Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge. The court has for consideration a motion to remand and for attorney’s fees filed by plaintiff, Minnie Smith (“Smith”). Defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (“State Farm”), has responded, and Smith has replied to that response. On January 12, 2012, Smith filed her action in the Circuit Court

737 F.Supp.2d 702 (2010) Kevin and Carol SMITH, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 10-cv-12312. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 17, 2010. *704 Alberta L. Adams, Douglas G. McCray, Michael H. Fabian, Fabian, Sklar, Farmington Hills, MI, for Plaintiffs.

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) to recover an unsatisfied judgment against the insured of the defendants State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Insurance Companies, in an underlying action entitled Smith v Public Administrator of Suffolk County on Behalf of the Estate of Leonard Smith, commenced in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under index No. 25071/03, the plaintiff appeals from an order of th

656 N.W.2d 432 (2003) Joan F. SMITH, Respondent, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. No. C8-02-997. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. February 11, 2003. *434 Thomas W. Larkin, Melchert Hubert Sjodin, PLLP, Waconia, MN, for respondent. C. Todd Koebele, Michelle D. Christensen, Murnane, Conlin, White Brandt, St.

In re Talamo, Gus; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 470-240; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 98CW-0557. Granted; Remanded to the court of appeal for briefing, argument and opinion. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

MEMORANDUM ORDER FEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendants” or “State Farm”) have filed a Motion to Compel which presents important questions concerning Federal Civil Rule 26(a)(2)(B)’s requirements for disclosure of expert testimony. The parties have provided helpful memoran-da, sett

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 May 1993.

LEWIS, Judge. Defendant issued a renter’s insurance policy to plaintiff effective 10 November 1988 to 10 November 1989. Plaintiffs apartment was burglarized the weekend of 23-24 September 1989. Upon notification of the theft by plaintiff, defendant issued a $1,000 check to her which she promptly cashed. On 13 October 1989 plaintiff submitted a personal property inventory form listing the items stolen, including an Epson comput

425 S.E.2d 719 (1993) Kenneth E. SMITH and H. Clarice Smith, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant. No. 9118SC1030. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 16, 1993. Haywood, Denny, Miller, Johnson, Sessoms & Patrick, by Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, for plaintiffs-appellants. Frazier, Frazier &

In re Smith, O.V.;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0546; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 141,947. *414Prior report: La.App., 589 So.2d 107. Denied. WATSON, J., would grant the writ.

127 Wis.2d 298 (1985) 380 N.W.2d 372 James W. SMITH and Thomas D. White, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 85-1218. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 9, 1985. Decided October 28, 1985. *299 For the defendant

POLITZ, Circuit Judge: These cross-appeals involve the propriety of statutory penalties and fees assessed against a fire insurer, and the commencement date for legal interest thereon. We affirm the award of penalties and fees, and modify and affirm the award of interest. Wesley D. Smith, individually and on behalf of his minor child, and Deanna Smith, his wife, sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Company in

State Farm Fire Casualty Company ("State Farm"), as subrogee of its insured, JC Propeller Service ("JC Propeller"), and JC Propeller appeal from the dismissal of their action against Aretha Smith. We reverse and remand. On December 29, 2008, State Farm and JC Propeller sued Smith, alleging that Smith had negligently caused an automobile to collide with a building owned by JC Propeller. On February 6, 2009, Smith filed a motion to dismiss, asserting insufficient service of proce

381 So.2d 913 (1980) Benton SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 7476. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 5, 1980. Ryder & Deshotels by Errol D. Deshotels, Oberlin, for plaintiff-appellee. Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appe

McCALLUM, J. *1178This lawsuit results from a significant crack located in the foundation of a house in Downsville, Louisiana, owned by Toby and Sherri Shreve ("Shreves"). A jury found the crack was caused by a tree falling on the house, which was covered by their homeowner's insurance policy with State Farm. The jury also found that State

MEMORANDUM DECISION Feb 05 2015, 9:54 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Dennis F. Cantrell William H. Wald

695 F.2d 202 Wesley D. SMITH, individually and as the administrator ofthe estate of his minor child, Stacey Smith, andDeanna Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees CrossAppellants,v.STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCross Appellee. No. 82-3344Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan. 14, 1983.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered April 23, 2015. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, ordered a new trial on damages to the dwelling and additional living expenses unless plaintiff stipulates to damages of $43,000 and $11,669.60, respectively. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Smith, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. *1618NeMoyer, J.), entered December 4, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motion of defendant to set aside a verdict and ordered a new trial on damages to the dwelling and additional living expenses unless plaintiff stipulates to damages of $43,000 and $11,669.60, respectively. It is he

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. *1618NeMoyer, J.), entered December 4, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motion of defendant to set aside a verdict and ordered a new trial on damages to the dwelling and additional living expenses unless plaintiff stipulates to damages of $43,000 and $11,669.60, respectively. It is he