Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Smith v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.”
Carlisle v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND “On October
Stellar It v. Scaliapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PURDUE UNIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. Action No. 20-3006 (EGS) EUGENE SCALIA, in his official capacity as Secretary, Department of Labor, et al., Defendants. STELLAR IT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. Action No. 20-3175 (EGS) EUGENE SCALIA, in his official capacity as
Stellar J Corp. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.public domain
749 F.Supp.2d 1137 (2010) STELLAR J CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. SMITH & LOVELESS, INC., a Kansas corporation, Defendant. City of Rainier, for the use and benefit of Smith & Loveless, Inc., and Smith & Loveless, Inc., a Kansas corporation, Counterclaimants, v. Stellar J Corporation, a Texas corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, an insurance company, Counterdefendants.
ACCEPTED 04-14-00357-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/5/201
Stellar v. Saucon Mutual Ins.public domain
REIBMAN, J., The present dispute arises out of the cancellation of an insurance policy issued by defendant Saucon Mutual Insurance Co. Plaintiff has filed a four-count complaint seeking recovery under theories of fraud, breach of contract, and the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Practices Law (UTPCPL). Defendant has filed preliminary objections demurring to the claims for punitive damages and attorney’s fees. Additio
United States v. wb/stellar Ip Owner LLCpublic domain
800 F.Supp.2d 496 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. WB/STELLAR IP OWNER LLC, Independence Plaza Associates, LLC, Independence Plaza, L.P., and Laurence Gluck, Defendants. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Glenn Gardens Associates, L.P., Defendant. Nos. 06 Civ. 7115(SAS), 06 Civ. 11440(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 11, 2011
OPINION SUE WALKER, JUSTICE I.Introduction This is an interlocutory appeal from an order certifying a class action. 1 Appellants Lon Smith & Associates, Inc. and A-l Systems, Inc., d/b/a Lon Smith Roofing and Construction
Ammons v. Ally Fin., Inc.public domain
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Martha Ammons brings suit against Ally Financial, Inc. ("Ally"), under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. This case arises out of hundreds of debt-collection telephone calls that Ammons claims Ally made to her
Popescu v. Apple Inc.public domain
*44 Opinion MÁRQUEZ, J. Plaintiff Dan Popescu sued Apple Inc. (Apple) for damages after he was fired by his employer, Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC (Constellium). He alleged that between August and October 2011, Apple took affirmative steps to convince Constellium to termin
Fleming v. Associated Credit Servs., Inc.public domain
Kevin McNulty, United States District Judge Diana Fleming sues Associated Credit Services, Inc. ("ACS"), over a series of *566allegedly harassing phone calls that occurred from September 2015 to December 2015, which she claims were harassing in nature. These were dunning calls related to Ms. Fleming's unpaid electric bills; the power company ha
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Duty Free Americas, Inc. (“DFA”), which operates duty free stores in many international airports nationwide, appeals the district court’s dismissal of its multi-count suit against The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc. (“Estée Lauder”), the largest manufacturer of beauty products sold in duty free retail outlets in the United States. DFA claims that Estée Lauder
Case: 14-11853 Date Filed: 08/07/2015 Page: 1 of 62 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-11853 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:12-cv-60741-
In re Lightsquared Inc.public domain
DECISION DENYING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTORS’ THIRD AMENDED JOINT PLAN PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 11 OF BANKRUPTCY CODE SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND ...62 A. The Third Amended Plan ... 64 B. Motions Filed in Connection with Confirmation ... 66
Ragen v. Hancor, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KATZ, District Judge. Plaintiff William Ragen (who does business as Ragen Associates) spent twenty years as a manufacturer’s representative, selling pipe and related drainage products made by defendant Hancor, Inc. During those years, the relationship evolved and changed in several ways. The parties started with a written contract in 1988 and updated it in writing in 1992, 19
Martin v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.public domain
ORDER AND RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA I. INTRODUCTION Lately pregnant, a long-term employee, a certain store’s co-director, asks her direct supervisor for a restructured set of duties, i.e. an accommodation of responsibilities, none deemed “essential” or “primary.” Her doctor advises
Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Quattrocchipublic domain
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN. OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Skydive Arizona owns and operates one of the largest skydiving centers in the world. Defendants Butler, Quattrocchi, Atlanta SC, Inc., CASC, Inc., and IGOVincent, Inc. (collectively, SKYRIDE) operate an Internet and telephone-based advertising service, mak
(2008) APPALACHIAN RAILCAR SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOATRIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC., an Alabama corporation, Shane Boatright, an individual, Matthew Beard, an individual, Craig Allen, an individual, and Consumers Energy Company, a Michigan corporation, Defendants. Case No. 1:05-cv-790. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. March 25, 2008.
Beard Research, Inc. v. Katespublic domain
8 A.3d 573 (2010) BEARD RESEARCH, INC. and CB Research & Development, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Michael J. KATES, ASDI, Inc., Advanced Synthesis Group, Inc., Alan Blize, Garry Smith, Michael Wagaman, and Stephen Jones, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1316-VCP. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: December 3, 2009. Decided: April 23, 2010.
Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Quattrochipublic domain
704 F.Supp.2d 841 (2010) SKYDIVE ARIZONA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Cary QUATTROCHI, et al., Defendant. No. CV-05-2656-PHX-MHM. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 31, 2010. *844 Sid Leach, Snell & Wilmer LLP, Monica Anne Limon-Wynn, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff. Ivan Kurian Mathew, Mathew & Associates, Phoenix
Anaya v. CBS BROADCASTING INC.public domain
626 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2009) Lillian ANAYA and Mel Anaya, Plaintiffs, v. CBS BROADCASTING INC., Emmis Communications, Corp., Sharyl Attkisson, Tri-City Auto Sales, Inc. d/b/a All Mustang Performance or AMP Performance, and Thomas Thompson in his official and individual capacities, Defendants. No. CIV 06-0476 JB/LCS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 29, 2009.