Cases

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state actors and granting summary judgme

578 F.3d 246 (2009) Kevin SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None Royal Blackness, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jon OZMINT; Gary D. Maynard; Robert Ward; Gary A. Boyd; Gene Noles; James Sligh; Debra Wise; Alvin Graber; Lester Hinson, Jr.; Ms. Hill, OFC; Doris Curenton; Mary Stewart; Dean Day; Marcia Fuller; T.W. Thomas; Laurie Bessinger; Bernard McKie; Associate Warden Stevenson; Samuel Latta; James Christensen; Willie Mason; Harold Scott; Sergeant Shivers; E. Jennings

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Kevin Smith, a/k/a Bar None Royal Blackness, appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing two Defendants because the Defendants were not state actors and granting summary judgme

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 646.

394 F.Supp.2d 787 (2005) Dorothy SMITH, Plaintiff, v. John OZMINT, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Sheriff A. Lane Cribb, as Custodian of the Georgetown County Sheriff's Department, Robert Stewart, Chief, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Georgetown County Solicitor's Office, John Gregory Hembree, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Zacharias Grate, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Robert Medl

444 F.Supp.2d 502 (2006) Kevin SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None Royal Blackness # 164920 Plaintiff, v. Jon OZMINT, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, et. al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 04-1819. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. March 31, 2006. Kevin Smith, Columbia, SC, pro se. Matthew B. Rosbrugh, William Henry Da

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

541 U.S. 910 SMITHv.OZMINT, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. No. 03-8519. Supreme Court of United States. March 8, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 78 Fed. Appx. 307.

540 U.S. 846 SMITHv.OZMINT, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. No. 02-10960. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 4th Cir. 2 Ce

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angelo B. Ham appeals the denial of his motions to appoint counsel and to compel discovery and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reas

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court’s interlocutory order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Ham’s motion for a preliminary injunction.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Winte

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD concurred. Judge DAVIS wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: These claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 raise the issue whether certain actions taken by South Carolina prison officials after an inmate’s suspected re

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reas

PER CURIAM: Christopher Love Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant American Amenities, Inc.; claims against other Defendants remain pending in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C

PER CURIAM: Elwaldo R. James seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. James challenges the calculation of his sentence, but he has been released from custody and does not allege that collateral consequences warrant relief. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as moot. Se