Cases

*480TAMILIA, Judge: These cases were consolidated for appeal and certified to the Court en banc for review of a single issue, that being whether a property settlement agreement providing for the payment of support and incorporated into a divorce decree merged with the decree thereby becoming modifiable by the courts upon a showing of a material change in circumstances.<

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION BILL PARKER, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court for trial of the Complaint of the Plaintiff, First United Bank and Trust Co. (the “Plaintiff’), through which it seeks to deny the entry of a Chapter 7 discharge in favor of the joint Debtor-Defendant, Sherry R. Buescher (“Debtor”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2), § 727(a)(3) or § 727(a)(5) or, alternatively, s

ROTHENBERG, J. Knowlan Dawson (“Dawson”) appeals the trial court’s denial of his emergency objection to foreclosure sale, motion to vacate the October 21, 2009 foreclosure sale, and motion to strike final judgment of foreclosure. Because we find no abuse of discretion, we affirm.1 Dawson, who defaulted on a mortgage secured by commercial property, sought relief from an order aff

279 B.R. 328 (2002) In re Thomas W. LEFFINGWELL et ux., Debtors. The Cadle Company, Plaintiff, v. Thomas W. Leffingwell et ux., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 00-3299-8C7. Adversary No. 00-00467. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. May 14, 2002. *329 *330

Strata Solar, LLC v. Naftel, 2020 NCBC 79. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION DURHAM COUNTY 20 CVS 2893 STRATA SOLAR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON ALBERT JACKSON NAFTEL, IV; DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO JOHN BLAIR SCHOOFF; BRIAN

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00077-CV ___________________________ RICHARD W. MONCRIEF AND MARSHALL M. SEARCY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR RESPECTIVE CAPACITIES AS SUCCESSOR GENERAL PARTNERS OF MONCRIEF FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND TRUSTEES OF THE W.A. MONCRIEF, JR

Opinion issued February 22, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00515-CV ——————————— MARK SHEPARD, BROCK SHEPARD, CHRISTOPHER NEWHOUSE, WESTLEY HINTON, SKYDANCING CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATES, INC., AND STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATES, INC.,

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00077-CV ___________________________ RICHARD W. MONCRIEF AND MARSHALL M. SEARCY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR RESPECTIVE CAPACITIES AS SUCCESSOR GENERAL PARTNERS OF MONCRIEF FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L.P. AND TRUSTEES OF THE W.A. MONCRIEF, JR

ROTHENBERG, J. The plaintiff below, Bone & Joint Treatment Centers of America (“BJA”), appeals from the final judgment entered in its favor against defendant HealthTronics Surgical Services, Inc. (“HealthTronics”), and from the final judgment entered in favor of defendants HT Orthotripsy Management Company, LLC (“HTO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of HealthTronics, and SanuWave, Inc. (“SanuWave”). Health-Tronics cro

Opinion issued August 28, 2025. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00651-CV ——————————— HUMPHRIES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant V. HIGHLAND VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HIGHLAND VILLAGE GP LLC, HIGHLA

PER CURIAM. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Defendant Mustang Partners (Mustang) appeals the district court’s order of July 27, 1990, in favor of the plaint

996 F.Supp. 1334 (1998) Gene MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Defendant. No. CIV-96-609-R. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. January 6, 1998. *1335 Emmanuel E. Edem, Nicole M. Vernier-Gelven, Norman, Edem, McNaughton & Wallace, Larry D. Muse, Larry D. Muse & Assoc.,

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. One of the many contested matters in Kmart’s bankruptcy was whether the debt- or could assume an executory contract with Capital One Bank providing for a co-branded credit card. Kmart wanted to continue the arrangement, while Capital One did not want its brand to be associated with a bankrupt retailer. After a trial, Bankruptcy Judge Sonderby held tha

946 F.2d 103 RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as Conservatorfor Savers Savings Association, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MUSTANG PARTNERS, a Missouri Limited Partnership, Defendant-Appellant,v.RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, in its capacity as Receiverfor Savers Federal Savings and Loan Association,Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-6276. United States Court of Ap

MEMORANDUM DECISION Hon. Robert E. Grossman, U.S.B.J. Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by the Plaintiffs, Jacob Agai, 291 Avenue P, LLC and Summer-field Developers, Inc. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs” or “Agai”), seeking judgment as a matter of law that the Debtor, Dennis Mihalatos (“Debtor” or “Mihalatos”), should be denied his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(3), (a)(4)(A) and (a

Opinion issued April 30, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00109-CV ——————————— FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL, LLP, TIMOTHY SPEAR, JAMES G. MUNISTERI, AND SHA

796 A.2d 400 (2002) Solomon SIMMONS, Appellant, v. DELAWARE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, Derwin C. Clark and C & Y Contractors, Inc. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 12, 2002. Decided April 10, 2002. *401 Joseph J. McIntosh, Media, for appellant. Adrian R. Reid, Philadelphia, for appellees. Before SM

At the close of all the evidence in the trial of this cause, the court gave the instruction offered by defendant that under the pleadings and the evidence plaintiffs could not recover; whereupon plaintiffs took an involuntary nonsuit, and the case is here upon their appeal from the order overruling the motion to set aside the nonsuit. The plaintiffs were building contractors, and their petition was founded upon two policies issued on May 5, 1916, by the defendant company. The policy de

MEMORANDUM OPINION JEAN K. FITZSIMON, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) in this adversary proceeding are former home health care aides who worked for Lee’s Industries, Inc. (“Lee’s Industries”), which the debtor, Nina Marie Kinard (“Debtor”) and her brother, Eric Lamback (“Eric”), co-owned. As will be explained in more detail below, Plaintiffs f

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00095-CV ___________________________ DEBBIE PERALES, ROBIN HAWKINS, SUZANNE LEOS, CRYSTAL CHAVEZ, JILL HIATT, URSULA CUI, SHAWNA GOFFNEY, AMBER MCMILLAN, LARAMIE RIVERA, AND LUIS TROCHEZ, Appellants V.