Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Snow v. Cruz”
Santa Cruz v. Snowpublic domain
402 F.Supp.2d 113 (2005) Federico SANTA CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. John W. SNOW, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 01-1364(HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 6, 2005. *114 *115 *116 Martin Francis McMahon, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Snow v. Standard Insurancepublic domain
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Gloria Snow was an employee of Harlyn Products, Inc., which maintained a long-term disability plan. The Plan was issued by Standard Insurance Company, and that company also served as the Plan’s claims review administrator. Snow claimed that she was disabled due to Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFS), but her claim was denied. She then commenced this action pursuant to the Employment Ret
Cruz v. Heights Broadway, LLCpublic domain
Cruz v Heights Broadway, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 02612) Cruz v Heights Broadway, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 02612 Decided on May 16, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Cruz v. Heights Broadway, LLCpublic domain
Cruz v Heights Broadway, LLC (2023 NY Slip Op 02612) Cruz v Heights Broadway, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 02612 Decided on May 16, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
United States v. Cruzpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 9, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert
Cruz v. Rampersadpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), entered December 21, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. A real property owner or a party in possession or control of real property will be held liable for injuries sustained i
Cruz v. Rampersadpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), entered December 21, 2011, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. A real property owner or a party in possession or control of real property will be held liable for injuries sustained i
Tafoya-Cruz v. Temperance Beer Co. LLCpublic domain
2020 IL App (1st) 190606 THIRD DIVISION July 29, 2020 No. 1-19-0606 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT JORGE TAFOYA-CRUZ a
Tafoya-Cruz v. Temperance Beer Co. LLCpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Cruz v. Astruepublic domain
746 F.Supp.2d 978 (2010) Ralph CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Cause No. 2:09-CV-262-PRC. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. September 27, 2010. *979 Barry A. Schultz, Law Offices of Barry A. Schultz PC, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff.</
Cristina Cruz v. Nilda Maypapublic domain
GREGORY, Circuit Judge: Cristina Fernandez Cruz appeals the dismissal of her claims against defendantsappellees Nilda J. Maypa, Michelle Barba (“Mrs. Barba”), and Ferdinand Barba (“Mr. Barba”) under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (“TVPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589, 1590, 1595 (2012), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 216 (2012), and Virginia
Cruz v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered May 21, 2014, which granted defendant Transit Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Although defendant moved for summary judgment before producing a witness for deposition, the motion was not premature. Defendant established prima facie that pla
Cruz v. Statepublic domain
Dissenting Opinion by BATTAGLIA and MURPHY, JJ. We respectfully dissent. To us, a trial judge cannot commit reversible error when the supplementing instruction given was legally correct and it was REQUIRED to be given under State v. Baby, 404 Md. 220, 946 A.2d 463 (2008). From our review of the record, furthermore, although there are cases in which a party
People v. Cruzpublic domain
44 Cal.4th 636 (2008) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOMAS VERANO CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. S042224. Supreme Court of California. July 24, 2008. *643 Michael R. Snedeker and Lisa R. Short, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant. Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorne
Cruz v. Statepublic domain
895 A.2d 1076 (2006) 168 Md. App. 149 Oscar E. CRUZ v. STATE of Maryland. No. 1417 September Term, 2005. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 4, 2006. *1077 Edward A. Richitelli, Elkton, for Appellant. Gary E. O'Connor (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellee
Cruz v. County of Nassaupublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), entered June 18, 2007, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Gerard Tedeschi and Eileen Tedeschi which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed fr
Cruz v. Glosspublic domain
NANOVIC, J., In this case we must determine whether the Skier’s Responsibility Act applies to a personal injury action brought by an injured skier against a snowboarder and, if so, the standard of care owed by one sporting participant to another. *451The relevant facts are largely undisputed. On January 26,1999, at approximately 8:45 p.m. the p
Cruz v. Leviev Fulton Club, LLCpublic domain
711 F.Supp.2d 329 (2010) Eddie CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. LEVIEV FULTON CLUB, LLC, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 6982(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 14, 2010. *331 Martin Gerald Dobin, David A. Kaminsky & Associates, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Yevgeny Tsyngauz, Tsyngauz & Associates, P.C., Michael
Cruz v. Farmspublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Chris Farms appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated July 31, 2001, as granted the motion of the defendant Theodore Bouzalas for summary judgment dismissing the appellant’s cross claims insofar as asserted against him. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The plaintif
State of Tennessee v. Robert M. Deunes-Cruzpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 18, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT M. DEUNES-CRUZ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40801483 Michael R. Jones, Judge No. M2011-00879-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 7, 2013 The Defendant, Robert M. Deunes-Cruz, was convicted by a Montgomery County Circuit Court jur