⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Solomon v. At&t Technologies In”

State v. Solomonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-748 Filed 18 June 2025 Wake County, Nos. 19CRS216598-910, 19CRS216599-910 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. TYSHON GEROD SOLOMON Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 2 June 2023 by Judge Keith O. Gregory in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 25 February 2025. Attorney General Jeff Jackson, by Special
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-05-07 · Published · cited 17× · 524 F.3d 1310; 86 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1805; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9723; 2008 WL 1959515
524 F.3d 1310 (2008) SOLOMON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc., and Toyota Motor Manufacturing Kentucky, Inc., Intervenors. No. 2007-1391. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 7, 2008.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN SOLOMON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-3137 (JEB) DECHERT LLP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jonathan “Jay” Solomon, former chief foreign-affairs correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, was no stranger to having his name appear in the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025-05-01 · Published · cited 27× · 136 F.4th 41
23‐7597‐cv Detrina Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: May 1, 2025) Docket No. 23‐7597‐cv DETRINA SOLOMON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. 2018-0816-JTL CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) OPINION ON FEE AWARD AND INCENTIVE AWARD Date Submitted: April 19, 2023 Date Decided: July 31, 2023 Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Brendan W. Sullivan, Casimir O. Szustak, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Dominic Minerva, Joseph Cotilletta, Nathaniel Blakney, LA
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-06-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ) Consol. C.A. No. CLASS V STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) 2018-0816-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: March 13, 2020 Date Decided: June 11, 2020 Ned Weinberger, Derrick Farrell, Mark Richardson, Thomas Curry, LABATON SUCHAROW LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, Dominic Pod
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013-09-12 · Published · cited 17× · 971 F. Supp. 2d 1178; 2013 WL 5005730; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130538
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [D.E. 28] filed by AT & T Digital Life, Inc., and AT & T Teleholdings, Inc., (collectively “AT & T Defendants”) and the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [D.E. 35] filed by Robert Diamond, William Diamond, and James Diamond (
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014-08-15 · Published · cited 290× · 412 U.S. App. D.C. 127; 763 F.3d 1; 30 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 649; 2014 WL 4065613; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15671
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. MILLETT, Circuit Judge: Invoking the protections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., Linda Solomon sought substantial flexibility in her working hours — what is known as a “maxiflex” schedule — as an accommodation for her disability. She alleges that she infor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 306 F. Supp. 3d 70
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION With the inclusion of a few check marks on a form submitted in 1999, this litigation might have been avoided. In December of 1999, Defendant Henry Solomon, an attorney for Plaintiff Atlanta Channel, Inc. ("ACI"), submitted a form on ACI's behalf to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") without realizing that several key questio
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL STOCK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0109-LM ) SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) )
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-03-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STEVEN H. BUSCH and LINDSEY ) LABATE, individually and on behalf of ) others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0346-NAC ) WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THE ) VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED ) FEBRUARY 23, 1994, AMONG MR. ) PENNY, MR. SIM
District Court, D. Delaware · 2003-12-30 · Published · cited 46× · 303 B.R. 48; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1768; 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 108; 2003 WL 23096874
303 B.R. 48 (2003) In re EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, et al.[1], Debtors. No. 02-11125 (KJC). United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 30, 2003. *49 *50 *51 *52 Christopher James Lhulier, James E. O'Neill, Kathleen
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2019-01-29 · Published · cited 49× · 203 A.3d 738
STRINE, Chief Justice: *741 This appeal arises from a less-than-summary books and records action brought under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The stockholder and plaintiff below, KT4 Partners LLC, appeals from the Court of Chancery's post-trial order granting in part an
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 9× · 303 B.R. 238; 51 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 560; 2003 BNH 38; 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1707; 42 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 82; 2003 WL 23002550
303 B.R. 238 (2003) In re MICRO-PRECISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Debtor. No. 02-10200-MWV. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. November 25, 2003. *239 *240 Jennifer Rood, Esq., Backus, Meyer, Solomon & Rood, Manchester, NH, for Debtor. John Silbermann, Esq., Deborah S. Barrett-Smit
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013-03-15 · Published · cited 93× · 65 A.3d 618; 2013 Del. Ch. LEXIS 69; 2013 WL 1104901
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc. (“Bloodhound” or the “Company”) created web-*628based software applications that allowed healthcare providers to monitor claims for fraud. The plaintiffs are five software developers, including Bloodhound’s founder, who contend that their years of hard work laid the foundatio
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-03-03 · Published · cited 28× · 744 F.3d 732; 109 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2135; 2014 WL 803104; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3895
TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Ancora Technologies, Inc., owns U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941, which claims methods for verifying that a software program on a computer is not there without authorization, but is licensed to be there. In December 2010, Ancora sued Apple Inc., alleging that products running Apple’s iOS operating system infringed the '941 patent. The United States District Court
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1999-03-25 · Published · cited 111× · 747 A.2d 1098; 1999 Del. Ch. LEXIS 62; 1999 WL 182569
747 A.2d 1098 (1999) Stephen A. SOLOMON, TRV Holding Co., Melvin Ward, Caran E. Weinstein, Andrea Goldfarb, Trustees for the Eisenberg Children's Irrevocable Trust II, Plaintiffs, v. Anne L. ARMSTRONG, John H. Bryan, Wallace W. Creek, Thomas E. Everhart, Charles T. Fisher, III, William E. Hoglund, James P. Humphrey, J. Michael Losh, L. Willard Marriott, Jr., Ann D. McLaughlin, Paul H. O'Neill, Harry J. Pearce, Edmund T. Pratt, Jr., John G. Smale,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2021-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEOKOH, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0613-JRS ) LARD-PT, LLC, ) ) Respondent, ) )
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2005-12-21 · Published · cited 20× · 348 B.R. 234; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2683; 2005 WL 4705075
348 B.R. 234 (2005) In re WINSTAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al., Debtors. Christine C. Shubert, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Lucent Technologies Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-1430 (JBR), Adversary No. 01-1063 (JBR). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 21, 2005. *235 *236<
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009-09-30 · Published · cited 2× · 666 F. Supp. 2d 776; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91731; 2009 WL 3193278
666 F.Supp.2d 776 (2009) Gregory W. BARAN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL DEVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:04cv1251. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 30, 2009. *778 Steven M. Auvil, Bryan J. Jaketic, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff.