Cases

JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I agree with the excellent opinion of the Majority in all but one respect. Like Judge Rendell and those joining her partial dissent, I cannot join Part IV.A of the Majority Opinion. I have serious doubts about the Majority’s assertion that there was no nonjudicial forfeiture proceeding here and, hence, I also question the conclusion th

415 B.R. 561 (2009) David Blain CARROLL, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America, Department of the Treasury, Appellee. No. 5:08-cv-01181-CLS. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. May 6, 2009. David Blain Carroll, Atlanta, GA, pro se. Alice H. Martin, U.S. Attorney's Office, Birmingham, AL, David Zisserson, U.S. Dept. of Justi

MEMORANDUM OPINION Austin E. Carter, United States Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter comes before the Court on the Debtors’ objection to a claim filed by the Department of the Treasury— Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). The Debtors objected to the priority asserted by the IRS regarding a portion of its claim, to which objection the United States of America, on behalf of the IRS, responded. The Co

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAUREATUS GROUP, LLC, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-2103 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 23, 24 : U

McKEE, RENDELL and SMITH, Circuit Judges OPINION (April 16, 2009) SMITH, Circuit Judge We have consolidated for decision three cases that present questions regarding payment of the fees required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(e) for initiating an appea

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Yemoh Smith appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his Privacy Act complaint and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Smith’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ANTHONY A. KUKLINSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1499 (RMC) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICHARD SIEGEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 16-2288 (RDM) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 24. Plaint

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the Federal Labor Relations Authority’s affirmance of an arbitrator’s award that held a regulation is*684sued by the Customs Service in violation of a statute regulating coastwise trade. The Authority challenges our jurisdiction to review its or

859 F.Supp. 977 (1994) T.T. SALVAGE AUCTION CO. INC., d/b/a Boulevard Pawn Shop, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY, the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, Defendant. No. 93-777-CIV-5-BR. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division. August 4, 1994. *978 Tommy W. Jarrett, Dees, Smith, Powell, Jarrett Dees &

OPINION COWEN, Circuit Judge. Appellants Conestoga Wood Specialties Corporation (“Conestoga”), Norman Hahn, Elizabeth Hahn, Norman Lemar Hahn, Anthony Hahn, and Kevin Hahn (collectively, “the Hahns”) appeal from an order of the District Court denying their motion for a preliminary injunction. In their Complaint, Appellants allege that regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CANNARBOR, INC., UNPUBLISHED March 25, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JESSALYN MARCUS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-1686 (EGS) JANET YELLEN, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jessalyn Marcus (“Pla

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Viktoriya Usachenok v. State of New Jersey, Department of the Treasury (A-40-22) (086861) Argued January 3, 2024 -- Decided May 6, 2024 RABNER, C.J., writing for a unanimous Court

564 F.3d 176 (2009) Dana M. PORTER v. DEPT. OF the TREASURY. *Michael Buesgens, Appellant in No. 07-3859. *(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.). Tommie H. Telfair, Appellant in No. 08-4663 v. Karen P. Tandy, Administrator-Drug Enforcement Administration; Gerard P. McAleer, Director/Senior Officer-DEA: Newark; 1-50 Unknown DEA Agents; 1-50 Unknown Federal Agents; Ray McCarthy, Chief of Police, Newark; Murad Muhammed, Roberty-Homi

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. When Venus Springs applied for a job at Ally Financial, she omitted some pertinent information: Springs had been fired from her previous job at Mayer Brown, a global law firm that happened to be one of Ally’s largest providers of legal services. Ally hired Springs to assist its legal department with the selection and retention of outside law firms, and by Springs’s account, the relationshi

213 B.R. 596 (1997) FRANKLIN SAVINGS CORPORATION and Franklin Savings Association, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, and United States of America, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 95-2039-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 11, 1997. Order Granting Reconsideration September 11, 1997.

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Motion Requesting That This Court Alter and/or Amend Its Judgment, or Alternatively Reconsider Its Judgment (“PL’s Mot. to Recons.”) [Dkt. # 100] and Defendants’ Fourth Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment with its supporting memorandum (“Defs.’