Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Solomon v. At&t Technologies In”
State v. Solomonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-748 Filed 18 June 2025 Wake County, Nos. 19CRS216598-910, 19CRS216599-910 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TYSHON GEROD SOLOMON Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 2 June 2023 by Judge Keith O. Gregory in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 25 February 2025. Attorney General Jeff Jackson, by Special
524 F.3d 1310 (2008) SOLOMON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc., and Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc., Intervenors. No. 2007-1391. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 7, 2008.
Solomon v. Dechert LLPpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3137 (JEB) DECHERT LLP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jonathan “Jay” Solomon, former chief foreign-affairs correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, was no stranger to having his name appear in the
Detrina Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc.public domain
23‐7597‐cv Detrina Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: May 1, 2025) Docket No. 23‐7597‐cv DETRINA SOLOMON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2018-0816-JTL CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) OPINION ON FEE AWARD AND INCENTIVE AWARD Date Submitted: April 19, 2023 Date Decided: July 31, 2023 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Brendan W. Sullivan, Casimir O. Szustak, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Dominic Minerva, Joseph Cotilletta, Nathaniel Blakney, LA
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) 2018-0816-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 13, 2020 Date Decided: June 11, 2020 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, Mark Richardson, Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, Dominic Pod
SIG, Inc. v. AT & T Digital Life, Inc.public domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [D.E. 28] filed by AT & T Digital Life, Inc., and AT & T Teleholdings, Inc., (collectively “AT & T Defendants”) and the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [D.E. 35] filed by Robert Diamond, William Diamond, and James Diamond (
Linda Solomon v. Thomas Vilsackpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. MILLETT, Circuit Judge: Invoking the protections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., Linda Solomon sought substantial flexibility in her working hours — what is known as a “maxiflex” schedule — as an accommodation for her disability. She alleges that she infor
Beach TV Props., Inc. v. Solomonpublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION With the inclusion of a few check marks on a form submitted in 1999, this litigation might have been avoided. In December of 1999, Defendant Henry Solomon, an attorney for Plaintiff Atlanta Channel, Inc. ("ACI"), submitted a form on ACI's behalf to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") without realizing that several key questio
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL STOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0109-LM ) SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) )
Busch & LaBate v. Westell Technologies, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN H. BUSCH and LINDSEY ) LABATE, individually and on behalf of ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0346-NAC ) WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THE ) VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED ) FEBRUARY 23, 1994, AMONG MR. ) PENNY, MR. SIM
In Re Exide Technologiespublic domain
303 B.R. 48 (2003) In re EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, et al.[1], Debtors. No. 02-11125 (KJC). United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 30, 2003. *49 *50 *51 *52 Christopher James Lhulier, James E. O'Neill, Kathleen
KT4 Partners LLC v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.public domain
STRINE, Chief Justice: *741 This appeal arises from a less-than-summary books and records action brought under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The stockholder and plaintiff below, KT4 Partners LLC, appeals from the Court of Chancery's post-trial order granting in part an
In Re Micro-Precision Technologies, Inc.public domain
303 B.R. 238 (2003) In re MICRO-PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Debtor. No. 02-10200-MWV. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. November 25, 2003. *239 *240 Jennifer Rood, Esq., Backus, Meyer, Solomon & Rood, Manchester, NH, for Debtor. John Silbermann, Esq., Deborah S. Barrett-Smit
Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.public domain
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc. (“Bloodhound” or the “Company”) created web-*628based software applications that allowed healthcare providers to monitor claims for fraud. The plaintiffs are five software developers, including Bloodhound’s founder, who contend that their years of hard work laid the foundatio
Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.public domain
TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Ancora Technologies, Inc., owns U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941, which claims methods for verifying that a software program on a computer is not there without authorization, but is licensed to be there. In December 2010, Ancora sued Apple Inc., alleging that products running Apple’s iOS operating system infringed the '941 patent. The United States District Court
Solomon v. Armstrongpublic domain
747 A.2d 1098 (1999) Stephen A. SOLOMON, TRV Holding Co., Melvin Ward, Caran E. Weinstein, Andrea Goldfarb, Trustees for the Eisenberg Children's Irrevocable Trust II, Plaintiffs, v. Anne L. ARMSTRONG, John H. Bryan, Wallace W. Creek, Thomas E. Everhart, Charles T. Fisher, III, William E. Hoglund, James P. Humphrey, J. Michael Losh, L. Willard Marriott, Jr., Ann D. McLaughlin, Paul H. O'Neill, Harry J. Pearce, Edmund T. Pratt, Jr., John G. Smale,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEOKOH, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0613-JRS ) LARD-PT, LLC, ) ) Respondent, ) )
348 B.R. 234 (2005) In re WINSTAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al., Debtors. Christine C. Shubert, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Lucent Technologies Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-1430 (JBR), Adversary No. 01-1063 (JBR). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 21, 2005. *235 *236<
Baran v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.public domain
666 F.Supp.2d 776 (2009) Gregory W. BARAN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:04cv1251. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 30, 2009. *778 Steven M. Auvil, Bryan J. Jaketic, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff.