Cases

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Your Towne Builders, Inc., Cooper : CASES CONSOLIDATED Custom Homes, Inc., Hess Home : Builders, Inc., C&F, Inc., Horst & Son, : Inc., Costello Builders, Inc., and : Keystone Custom Homes, Inc., on : behalf of themselves and all others : similarly situated : : v. : : Manhei

OPINION BY Judge COVEY. MarkWest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC (MarkWest) and Range Resources — Appalachia, LLC (Range Resources) appeal from the Washington *552County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) January 21, 2013 order affirming the Cecil Township (Township) Zoning Hearing Board’s (Board) decision denying Mar-kWest’s application for spe

977 F.2d 764 61 USLW 2268, 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 39, 78Ed. Law Rep. 234 In re SCHOOL ASBESTOS LITIGATION.PFIZER INC., Petitioner,v.The Honorable James McGirr KELLY, Nominal Respondent,Barnwell School District No. 45, School District ofLancaster, Manheim Township School District,Lampeter-Strasburg School District, Board of Education ofthe Memphis City Schools, and a Conditionally CertifiedC

921 F.2d 1310 59 USLW 2394, 18 Fed.R.Serv.3d 399 In re SCHOOL ASBESTOS LITIGATION.KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., Petitioner,v.The Honorable James McGirr KELLY, Nominal Respondent,andBarnwell School District No. 45, Respondent.In re SCHOOL ASBESTOS LITIGATION.UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, Petitioner,v.The Honorable James McGirr KELLY, Nominal Respondent,andBarnwell School Distric

Opinion by Oelady, J., The foundation of this proceeding is the petition for the appointment of viewers to lay out a public road, to begin and end at clearly defined points, and “if they see occasion to lay out the same, to inquire of and vacate a public road now opened from the Frankford and Bristol Turnpike road, at a point opposite the cemetery, to the terminus of the Lower State road, on the line of the pro

769 A.2d 567 (2001) CITY OF LANCASTER (WATER), Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent. City of Lancaster (Water), Petitioner, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. City of Lancaster (Water), Petitioner, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent. Townships of Manheim, Lancaster, East Hempfield, West Lampeter, East Lampeter, Manor and West Hempfield and the Leola Se

Smith, J. In August 2014, the plaintiff was driving a vehicle with his fiancée and two-year-old child as passengers. Two undercover county detectives were traveling behind the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff believed that the county detectives were following his vehicle too closely, so he started to "brake check" them. Apparently, this did not cause the county detectives to distance themselves from the plaintiff's vehicle as he h

Smith, District Judge. *483MEMORANDUM OPINION Four municipalities recently passed responsible contractor ordinances which specify certain criteria that a contractor must satisfy to be eligible to perform work valued over a certain monetary threshold for those municipalities. The plaintiffs, the local

2022 IL App (4th) 220302 FILED November 14, 2022 NO. 4-22-0302 Carla Bender 4th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COURT Court, IL

MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge. This is a state law action for conversion and replevin regarding the ownership of an Andy Warhol painting. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Motion is denied. I. FACTS The Complaint alleges the following facts. Robert Fenton (“Robe

OPINION OF THE COURT BECKER, Circuit Judge. I.INTRODUCTION Before us are eight petitions for mandamus brought by various defendants shortly before trial was scheduled to begin in this nationwide products liability class action. The trial, which has been stayed pending resolution of these petitions, will concern over 30,000 school districts’ claims that the defendants are liable for expenses in

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

OPINION BY Judge FRIEDMAN. Fairfield Area School District et al. (the School Districts) appeal from the March 27, 2003, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County (trial court), which dissolved preliminary injunctions issued against The National Organization for Children, Inc. et al. (Einstein Academy). The School Districts also appeal from the trial court’s May 21, 2003, order, which sustained Einst

879 A.2d 400 (2005) ALDHELM, INC., Appellant v. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU and Freeland Holding Company, Inc. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs May 13, 2005. Decided July 20, 2005. *402 Michael A. O'Pake, Pottsville, for appellant. Robert S. Frycklund, Pottsville, for appellee, Schuylkill Coun

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

DOYLE, President Judge. Carolee Medico, Prothonotary of Lu-zerne County, appeals an administrative order issued by the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, the Honorable Joseph M. Augello, governing the management of transcripts of court proceedings. BACKGROUND Sometime prior to May 26, 1999, Medico allowed notes of testimony filed as of record in the Prothon

143 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 476 (1991) 599 A.2d 289 CITY OF LANCASTER, Township of Fulton, Township of West Lampeter, Borough of Marietta, Borough of Strasburg and Arthur E. Morris, George K. Brinton, et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER, Board of Commissioners of the County of Lancaster, James E. Huber, Brad S. Fischer, Robert H. Brenneman and Lancaster County Board of Assessment Appeals, Appellees.

563 F.Supp.2d 474 (2008) NEW JERSEY PROTECTION & ADVOCACY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-2978 (MLC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 30, 2008. *478 Lowenstein Sandler PC (David L. Harris and Stephen M. Plotnick of counsel), Roseland,

914 F.Supp. 1132 (1996) Robert J. TETI and Francine Teti, Plaintiffs, v. HURON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-1315. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 29, 1996. *1133 Jonathan Krinick, Sagot, Jennings, & Sigmond, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs. Paul F.X. Gallagher, Richard K.

745 F.Supp. 288 (1990) Michael J. KOLBECK, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Tait Design and Machine, and Charles N. Tait, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 88-0714. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 6, 1990. *289 Larry E. Coben, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Edward A. Gray, Donald Camhi, Philadelph