Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Smith v. United States”
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-CF-1095 ANTHONY SMITH, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES, A
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 236–254 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 18-CO-289 & 20-CF-190 GLENN ARTHUR SMITH, JR., APPELLANT, V. UNI
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims PETRINA SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 19-1348 (Filed: December 2, 2022) v. FLSA collective action; THE UNITED STATES, conditional certification; notice; equitable tolling
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CF-298 GREGORY RAY SMITH, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-CF-298 GREGORY RAY SMITH, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-CF-798 MAXIM REGAN SMITH, APPELLANT, v.
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) TIMOTHIE E. SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 21-1072C ) v. ) Filed: March 15, 2022 ) THE UNITED STATES, )
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims PETRINA SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 19-cv-1348 v. Filed: October 15, 2021 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Lisa Brevard, The Markham Law Firm, San Diego California. With her on the briefs are David R. Markham and Maggie Realin, The Markham Law Firm, San Diego Cal
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims PETRINA SMITH, Plaintiff, No. 19-cv-1348 v. Filed: November 19, 2021 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Walt Pennington, Pennington Law Firm, San Diego, California. With him on the briefs are David R. Markham, Maggie Realin, and Lisa Brevard, The Markham Law
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED MAR 22 2021 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Brent Smith v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1053 ___________________________ Brent Michael Smith lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Rehaif v. United States , 588 U.S. ---- (2019).
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NICK R. SMITH, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 20-301 (JEB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Petitioner Nick R. Smith’s habeas Petition strings together a series of farfetched allegations, requiring sua sponte dismissal for la
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
*393Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.