Cases

BYE, Circuit Judge. Louis A. Soileau pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court 1 determined Soileau had four prior convictions which qualified as violent felonies, and thus he was subject to the enhanced sentencing provisions of the

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Joseph Soileau was charged by bill of information with wire fraud, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2. The bill alleged that Soileau defrauded Medicare by billing for services provided by satellite clinics which were not Medicare certified. Soi-leau pled guilty to one count of the charge and was sentenced to 60 months imprisonment, three years supervised

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

158 So.2d 397 (1963) Eloi SOILEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 975. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 3, 1963. Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellant. Gist, Murchison & Gist, Attorneys, by DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.

*1010AMY, Judge. |,The defendant pled guilty to multiple offenses in connection with a burglary in Evangeline Parish. The trial court sentenced the defendant to ten years at hard labor for the defendant’s simple burglary conviction, eight years at hard labor for his theft of $1,500 or greater conviction, and two years at hard labor for his simple criminal damage less than $500 co

EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, specially concurring: I concur in the judgment only. With due respect to the majority, Hood and Katz may dispose of any Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity claim that Texas could raise here,1 but those cases do not resolve whether the Bankruptcy Code in fact authorizes the discharge of Soileau’s defaulted bail bonds. Currently,

LESTER E. SOILEAU, JR., ET AL., v. DARREL FOREMAN. No. 09-1346. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 7, 2010. Not Designated for Publication. GUY OLDEN MITCHELL, III, Attorney at Law, 225 Court Street, Ville Platte, LA, Counsel for Defendant/Appellee: Darrel Foreman. JONATHAN CLYDE VIDRINE, West & Vidrine, P. O. Drawer 1019, Ville Platte, LA, Coun

Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #027 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 26th day of June, 2019, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2019-C-0040 ELIZABETH SOILEAU v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. In this workers' compensation matter, we are presented with the question of whether an employee's motion to compel her employer

PICKETT, Judge. _JjThe claimant, Claire Soileau, sustained injury from a 2006 work-related fall. Although the employer, TMC Foods, Inc., paid compensation benefits, it terminated those benefits in 2011. The employer also denied a cervical surgery recommended by the claimant’s treating orthopedic surgeon. In filing this matter, the claimant sought reinstatement of benefits, an order that the employer provide the recommended

GENOVESE, Judge. _JjThis matter involves a dispute over the interpretation of a will. The decedent’s only child, Sandra Kay Soileau Leake (“Leake”), is appealing the grant of summary judgment in favor of the decedent’s first cousin, Sadie Veillon (“Veillon”). The trial court named Veillon as the succession *565representative and also found her to be the sole legatee o

GEE, Circuit Judge: The district court found defendants guilty of hunting on a baited field in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i). Substantial evidence supports, and we thus affirm, these convictions. One defendant was additionally convicted of taking a migratory non-game bird in violation of the Act. A federal ag

GREMILLION, Judge. |, The plaintiff, Mary Phyllis Soileau, and the defendant, Hartford Insurance Company, appealed a jury verdict in Soileau’s favor. On remand from the Louisiana Su*1063preme Court, we address the merits. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Soileau sustained serious injurie

HUGHES, J.* |, We granted certiorari in this case to review the effect to be given the dismissal of an insured, in the presence of the jury, during trial on the merits of a personal injury action. For the reasons assigned, we reverse the appellate court and remand for consideration of the remaining assignments of error raised on appeal. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

| iPETERS, Judge. On October 2, 1991, judgment was rendered in favor of James Clint Soileau against Troy Ardoin and Kevin Bourgeois, jointly, severally, and in solido, in the amount of $8,165.17- together with legal interest and costs of court. The judgment was awarded because of an intentional battery committed upon Soileau by Ardoin and Bourgeois. The trial court found that Ardoin was eighty percent at fault and Bourgeoi

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2003 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2004. In The

40 So.3d 379 (2010) Mary Phyllis SOILEAU v. SMITH'S TRUE VALUE AND RENTAL, et al. Nos. 09-1066, 09-1279. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. May 26, 2010. *380 W. Glenn Soileau, Jacques P. Soileau, Soileau Law Offices, Breaux Bridge, LA, *381 for Plaintiff/Appellee, Mary Phyllis Soile

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3214 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jonathan Lee Sutton

556 F.3d 1337 (2009) SKF USA, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellant, and United States International Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellant, and Timken U.S. Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and United States, Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1202 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ELISEO VAQUERANO CANAS, A/K/A PELIGROSO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]

(2008) PAT HUVAL RESTAURANT & OYSTER BAR, INC., Jim Fruge d/b/a Fisherman's Cove, Catfish Wholesale, Inc., Frank Melancon d/b/a French's Enterprises Seafood Peeling Plant, Aqua Farms Crawfish, Inc., Andre Leger d/b/a Chez Francois, Charles Bernard d/b/a Charles' Crawfish Pad, and J. Bernard Seafood Processing, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, United States International Trade Commission, Daniel R. Pearson (Chairman, United State