW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 21, 1988. *101 Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, New York City, for plaintiff; J. Joseph Bainton, of counsel. Curtis, Morris &

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

Interim Decision #2614 MATTER OF 0, et al. In Exclusion Proceedings A-22432000, et al. Decided by Board May 12, 1977, and September 14, 1977 (1) This proceeding involves 126 aliens who were applicants for admission to the United States. They were brought to Guam on United States military aircraft as part of the evacuation of Vietnam. While they were not natives of Vietnam, they had Vi

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

726 P.2d 268 (1986) KUKUI NUTS OF HAWAII, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. BAIRD & CO., INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees, and John Does 13-20; Jane Does 19-20; Doe Corporations 4-30; Doe Nonprofit Corporations 1-20; Doe Partnerships 1-20; and Doe Unincorporated Associations 1-20, Defendants, and BLAIR, LTD., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alie A. HUSSEIN dba Ali Baba Imports, and dba Ali Baba Import, and db