Cases

*1309Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W. Setter, Jr., J.), entered September 13, 2005. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this act

207 F.Supp.2d 1031 (2002) Keith SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., et al., Defendants. No. C 01-03252 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 12, 2002. *1032 Lanny Jay, Monte Rio, CA, Roger B. Thurrell, Santa Rosa, CA, for Plaintiff. Cody Jaffe, Kenneth A. Jew, Tyler A. Brown, Jackson, Lewis, S

276 F.Supp.2d 603 (2003) Rodney R. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant. No. CIV. 3:01-CV-675LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. May 30, 2003. *604 Joseph Patrick Frascogna, Frascogna Courtney, PLLC, Jackson, MS, David A. Szwak, Bodenheimer, Jones, Szwak & Winchell, LLP, Shr

PER CURIAM: The appellant and plaintiff1 below, Charles E. Smith (“Smith”), appeals the entry of summary judgment by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County in favor of the appellees and defendants below, Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”) and Gregory Bond (“Bond”), a Sears store manager. Smith sued the appellees, claiming, inter alia, that the appellees violated the West

These consolidated appeals involve a dispute over the collection of sales tax on fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides. In July 1991, W.A. Visintainer and others (taxpayers), individually and as a class, filed a complaint against K-Mart and numerous other fictitious defendants (merchants), alleging that the merchants had illegally collected sales tax on fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides, in violation of Ala. Code 1975, §§ 40-23-4(a

447 S.E.2d 255 (1994) 191 W.Va. 563 Charles E. SMITH and Annette Smith, Plaintiffs Below, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Gregory Bond and Ora L. "Bud" Patton, Jr., Defendants Below. Ora L. "Bud" PATTON, Jr., Third-Party Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 21887. Supreme Court of Appeals

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. *303In this workers' compensation action, Sears Roebuck and Co. ("Sears") petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") to vacate its order compelling Sears to approve certain medical treatment for its former employee Jeffrey Donaldson.1

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. *303In this workers' compensation action, Sears Roebuck and Co. ("Sears") petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court ("the trial court") to vacate its order compelling Sears to approve certain medical treatment for its former employee Jeffrey Donaldson.1

Pope, Judge. Sears, Roebuck and Company filed suit against appellant seeking to recover a debt. The appellant, upon being served with process, telephoned the attorney for Sears and conferred with him concerning a payment schedule for repaying the debt. Appellant claims that after speaking with the attorney, he was under the impression that the telephone call was a sufficient “answer” and that this was all he needed to do conce

Mr. JUSTICE CRAVEN, dissenting: Sears’ “Easy Payment Plan” violates the Retail Installment Sales Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 121½, par. 501 et seq.). Section 3(a) of the Retail Installment Sales Act requires that retail installment sales contracts be in writing, and completed in all essential details prior to being signed by

WATSON, Judge. MOTION TO DISMISS This suit was instituted in the Lake Charles City Court by plaintiff, Roger Smith, against Sears, Roebuck and Company to recover damages resulting from the death of a puppy owned by plaintiff and his family. Following a trial, judgment was rendered and signed on February 26, 1979, granting judgment to plaintiff for $920.00 plus interest. From this adverse judgment defendant pe

KANNE, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by Apex Digital, Incorporated, to collect money for goods they sold to Sears, Roebuck & Company. Apex alleged that Sears breached then-contract by refusing to pay the total amount it owed to Apex for goods delivered. Sears argued that this action was barred by the four-year statute of limitations set forth in Sect

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff Tami Wiederhold filed this employment action on August 17, 2011, against her former employer, the defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”). Wiederhold claims that after she developed a physical impairment, Sears refused to accommodate her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 4

JOHNSON, Judge. Eagle Star Insurance Company, one of the plaintiffs, has appealed from the judgment of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans dismissing the civil action against Sears, Roebuck and Company, in which action plaintiffs, Louis E. Smith and his fire insurance carrier, seek to recover damages caused by a fire in plaintiff Smith’s home in the early morning of December 14, 1963. Smith was granted an appea

180 P.3d 697 (2008) 2008 OK CIV APP 33 Angela FREEMAN, individually, and Angela Freeman, guardian and next friend of the minor children, Taryn Freeman and Aimee Freeman, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York corporation, Defendant/Appellee, Mark Fenton, and John Doe, d/b/a Pro-Tech Heat and Air, Defendants. No. 104,723. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklaho

681 So.2d 871 (1996) Latrell B. SMITH, Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Appellee. No. 95-3393. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 22, 1996. Latrell B. Smith, pro se. Ross McCloy of Harrison, Sale, McCloy and Thompson, Chartered, Panama City, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Latrell B. Smith appeals a final judgment in f

157 S.W.3d 886 (2005) SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. d/b/a Sears Heating and Air Conditioning, and D/FW Home Improvement Specialists, Inc. d/b/a Home Improvement Specialists, Inc., and Randy Sprinkle d/b/a Texas Air Conditioning & Plumbing, Appellants, v. Steven ABELL and Peggy Abell, Appellees. No. 08-03-000031-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. February 10, 2005.

(2008) Kimberly TOWNES MOSES, on behalf of herself and as a representative of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 17:07cv00423. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. March 3, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION SAMUEL G. WILSON, District Judge. P

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Vicki Lynn Smith appeals from the district court’s order excluding the testimony of her expert witness under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and for summary judgment in favor of defendants Sears Roebuck

572 F.3d 440 (2009) APEX DIGITAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-1019. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued June 2, 2009. Decided July 16, 2009. *441 Sibhan M. Murphy, Attorney (argued), Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Chicago, IL