Cases

15-3135(L) Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________ August Term, 2015 Case Argued: April 12, 2016 Case Decided: August 31, 2016 Motion Filed: October 8, 2018 Motion Decided: June 3, 2

*322 JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: In this case, eleven American families sued the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”) and the Palestinian Authority (“PA”) (collectively, “defendants”) 1 und

ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge: Plaintiffs brought this case pursuant to the Antiterrorism Act of 1992, 18 U.S.C. § 2331 et seq. (“ATA”), as well as several non-federal causes of action. Defendants, the Palestine Liberation Organization (“PLO”) and the Palestinian Authority (“PA”), move for summary judgment in their favor to dismiss all of the counts -in the First Amended Comp

(2008) Mark I. SOKOLOW, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE PALESTINE LIBERATION ORGANIZATION, the Palestinian Authority (a/k/a "The Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority" and/or "The Palestinian Council" and/or "The Palestinian National Authority"), and John Does 1-99, Defendants. No. 04 CV 397(DBD). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 30, 2008. <

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Motion of Senator Charles Grassley, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 11

The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Per Curiam: *573In this case, eleven American families sued the defendants, the Palestine Liberation Organization ("PLO") and the Palestinian Authority ("PA"), under the Anti-Terrorism Act ("ATA"), 18 U.S.C. § 2333(a), for va

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–45 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are r

22-76-cv (L) Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________ August Term 2022 Argued: May 3, 2023 Decided: September 8, 2023 Docket Nos. 22-76-cv (L), 22-496-cv (Con) ______

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

15-3135-cv (L) Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Organization UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________ August Term 2022 Argued: May 3, 2023 Decided: September 8, 2023 Docket Nos. 15-3135-cv (L), 15-3151-cv (XAP), 22-1060-cv (Con) ____________________________________ EVA WAL

15-3135-cv (L) Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Org. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________ August Term 2025 Motion Filed: August 11, 2025 Motion Decided: March 30, 2026 Docket Nos. 15-3135-cv (L), 15-3151-cv (XAP), 22-1060-cv (Con) _________________________________

OPINION AND ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: This is a civil action to recover damages for the murder of two United States citizens, Saado Ali Warsame and Abdullahi Ali Anshoor. Warsame and Anshoor were killed in Mogadishu, Somalia in 2014. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) alleges that they were murdered by the terrorist organization Harakat al-Shabaab al-Muja-hideen or “al-Shabaab.”

20-3849-cv Spetner v. PIB In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM 2021 ARGUED: FEBRUARY 25, 2022 DECIDED: JUNE 16, 2023 No. 20-3849-cv Temima Spetner, Jason Kirschenbaum, Isabelle Kirschenbaum, individually and for the Estate of Martin Kirschenbaum, Joshua Kirsc

Brian M. Cogan, U.S.D.J. These cases involve claims brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act (the "ATA") against Arab Bank, PLC ("Arab Bank"), which has moved to dismiss the complaints in both actions. For the reasons stated below, the [30] motion to dismiss in the action docketed under docket number 18-cv-2192 is granted in part and denied in part, and the [12] motion to dismiss in the action docketed under docket number 18-cv-4670 i

*678 OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Bank of China, Ltd. (“BOC”) has served the New York branch of Bank Hapoalim B.M., a non-party, with a deposition subpoena. The subpoena invokes Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to seek testimony from Bank Hapoalim about topics that Bank Hapoal

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are family members and the estate of Eish Kodesh Gilmore, a United States national killed in a shooting on October 30, 2000, in Jerusalem, Israel (“Plaintiffs”). They bring this case against Defendants, the Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority (“PA”) and the Palest

DECISION & ORDER RICHARD M. BERMAN, District Judge. Introduction The Court has received another application, dated December 25, 2013, from Defendants U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) (collectively, “Government” or “Defendants”) relating to the Court’s Decision and Order, dated September 9, 2013 973 F.Supp.2d 306, 2

Griffith, Circuit Judge: In 1998, al Qaeda detonated truck bombs outside the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, killing over two hundred people and injuring several thousand more. Victims of these attacks sued the French bank BNP Paribas for damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), alleging the bank provided financial assistance to

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs—Palestinians and Palestinian-Americans from East Jerusalem, the West *75 Bank, the Gaza Strip, and five Palestinian village councils—bring this lawsuit against forty-nine Defendants, including indivi