Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Sonder Technology Inc.”
Opinion issued December 15, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00378-CV ——————————— JETALL COMPANIES, INC., 1001 WL LLC, GALLERIA LOOP NOTE HOLDER LLC, GALLERIA 2425 OWNER LLC, BDFI LLC, ALI CHOUDHRI, BRAD PARKER, AND AZEEMAH ZAHEER,
Juback v. Michaels Stores, Inc.public domain
ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt. 62) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts III, VII, and VIII (Dkt. 63). Each party responded in opposition to the other’s motion (Dkts. 87, 88). Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. Defendant’s
Opinion issued February 22, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00515-CV ——————————— MARK SHEPARD, BROCK SHEPARD, CHRISTOPHER NEWHOUSE, WESTLEY HINTON, SKYDANCING CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATES, INC., AND STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATES, INC.,
ROTHENBERG, J. The plaintiff below, Bone & Joint Treatment Centers of America (“BJA”), appeals from the final judgment entered in its favor against defendant HealthTronics Surgical Services, Inc. (“HealthTronics”), and from the final judgment entered in favor of defendants HT Orthotripsy Management Company, LLC (“HTO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HealthTronics, and SanuWave, Inc. (“SanuWave”). Health-Tronics cro
Rams v. Def Jam Recordings, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Louise Rams and Alexander Flemming filed this action on April 13, 2015 in the Central District of California against Defendants Def Jam Recordings, Inc. (“Def Jam”), Universal Music Group Recordings, Inc. (“UMG”), Jeremih Fel-ton, Mick Schultz Productions, and Does 1-10 Inclusive (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintif
MEMORANDUM DECISION TIMOTHY A. BARNES, Bankruptcy Judge. The matter before the court is the Motion To Dismiss the Second Amended Adversary Complaint To Avoid and Recover Avoidable Transfers and Disallow Claims (the “Motion To Dismiss ”) [Docket No. 51] of Wisenbaker Builder Services Ltd. and Wisenbaker Builder Services, Inc. (collectively “Wisenbaker ” or “Defendants ”).
Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.public domain
(2008) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., Roche Diagnostics GmbH, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 2, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. Amgen Inc. ("Amgen") sought declaratory relief to prevent F.
Strata Solar, LLC v. Naftelpublic domain
Strata Solar, LLC v. Naftel, 2020 NCBC 79. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION DURHAM COUNTY 20 CVS 2893 STRATA SOLAR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON ALBERT JACKSON NAFTEL, IV; DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO JOHN BLAIR SCHOOFF; BRIAN
Sonders v. Mezvinsky (In Re Mezvinsky)public domain
265 B.R. 681 (2001) In re Marjorie Margolies MEZVINSKY, Debtor. David G. Sonders, Plaintiff, v. Marjorie Margolies Mezvinsky, Defendant. First Union National Bank, Plaintiff, v. Marjorie Margolies Mezvinsky, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-11767DWS. Adversary Nos. 00-0462, 00-0463. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 1, 2001.
Agai v. Mihalatos (In re Mihalatos)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Hon. Robert E. Grossman, U.S.B.J. Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by the Plaintiffs, Jacob Agai, 291 Avenue P, LLC and Summer-field Developers, Inc. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs” or “Agai”), seeking judgment as a matter of law that the Debtor, Dennis Mihalatos (“Debtor” or “Mihalatos”), should be denied his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(3), (a)(4)(A) and (a
ARW Exploration Corp. v. Aguirrepublic domain
BURCIAGA, Senior District Judge. Defendants-Appellants ARW Exploration Corporation (“ARW”) and Spyridon Armenis (“Armenis”) appeal the district court’s submission of the parties’ disputes to binding arbitration and the district court’s subsequent confirmation of the ensuing arbitration award. Plaintiffs-Appellees are twenty individual investors who purchased interests in one or more of six related oil a
Larson v. Bayer (In re Bayer)public domain
OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, CHIEF U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION In this adversary proceeding, Plaintiffs John Larson (“Larson”) and Greg Bayer (“G. Bayer”) (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) requested a determination that their pre-petition claims against the Debtor, Nich*204olas Bayer (“N. Bayer”), are excepted from discharge
Opinion issued April 30, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00109-CV ——————————— FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL, LLP, TIMOTHY SPEAR, JAMES G. MUNISTERI, AND SHA
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00095-CV ___________________________ DEBBIE PERALES, ROBIN HAWKINS, SUZANNE LEOS, CRYSTAL CHAVEZ, JILL HIATT, URSULA CUI, SHAWNA GOFFNEY, AMBER MCMILLAN, LARAMIE RIVERA, AND LUIS TROCHEZ, Appellants V.
Gieseking v. Thomaspublic domain
358 B.R. 754 (2007) Christopher GIESEKING, Plaintiff, v. Michael THOMAS, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 04-60786. Adversary No. 05-6000. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois. January 5, 2007. *755 *756 *757 Bonnie L. Clair, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiff.
45 F.3d 1455 ARW EXPLORATION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Cesar V. AGUIRRE; Anastasios Andriopoulos; Charles E.Bender; B.W. Covington; Chris Dalamangas; P. Elaportas;George Ioannides; Kyriakos Ioannides; V. Kaltsas;Christos P. Kartsonis; Demetrious Kartsonis; A. GeorgeMagouliotis; A. Papathanasopolous; Steve Poulos; S.L.Prabhu; Neal Roth; Dorothy Roychoudhury; S.L. Stogiannis;G. Vallianos; and I
Gray v. Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Co.public domain
HATCHETT, Chief Judge: Appellant, Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company (Lockheed), appeals from a district court order in favor of the appellees, Stacy Gray, Grace Schumacher and Wilma Jennings. The appellees, survivors of three naval aircraft crewmembers who were killed after ejecting from a crashing Lockheed-manufactured aircraft, filed actions against Lockheed for wrongful
In Re Reecepublic domain
Justice WILLETT, joined by Justice JOHNSON as to Part IV, dissenting. Intrepidity at the Alamo; entering the United States as the Republic of Texas; fifty-eight Texas-born recipients of the Medal of Honor; Bob Wills and George Strait; Nolan Ryan and Babe Didrikson Zaharias; five Super Bowl titles (sadly none this millennium); Dr Pepper and the “little creamery” in Brenham; deep-fried anything at the State Fair;
in Re Coy Reecepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 09-0520 ════════════ In re Coy Reece, Relator
Brauner v. United Statespublic domain
Lawrence, Judge: This appeal for a reappraisement was filed pursuant to the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1501). The merchandise under consideration consists of parts of a so-called Lurgi acid distillation plant which was imported by E. F. Drew & Co., Inc., of New York, in a knockeddown condition. Brauner & Co. acted as customhouse broker.